Pop singer Clive Jones has been nominated for six Grammy Awards and his new album is enjoying its eighth consecutive week at number one on the charts. It is safe to say that Jones is todays best pop artist.
Let's jot down the points:
Premise: CJ nominated for 6Gs and album on top
Premise: ? (assumption)
Conclusion: Safe to say CJ is today's best pop artist
Which of the following
assumptions is most pivotal to this argument?
Our assumption could be something like these awards and songs/albums on top chart is the best measure to say about a person's popularity or success. POE is another best method to find the answer.
A. Jones’s previous albums were also chart-toppers.
INCORRECT. Nothing about previous albums is mentioned not do they have any relevance.
B. Jones’s next album will outsell his current release.
INCORRECT. Not required information. Out of scope.
C. Grammy nominations and record sales are accurate measures of an artist’s greatness.
CORRECT. Same as our probable answer.
D. Jones will win several of the Grammy Awards for which he has been nominated.
INCORRECT. Why to bring future in between? He may or may not win...how is this sentence creating a link between the premise and conclusion?
E. Jones is popular with both fans and music critics.
INCORRECT. A strong contender to me. Negation kinda works here. If Jones
is not popular with both fans and music critics, it won't weaken the conclusion as much as option C because the core idea of the passage is not popularity but on what context is CJ declared as biggest star just because he's been nominated for various awards and album is on top.
Though I got stuck between C and E, I am pretty sure that answer is option C.