Last visit was: 22 Apr 2026, 06:29 It is currently 22 Apr 2026, 06:29
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
akela
Joined: 30 Jan 2016
Last visit: 23 May 2023
Posts: 1,227
Own Kudos:
6,347
 [7]
Given Kudos: 128
Products:
Posts: 1,227
Kudos: 6,347
 [7]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
saurabh4098
Joined: 04 Jul 2018
Last visit: 30 Dec 2019
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 24
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V29
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V29
Posts: 5
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
auradediligodo
Joined: 31 Jan 2019
Last visit: 18 Nov 2021
Posts: 358
Own Kudos:
861
 [2]
Given Kudos: 67
Location: Switzerland
Concentration: General Management
GPA: 3.9
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
honey1
Joined: 25 Sep 2020
Last visit: 12 May 2021
Posts: 52
Own Kudos:
6
 [1]
Given Kudos: 76
Posts: 52
Kudos: 6
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
hello
i am very weak in critical reasoning and i want your precious advice
in this question how can we eliminate option c as it says should be regarded with great skepticism and the author also says that the researchers cannot cannot rely upon the report which means they should regard it with great skepticism
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,490
Own Kudos:
7,661
 [2]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,490
Kudos: 7,661
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
honey1
hello
i am very weak in critical reasoning and i want your precious advice
in this question how can we eliminate option c as it says should be regarded with great skepticism and the author also says that the researchers cannot cannot rely upon the report which means they should regard it with great skepticism
Hello, honey1. First off, I would like to point out that this is an LSAT question. Although it is written well for that test, and it can serve as supplemental practice for a GMAT™ CR question, you should look to center your studies on official GMAT™ material. Logical reasoning on the LSAT tends to rely more on formal logic. With that said, choice (C) is a relatively easy elimination, since the conclusion that the results of brain-scanning research should be regarded with great skepticism is the opposite of what the author of the passage is driving at. Transitions and strong language can help us follow that point or conclusion.

Akela
Brain-scanning technology provides information about processes occurring in the brain. For this information to help researchers understand how the brain enables us to think, however, researchers must be able to rely on the accuracy of the verbal reports given by subjects while their brains are being scanned. Otherwise brain-scan data gathered at a given moment might not contain information about what the subject reports thinking about at that moment, but instead about some different set of thoughts.

In the context of the passage, must be able is akin to need to be able, which is a call for accurate verbal reports, but not a statement against the accuracy of all current verbal reports. The transition otherwise provides a hypothetical scenario in which brain-scan data and verbal reports do not match up, but again, this is not a declaration of how the current process is flawed. If we examine choice (E), we can see how the conditional only if statement parallels the second sentence of the passage. Compare:

Akela
(E) Information from brain scans can help researchers understand how the brain enables us to think only if the verbal reports of those whose brains are being scanned are accurate.
Now, the passage:

Akela
For this information [from brain-scanning technology] to help researchers understand how the brain enables us to think, however, researchers must be able to rely on the accuracy of the verbal reports given by subjects while their brains are being scanned.

I considered choice (D) for a moment—I like its use of vague, non-committal language—but it distorts the information in the passage when it says that brain scans can shed light on the accuracy of the verbal reports. Perhaps indirectly, but whether you are dealing with a logical reasoning question or a critical reasoning question, you want the most direct answer you can find, one that is both anchored in the passage and answers the question being asked.

I hope that helps. If you have further questions, feel free to ask.

- Andrew
User avatar
tinbq
Joined: 04 Nov 2016
Last visit: 26 May 2024
Posts: 115
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 599
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.12
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V38
Posts: 115
Kudos: 24
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi experts,
Please help us to understand reason why each choice is right or wrong. Thank you so much.
User avatar
prateekchugh
Joined: 05 Aug 2017
Last visit: 27 Sep 2021
Posts: 357
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 277
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
WE:Engineering (Energy)
Posts: 357
Kudos: 591
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KAPLAN OFFICIAL EXPLANATION

(E) Main Point
When reading an argument in a Main Point question, look for a strong statement of the author’s point of view.
We need to treat arguments in Main Point questions like short Reading Comp passages: the key is to read critically to home in on the author’s point. “However” in the second sentence should leap out as an indicator of authorial opinion. Brain-scanning technology shows us what’s going on in the brain, but the author tells us that for brain scans to provide information about how we think, researchers must be able to trust the verbal reports given by subjects during the scanning process. The next sentence, beginning with “otherwise,” tells us what could happen if that necessary condition is not met, so the middle sentence must be the main idea of the argument. (E) is a lovely summary of that main idea.

(A) The author doesn’t conclude that brain scans will never help researchers understand the way we think. The author just tells us what must happen for researchers to effectively utilize brain scans.

(B) The author says that researchers must be able to trust the accuracy of subjects’ reports, which certainly implies that there could be a way for them to know for certain that the reports are accurate.

(C) The author doesn’t conclude that brain scan results should be regarded with skepticism, just that their results can be used for research purposes only if subjects are truthfully and accurately reporting their thoughts.

(D) The author’s point isn’t that brain scans can tell us whether subjects are giving accurate verbal reports; it’s that the accuracy of those reports have to be trusted for the information in brain scans to be of use to researchers.
User avatar
tinbq
Joined: 04 Nov 2016
Last visit: 26 May 2024
Posts: 115
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 599
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.12
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V38
Posts: 115
Kudos: 24
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
prateekchugh
KAPLAN OFFICIAL EXPLANATION

(E) Main Point
When reading an argument in a Main Point question, look for a strong statement of the author’s point of view.
We need to treat arguments in Main Point questions like short Reading Comp passages: the key is to read critically to home in on the author’s point. “However” in the second sentence should leap out as an indicator of authorial opinion. Brain-scanning technology shows us what’s going on in the brain, but the author tells us that for brain scans to provide information about how we think, researchers must be able to trust the verbal reports given by subjects during the scanning process. The next sentence, beginning with “otherwise,” tells us what could happen if that necessary condition is not met, so the middle sentence must be the main idea of the argument. (E) is a lovely summary of that main idea.

(A) The author doesn’t conclude that brain scans will never help researchers understand the way we think. The author just tells us what must happen for researchers to effectively utilize brain scans.

(B) The author says that researchers must be able to trust the accuracy of subjects’ reports, which certainly implies that there could be a way for them to know for certain that the reports are accurate.

(C) The author doesn’t conclude that brain scan results should be regarded with skepticism, just that their results can be used for research purposes only if subjects are truthfully and accurately reporting their thoughts.

(D) The author’s point isn’t that brain scans can tell us whether subjects are giving accurate verbal reports; it’s that the accuracy of those reports have to be trusted for the information in brain scans to be of use to researchers.

Hi prateekchugh,
Could you please explain more why C is wrong. Thank you.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,421
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,421
Kudos: 1,009
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
496 posts
358 posts