Legal commentator: The goal of a recently enacted law that bans smoking in workplaces is to protect employees from secondhand smoke. But the law is written in such a way that it cannot be interpreted as ever prohibiting people from smoking in their own homes.
The statements above, if true, provide a basis for rejecting which one of the following claims?
(A) The law will be interpreted in a way that is inconsistent with the intentions of the legislators who supported it.
(B) Supporters of the law believe that it will have a significant impact on the health of many workers.
(C) The law offers no protection from secondhand smoke for people outside of their workplaces.
(D) Most people believe that smokers have a fundamental right to smoke in their own homes.
(E) The law will protect domestic workers such as housecleaners from secondhand smoke in their workplaces.
Answer: EReason: For domestic workers, their workplace is at the homes of their employers. For these employers, the rule doesn't stop them from smoking at home. Hence, the law
WILL NOT PROTECT domestic workers
IN THEIR WORKPLACES