isteducimus
KarishmaB - here is how I approached the question. Can you please let me know what I am missing -Step 1: 3 possible scenarios - 10,_,_,3 and 9,_,_,2 and 8,_,_,1. Can not select 2 digits out of the rest for each pair. So 1 digit can be filled in 6 ways, another in 5, rest 2 digits are fixed for each pair. So we have 6*5*1*1 - possible digits selection for each pairStep 2: The four numbers can be arranged in 4! ways. Number of ways to perform the selection and arrange the selected numbers = 3*6*5*4!Step 3: Total number of possible selections - 10*9*8*7 Probability = 3*6*5*4! / 10*9*8*7 = 3/7I am unable to figure out what I am doing wrong. Could you please help me. isteducimus Looking at your approach, you've done excellent work identifying the three scenarios correctly! Your mistake lies in how you're counting the arrangements, which is causing you to double-count. Let me help you see where the issue is.
Your Error Diagnosis:You correctly identified that for range \(= 7\), we need:
- \((10, -, -, 3)\) or \((9, -, -, 2)\) or \((8, -, -, 1)\)
However, when you calculated \(6 \times 5 \times 4!\) for arrangements, you're actually counting each selection multiple times. Here's why:
The Issue with Your Counting:When you select the middle numbers as \(6 \times 5\), you're already considering ORDER (first selecting one number, then another). But then you multiply by \(4!\) to arrange all four numbers, which counts the ordering AGAIN.
For example, if you select numbers \(10, 7, 5, 3\):
- Your \(6 \times 5\) counts selecting \(7\) first then \(5\) as different from selecting \(5\) first then \(7\)
- But then \(4!\) also rearranges these same numbers
- This creates duplicate counting!
The Correct Approach:Method 1: Using Combinations (Simpler)For each scenario (e.g., max \(= 10\), min \(= 3\)):
- We must include \(10\) and \(3\)
- Choose \(2\) numbers from \(\{4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9\}\)
- Number of ways \(= C(6,2) = 15\)
Total favorable outcomes \(= 3 \times 15 = 45\)
Total possible selections \(= C(10,4) = 210\)
Probability \(= \frac{45}{210} = \frac{3}{14}\)
Method 2: Fixing Your Ordered ApproachIf you want to use ordered counting throughout:
- Favorable outcomes: \(3 \times 6 \times 5 \times 2!\) (not \(4!\), because two positions are fixed)
- But wait! This gives \(3 \times 6 \times 5 \times 2 = 180\)
Actually, for ordered selection:
- Each scenario: Select and arrange \(4\) numbers where \(2\) are fixed
- This is \(P(6,2) \times 4!/2!\) ways to include the middle numbers and arrange everything
- \(= 30 \times 12 = 360\) per scenario
- Total: \(3 \times 360 = 1080\)
Total ordered selections: \(P(10,4) = 10 \times 9 \times 8 \times 7 = 5040\)
Probability \(= \frac{1080}{5040} = \frac{3}{14}\)
Why You Got \(3/7\):Your calculation \(\frac{3 \times 6 \times 5 \times 4!}{10 \times 9 \times 8 \times 7} = \frac{3 \times 6 \times 5 \times 24}{5040} = \frac{2160}{5040} = \frac{3}{7}\)
This is exactly double the correct answer because you counted each arrangement twice through the mixed ordering approach!
You can practice similar counting and probability problems
here - focus on combinatorics questions to reinforce consistent counting approaches.
Key Takeaway:When counting, be consistent: either count
ordered selections throughout OR count
unordered selections throughout. Mixing the two methods leads to overcounting or undercounting.