DUnada
Doesn't choice D change the meaning of the sentence:
D. The first Homo erectus, or early human, to be identified was found in the 1890s by Dutch anatomist Eugene Dubois, but it was not followed by another such identification for over twenty years
The first Homo erectus was identified in the 1890's by Eugene Dubois, not necessarily found in the 1890's by Eugene Dubois.
The first Homo erectus could have been found by someone else or been unable to be identified.
Hello
DUnada,
We hope this finds you well.
Having gone through the question and your query, we believe we can help resolve your doubts.
Your assessment is correct that Option D conveys that Eugene Dubois found the Homo Erectus, but does not convey that he identified it; however, this is, in fact, the intended meaning. Options B, D, and E all identify "Eugene Dubois" as the one who
found the Homo Erectus, as conveyed through the constructions "Eugene Dubois found the first Homo erectus" (B), "was found in the 1890s by Dutch anatomist Eugene Dubois" (D), and "it was found in the 1890s by Dutch anatomist Eugene" (E). By contrast, Option A uses the construction "the first Homo erectus...to be identified was in the 1890s by...Eugene Dubois"; the construction of this phrase leads to an incoherent meaning; it does not identify "Eugene Dubois" as the one who identified the Homo Erectus. Similarly, Option C incorrectly uses "identified by...Eugene Dubois in the 1890s" to modify "the identification", illogically implying the Eugene Dubois identified the identification of the Homo Erectus; please remember, in a “phrase + comma + noun” construction, the phrase must correctly modify the noun; this is one of the most frequently tested concepts on GMAT sentence correction. Thus, there is no answer choice that conveys the meaning that Eugene Dubois was the one to find the Homo Erectus.
Hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team