It is absolutely clear that the winner has to be out of C and E.
What I believe is that C uses an assumption that a large proportion of people buy gasoline powered bikes because of the roaring sound of the exhaust and they will continue to do so in the near future.
But E on the other hand is making an assumption that because last year, young riders didn't like electric motorcycles, the trend may not continue in the next decade and their preferences might change.
So, In C, we are assuming that the trend will continue while in E, we are assuming that the trend might not continue.
Quite contradictory. I believe E equally weakens the the argument.
My reasoning:
Conclusion is: Electric motorcycles will ALMOST ENTIRELY replace gasoline powered bikes.
We have to weaken this.
So, we can say that there are reasons that this conclusion might not hold true.
C says:Large number of People base their decision to buy on the basis of the sound of the exhaust. OK, SO WE ARE ASSUMING that they will continue to do so in the future and thus it's less likely that electric vehicles will replace gasoline powered ones. We are also assuming that future electric motorcycles will not be able to replicate the sound of the exhaust made by gasoline powered motorcycles.
E says: Young riders, who will make a large percentage of the buyers in the coming decade, don't find electric motorcycle popular. This is according to past sales data. OK, SO, WE CAN ASSUME that in the next decade or so, this popularity might not increase. Despite the fact that changes will be made to electric motorcycles, the bikes might not become popular and therefore, electric motorcycles will still not almost completely replace gasoline powered motorcycles.
Please let me know if i have to elaborate further. Any help is appreciated to understand the nuances in C and E and what kind of assumptions we can/cannot make while arriving at the answer.
MartyTargetTestPrepGMATNinja generis