1. The author is primarily concerned withA. Showing that behavior is a more effective way of controlling bodily temperature than innate mechanisms.Wrong. This was mentioned only in paragraph 1.
B. Criticizing researchers who will not discard their theories about the effects of microwave radiation on organismsWrong. The theory was being criticized and not the researchers.
C. Demonstrating that effects of microwave radiation are different from those of other forms of radiationCorrect.
D. Analyzing the mechanism by which an organism maintains its bodily temperature in a changing thermal environmentWrong. It has been stated that how organisms maintain its bodily temperature but has not been analyzed.
E. Discussing the importance of thermoreceptors in the control of the internal temperature of an organismWrong. Was mentioned in one or two lines only.
2. The author makes which of the following points about innate mechanisms for heat production?1. They are governed by thermoreceptors inside the body of the organism rather than at the surface."but such responses result from the direct stimulation of thermoreceptors distributed widely within the central nervous system"
2. They are a less effective means of compensating for gross changes in temperature than behavioral strategies. "Since the heat is not conducted outward to the surface to stimulate the appropriate receptors, the organism does not “appreciate”
this stimulation in the same way that it “appreciates” heating and cooling of the skin."
3. They are not affected by microwave radiation.3. Which of the following would be the most logical topic for the author to take up in the paragraph following the final paragraph of the selection?A. A suggestion for new research to be done on the effects of microwaves on animals and human beingsCorrect. In the last paragraph the author is also discussing the effects of microwave radiations on organisms but with limited results.
B. An analysis of the differences between microwave radiationWrong. The paragraph is not talking about microwave radiations but it's effects on organisms and how does it affect them.
C. A proposal that the use of microwave radiation be prohibited because it is dangerousWrong. No such information has been mentioned in the earlier paragraphs.
D. A survey of the literature on the effects of microwave radiation on human beingsWrong. This option is just mentioning human beings and not animals.
E. A discussion of the strategies used by various species to control hypothermiaWrong. This has already been mentioned in the first paragraph.
4. The author implies that the proponents of the theory that microwave radiation acts on organisms in the same way as other forms of radiation based their conclusions primarily onA. Laboratory researchWrong. It can't be laboratory research as it has nothing to do with the chemicals.
B. Unfounded assumptionRight. "below 10 mW/cm2 were assumed to be “nonthermal” in nature."
C. Control group surveysWrong. This is not a survey but an expriment.
D. Deductive reasoningWrong. The author has not tried explain any reasons for the presented experiment results or theory.
E. Causal investigationWrong. It was not a casual investigation but a serious one.
5. The tone of the passage can best be described asA. Genial and conversationalWrong. The passage has a serious tone and it is not written in a funny manner or in a dialogue format.
B. Alarmed and disparagingWrong. The author did not raise any alarm or expressed his thoughts that something is of little worth.
C. Facetious and cynicalWrong. Cynical is a wrong word here as the there is nothing to be distrusting about the whole topic. They are stating the facts.
D. Scholarly and noncommittalWrong. The author did present his opinions in between.
E. Scholarly and concernedScholarly is a correct word and the author is expressing his concern by pointing out the weakness in the scientific theory.
6. The author is primarily concerned withA. Pointing out weaknesses in a popular scientific theoryCorrect. A popular scientific theory which has been accepted by everyone has few loopholes explained by the author.
B. Developing a hypothesis to explain a scientific phenomenonWrong. No hypothesis has been developed. A scientific theory is already presented.
C. Reporting on new research on the effects of microwave radiationWrong. Author did express his own opinion.
D. Criticizing the research methods of earlier investigatorsWrong. We are not talking about investigators here but the theory.
E. Clarifying ambiguities in the terminology used to describe a phenomenonWrong. The terminologies stated were correct.