Last visit was: 20 Apr 2026, 19:37 It is currently 20 Apr 2026, 19:37
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
gmatt1476
Joined: 04 Sep 2017
Last visit: 04 Feb 2026
Posts: 494
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 72
Posts: 494
Kudos: 27,275
 [186]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
179
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
ZoltanBP
Joined: 14 Apr 2017
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 79
Own Kudos:
1,005
 [33]
Given Kudos: 567
Location: Hungary
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
WE:Education (Education)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
Posts: 79
Kudos: 1,005
 [33]
23
Kudos
Add Kudos
10
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Shobhit7
Joined: 01 Feb 2017
Last visit: 29 Apr 2021
Posts: 239
Own Kudos:
432
 [14]
Given Kudos: 148
Posts: 239
Kudos: 432
 [14]
12
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
abhishekmayank
Joined: 26 Apr 2016
Last visit: 28 Jan 2024
Posts: 198
Own Kudos:
61
 [4]
Given Kudos: 6
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V33
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V33
Posts: 198
Kudos: 61
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ZoltanBP
gmatt1476
An investment has been growing at a fixed annual rate of 20% since it was first made; no portion of the investment has been withdrawn, and all interest has been reinvested. How much is the investment now worth?

(1) The value of the investment has increased by 44% since it was first made.
(2) If one year ago $600 had been withdrawn, today the investment would be worth 12% less than it is actually now worth.

DS24931.01

The annual growth factor for the investment is 1.2. Let x be the current value of the investment. The original question: x=?

1) We know that the combined growth factor for the investment is 1.44, but no information is given about actual $ values. Thus, we can't get a unique value to answer the original question. \(\implies\) Insufficient

2) We know that the value of the investment was x/1.2 one year ago, and we can set up an equation about the effect of the hypothetical withdrawal.

(x/1.2-600)(1.2)=0.88x

Thus, we could get a unique value to answer the original question. \(\implies\) Sufficient

Answer: B

Although your solution is neat and clean, but I have a question over here. Whether we are not assuming here that interest is getting compounded annually, though the question simply says that rate of interest is annual ?
User avatar
ZoltanBP
Joined: 14 Apr 2017
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 79
Own Kudos:
1,005
 [3]
Given Kudos: 567
Location: Hungary
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
WE:Education (Education)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
Posts: 79
Kudos: 1,005
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
abhishekmayank
Whether we are not assuming here that interest is getting compounded annually, though the question simply says that rate of interest is annual ?

We don't need to assume anything about the compounding frequency of the interest because the 20% rate in the question is a fixed annual growth rate and statement 2) refers to a situation exactly one year ago. A 20% fixed annual growth rate (or a 20% effective annual interest rate) can be achieved with different nominal interest rates with different compounding frequencies.

However, if statement 2) referred to a situation not exactly an integer year ago, then the compounding frequency would have an effect on the answer, and statement 2) would be Insufficient.
User avatar
Jsound996
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 19 Jan 2018
Last visit: 11 Sep 2023
Posts: 103
Own Kudos:
133
 [6]
Given Kudos: 3,158
Products:
Posts: 103
Kudos: 133
 [6]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatt1476
An investment has been growing at a fixed annual rate of 20% since it was first made; no portion of the investment has been withdrawn, and all interest has been reinvested. How much is the investment now worth?

(1) The value of the investment has increased by 44% since it was first made.
(2) If one year ago $600 had been withdrawn, today the investment would be worth 12% less than it is actually now worth.



DS24931.01

If you haven't already, you should know the interest formula \(A = P (1 + r)^t\) (you can discard n because it's only compounded annually, unless stated otherwise)

R= 20%
\(A = P (1.20)^t\)
We are trying to find the Value of A, in order to find A, we need to know P and t.

1.) Value increased by 44%. By using logic, we know that the value increased by 44%, which means we can determine how much time has passed if an investment is earning 20% a year, but we don't know the value because we don't know the starting (P) or current value. INSUFFICENT

2.) Convert Statement 2 into math terms:
(P-600)(1.20)^(t-1) = 0.88[P*(1.20)^t]

Divide the whole equation by 0.88, and then divide (1.20)^(t-1).
(P-600)/0.88 = P(1.20)^t / (1.20)^(t-1)
The t cancels out, and now you can solve for P. SUFFICIENT!

Answer is B
User avatar
abhishekmayank
Joined: 26 Apr 2016
Last visit: 28 Jan 2024
Posts: 198
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V33
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V33
Posts: 198
Kudos: 61
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ZoltanBP
abhishekmayank
Whether we are not assuming here that interest is getting compounded annually, though the question simply says that rate of interest is annual ?

We don't need to assume anything about the compounding frequency of the interest because the 20% rate in the question is a fixed annual growth rate and statement 2) refers to a situation exactly one year ago. A 20% fixed annual growth rate (or a 20% effective annual interest rate) can be achieved with different nominal interest rates with different compounding frequencies.

However, if statement 2) referred to a situation not exactly an integer year ago, then the compounding frequency would have an effect on the answer, and statement 2) would be Insufficient.

Thanks for the answer ! Even for 1 year there is an effect on compounding. Suppose that the interest is getting compounded half yearly then growth factor Each Year will not be 1.2 as mentioned, but would be 1.21 and so the answer will vary.
User avatar
ZoltanBP
Joined: 14 Apr 2017
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 79
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 567
Location: Hungary
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
WE:Education (Education)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
Posts: 79
Kudos: 1,005
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
abhishekmayank
Thanks for the answer ! Even for 1 year there is an effect on compounding. Suppose that the interest is getting compounded half yearly then growth factor Each Year will not be 1.2 as mentioned, but would be 1.21 and so the answer will vary.

The annual growth factor cannot be 1.21 because it's fixed at 1.2 by the 20% fixed annual growth rate.

Whether the 1.2 annual growth factor is the result of a 20% nominal annual interest rate compounded yearly or it is the result of a certain, less than 20% nominal annual interest rate compounded half-yearly doesn't matter because statement 2) refers to a situation exactly one year ago for which we can apply the originally given growth factor.
User avatar
nick1816
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 19 Oct 2018
Last visit: 12 Mar 2026
Posts: 1,841
Own Kudos:
8,505
 [5]
Given Kudos: 707
Location: India
Posts: 1,841
Kudos: 8,505
 [5]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Let P is the principal amount, and investment niw worth is A

Statement 1-
P(1.2)^n=1.44P
n= 2 years
We can't say anything about P or A

Statement 2-
600+(20/100)*600= 0.12* A
We can find A



gmatt1476
An investment has been growing at a fixed annual rate of 20% since it was first made; no portion of the investment has been withdrawn, and all interest has been reinvested. How much is the investment now worth?

(1) The value of the investment has increased by 44% since it was first made.
(2) If one year ago $600 had been withdrawn, today the investment would be worth 12% less than it is actually now worth.



DS24931.01
User avatar
reynaldreni
Joined: 07 May 2015
Last visit: 02 Nov 2022
Posts: 73
Own Kudos:
144
 [7]
Given Kudos: 152
Location: India
Schools: Darden '21
GPA: 4
Schools: Darden '21
Posts: 73
Kudos: 144
 [7]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatt1476
An investment has been growing at a fixed annual rate of 20% since it was first made; no portion of the investment has been withdrawn, and all interest has been reinvested. How much is the investment now worth?

(1) The value of the investment has increased by 44% since it was first made.
(2) If one year ago $600 had been withdrawn, today the investment would be worth 12% less than it is actually now worth.

DS24931.01


Let P be the inital amount, n be the no. of yrs and A be the current worth
Given r = 20%
We need to find the value of "A"

(1) The value of the investment has increased by 44% since it was first made.
A = (1.44)P --(p)
We know that, A = P*(1.2)^n --(q)
based eq (p) and (q) we can deduce the value of 'n'.
But we still need value of P to find "A"
Hence, Insufficient.

(2) If one year ago $600 had been withdrawn, today the investment would be worth 12% less than it is actually now worth.
Let K be the value of the investment one year ago.
K - 600 = (0.88)A --(m)
also, K(1.2) = A --(n)
based on eq (m) and (n) both value of K and A can be computed
Hence, Sufficient

OA <-- B


User avatar
Basshead
Joined: 09 Jan 2020
Last visit: 07 Feb 2024
Posts: 907
Own Kudos:
323
 [1]
Given Kudos: 431
Location: United States
Posts: 907
Kudos: 323
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
An investment has been growing at a fixed annual rate of 20% since it was first made; no portion of the investment has been withdrawn, and all interest has been reinvested. How much is the investment now worth?

(1) The value of the investment has increased by 44% since it was first made.
(2) If one year ago $600 had been withdrawn, today the investment would be worth 12% less than it is actually now worth.


(1) Clearly insufficient

(2)

Let \(x\) = how much investment was worth one year ago
\(1.2x\) = how much the investment is worth now

We're told that if $600 is withdrawn one year ago, the investment would be worth 12% less than what it's worth today.

We can let \((x-600)\) represent the $600 withdrawn.

\(1.2(x-600) = 1.2x - 720\)
\(1.2x - 720\) is \(12%\) less than \(1.2x\).

\(1.2x - 720 = (0.88)(1.2x)\)
We can then solve for \(x\) and determine the value of \(1.2x\).

SUFFICIENT.

Answer is B.
User avatar
Will2020
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 24 Jan 2017
Last visit: 04 Mar 2022
Posts: 130
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,120
Location: Brazil
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE:Consulting (Healthcare/Pharmaceuticals)
Products:
Posts: 130
Kudos: 54
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ZoltanBP
gmatt1476
An investment has been growing at a fixed annual rate of 20% since it was first made; no portion of the investment has been withdrawn, and all interest has been reinvested. How much is the investment now worth?

(1) The value of the investment has increased by 44% since it was first made.
(2) If one year ago $600 had been withdrawn, today the investment would be worth 12% less than it is actually now worth.

DS24931.01

The annual growth factor for the investment is 1.2. Let x be the current value of the investment. The original question: x=?

1) We know that the combined growth factor for the investment is 1.44, but no information is given about actual $ values. Thus, we can't get a unique value to answer the original question. \(\implies\) Insufficient

2) We know that the value of the investment was x/1.2 one year ago, and we can set up an equation about the effect of the hypothetical withdrawal.

(x/1.2-600)(1.2)=0.88x

Thus, we could get a unique value to answer the original question. \(\implies\) Sufficient

Answer: B

Hi ZoltanBP! Why are you dividing "x" per "1.2" in the second statement? Why not just x? Tks! :thumbsup:
User avatar
ZoltanBP
Joined: 14 Apr 2017
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 79
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 567
Location: Hungary
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
WE:Education (Education)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
Posts: 79
Kudos: 1,005
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Will2020
Why are you dividing "x" per "1.2" in the second statement? Why not just x?

Because growth factor = new value / old value, it must be true that old value = new value / growth factor. In my solution, x is the new value, and 1.2 is the annual growth factor, so the old value, or the value of the invetsment one year ago, must be x/1.2.
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,437
Own Kudos:
79,367
 [7]
Given Kudos: 484
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,437
Kudos: 79,367
 [7]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatt1476
An investment has been growing at a fixed annual rate of 20% since it was first made; no portion of the investment has been withdrawn, and all interest has been reinvested. How much is the investment now worth?

(1) The value of the investment has increased by 44% since it was first made.
(2) If one year ago $600 had been withdrawn, today the investment would be worth 12% less than it is actually now worth.

DS24931.01

The investment is compounded. We need the amount now.
Annual rate of interest, r = 20%

(1) The value of the investment has increased by 44% since it was first made.

This means that the investment has completed 2 yrs (20% compounded over 2 yrs will give 44%). But we don't know the principal. We don't know how much was invested. So we don't know what it has become now. Not sufficient alone.

(2) If one year ago $600 had been withdrawn, today the investment would be worth 12% less than it is actually now worth.

If one year ago, 600 had been withdrawn, today the investment would be less by 600 and by the interest earned in the year on this 600 (which is 20% of 600 i.e. 120). So the total investment amount would have been less by $720 today. This 720 is 12% of the amount i.e.
12% of Total Amount = 720
Total Amount = $6000
Sufficient alone. (Note that we don't really need to do these calculations in the actual exam but we should know that we can calculate the total amount)

Answer (B)
User avatar
Will2020
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 24 Jan 2017
Last visit: 04 Mar 2022
Posts: 130
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,120
Location: Brazil
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE:Consulting (Healthcare/Pharmaceuticals)
Products:
Posts: 130
Kudos: 54
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KarishmaB
gmatt1476
An investment has been growing at a fixed annual rate of 20% since it was first made; no portion of the investment has been withdrawn, and all interest has been reinvested. How much is the investment now worth?

(1) The value of the investment has increased by 44% since it was first made.
(2) If one year ago $600 had been withdrawn, today the investment would be worth 12% less than it is actually now worth.



DS24931.01

The investment is compounded. We need the amount now.
Annual rate of interest, r = 20%


(1) The value of the investment has increased by 44% since it was first made.

This means that the investment has completed 2 yrs (20% compounded over 2 yrs will give 44%). But we don't know the principal. We don't know how much was invested. So we don't know what it has become now. Not sufficient alone.

(2) If one year ago $600 had been withdrawn, today the investment would be worth 12% less than it is actually now worth.

If one year ago, 600 had been withdrawn, today the investment would be less by 600 and by the interest earned in the year on this 600 (which is 20% of 600 i.e. 120). So the total investment amount would have been less by $720 today. This 720 is 12% of the amount i.e.
12% of Total Amount = 720
Total Amount = $6000
Sufficient alone. (Note that we don't really need to do these calculations in the actual exam but we should know that we can calculate the total amount)

Answer (B)

Will2020

Hi KarishmaB! Regarding statement (1), I did some quick math to understand your explanation that 20% compounded in 2 years will give 44%. In fact, I used a smart number - $100 compounded by 20% annually - generating an amount of $144 (44% more than $100); but how can I realize that faster? How did you rationalise this? Thank you! :please:
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,437
Own Kudos:
79,367
 [2]
Given Kudos: 484
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,437
Kudos: 79,367
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Will2020
KarishmaB
gmatt1476
An investment has been growing at a fixed annual rate of 20% since it was first made; no portion of the investment has been withdrawn, and all interest has been reinvested. How much is the investment now worth?

(1) The value of the investment has increased by 44% since it was first made.
(2) If one year ago $600 had been withdrawn, today the investment would be worth 12% less than it is actually now worth.



DS24931.01

The investment is compounded. We need the amount now.
Annual rate of interest, r = 20%


(1) The value of the investment has increased by 44% since it was first made.

This means that the investment has completed 2 yrs (20% compounded over 2 yrs will give 44%). But we don't know the principal. We don't know how much was invested. So we don't know what it has become now. Not sufficient alone.

(2) If one year ago $600 had been withdrawn, today the investment would be worth 12% less than it is actually now worth.

If one year ago, 600 had been withdrawn, today the investment would be less by 600 and by the interest earned in the year on this 600 (which is 20% of 600 i.e. 120). So the total investment amount would have been less by $720 today. This 720 is 12% of the amount i.e.
12% of Total Amount = 720
Total Amount = $6000
Sufficient alone. (Note that we don't really need to do these calculations in the actual exam but we should know that we can calculate the total amount)

Answer (B)

Will2020

Hi KarishmaB! Regarding statement (1), I did some quick math to understand your explanation that 20% compounded in 2 years will give 44%. In fact, I used a smart number - $100 compounded by 20% annually - generating an amount of $144 (44% more than $100); but how can I realize that faster? How did you rationalise this? Thank you! :please:

It it were simple interest, we would have seen an increase of 20% every year and hence in 2 years, the amount would have increased by 40%, in 3 years by 60% and so on.
Since it is compound interest, the amount will increase by 20% at the end of first year but at the end of second year, it will be somewhat more than 40%. Had 3 years passed, then the amount would have increased by more than 60%. Since we know that the amount increased by 44%, it stands to reason that 2 years must have passed. Also, (6/5)*(6/5) = 36/25 = 144/100 (a successive increase of 20%s gives an effective increase of 44%) or we can use the formula (Total increases is (a + b + ab/100)% where a = 20 and b = 20)

Once you practice enough questions, you are able to quickly relate simple numbers.
User avatar
rxb266
Joined: 30 Nov 2018
Last visit: 27 Jun 2024
Posts: 138
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 79
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GPA: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Answer OPTION B

Official explanation -


Attachment:
answer.JPG
answer.JPG [ 123.61 KiB | Viewed 9641 times ]
User avatar
Rebaz
Joined: 14 Feb 2014
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 145
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4,772
Posts: 145
Kudos: 38
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Let x = how much investment was worth one year ago
1.2x= how much the investment is worth now

We're told that if $600 is withdrawn one year ago, the investment would be worth 12% less than what it's worth today.

We can let (x−600) represent the $600 withdrawn.

1.2(x−600)=1.2x−720


Can anyone please explain where this 720 come from?

Thanks in advance!
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,701
Own Kudos:
810,285
 [1]
Given Kudos: 105,779
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,701
Kudos: 810,285
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Rebaz
Let x = how much investment was worth one year ago
1.2x= how much the investment is worth now

We're told that if $600 is withdrawn one year ago, the investment would be worth 12% less than what it's worth today.

We can let (x−600) represent the $600 withdrawn.

1.2(x−600)=1.2x−720


Can anyone please explain where this 720 come from?

Thanks in advance!

$600 was withdrawn a year ago. This amount, in one year at a 20% interest rate, would amount to $600*1.2 = $720.
User avatar
shvm_sin7
Joined: 24 May 2024
Last visit: 12 Apr 2026
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 92
Posts: 25
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
But we need to Know the value of T also to find the current final value of investment, how will one proceed after finding P only??
Quote:
ss
Jsound996
Quote:
gmatt1476
An investment has been growing at a fixed annual rate of 20% since it was first made; no portion of the investment has been withdrawn, and all interest has been reinvested. How much is the investment now worth?

(1) The value of the investment has increased by 44% since it was first made.
(2) If one year ago $600 had been withdrawn, today the investment would be worth 12% less than it is actually now worth.



DS24931.01

If you haven't already, you should know the interest formula \(A = P (1 + r)^t\) (you can discard n because it's only compounded annually, unless stated otherwise)

R= 20%
\(A = P (1.20)^t\)
We are trying to find the Value of A, in order to find A, we need to know P and t.

1.) Value increased by 44%. By using logic, we know that the value increased by 44%, which means we can determine how much time has passed if an investment is earning 20% a year, but we don't know the value because we don't know the starting (P) or current value. INSUFFICENT

2.) Convert Statement 2 into math terms:
(P-600)(1.20)^(t-1) = 0.88[P*(1.20)^t]

Divide the whole equation by 0.88, and then divide (1.20)^(t-1).
(P-600)/0.88 = P(1.20)^t / (1.20)^(t-1)
The t cancels out, and now you can solve for P. SUFFICIENT!

Answer is B
 1   2   
Moderators:
Math Expert
109701 posts
498 posts
210 posts