If Sarah were a concert pianist for a major orchestra, she would be famous. She is not a concert pianist since she is not famous.
The conclusion above is unsound because the author does not consider thatThe statement only tells us that if Sarah were a concert pianist for a major orchestra, she would be famous. Since she is not famous, we can conclude only that she is not a concert pianist for a major orchestra. We cannot conclude that she is not a concert pianist at all.
The argument wrongly broadens the conclusion.
(A) Sarah could be a famous actress.
Wrong. The issue is whether Sarah could still be a concert pianist even though she is not famous.
(B) Sarah could be a harpist for a major orchestra.
Wrong. This is about being a harpist, not a concert pianist.
(C) Sarah could be a pianist with a rock group.
Wrong. This does not show that she could still be a concert pianist.
(D) Sarah could be a concert pianist with a minor orchestra.
Correct. This exposes the flaw. Sarah’s lack of fame rules out being a concert pianist for a major orchestra, but she could still be a concert pianist with a minor orchestra and not be famous.
(E) Sarah could be famous for another reason.
Wrong. The passage says Sarah is not famous, so this possibility is irrelevant.
Answer: (D)