OFFICIAL EXPLANATIONProject SC Butler: Sentence Correction (SC1)
THE PROMPTQuote:
Hans
Krasa had only begun to emerge as a celebrated composer, having written the short fairy tale opera Brundibar, when the grips of Nazism took their hold and rendered his additional developing as a composer impossible.
THE OPTIONSQuote:
A) Krasa had only begun to emerge as a celebrated composer, having written the short fairy tale opera Brundibar, when the grips of Nazism took their hold and rendered his additional
developing as a composer
• this sentence is grammatical, but the word
developing bothers me
→ on the GMAT and in good writing generally, if a dedicated noun exists, it is preferred to a gerund (a verbING noun)
KEEP, but look for a better answer
Quote:
B) Krasa had
only hardly begun to emerge as a celebrated composer, having written a short fairy tale opera by the name of Brundibar, when the grips of Nazism took their hold and rendered his
farther professional development
•
only hardly is redundant - in this context, both mean "just barely"
• The word farther should be further.
→
farther is used when referring to distance.
→
further means to a greater extent.
Here are two mnemonics that might make the distinction easier to remember:
(1)
go further with all but distance(2) fArther is for distAnce, whereas fUrther is for everything else
ELIMINATE B
Quote:
C) Krasa had
not hardly begun to emerge as a celebrated composer, having written a short fairy tale opera by the name of Brundibar, when the grips of Nazism took their hold and rendered his
developing into a better composer
• there is no such thing as "not hardly." Ever. You cannot use this phrase.
→
hardly means "just barely" or "almost not."
→ adding the word
not to
hardly creates a double negative
• as in option A, the word
developing is not as good as the dedicated noun form
developmentELIMINATE C
Quote:
D) Krasa
, who wrote the short fairy tale opera Brundibar
, had
not hardly begun to emerge as a
celebratory composer when he
was taken hold by the grips of Nazism and his further professional development
was rendered
Wow. This sentence is a hot mess.
• we need commas around the who-clause because its information is not essential or restrictive
→ who-clauses without commas
are essential, help us to identify
which person we are reading about, and are not set off by commas.
But we know the man's name. The who-clause is extra information.
• as in option C, the phrase
not hardly is not a real or correct expression
•
celebratory and
celebrated do not mean the same thing, and
celebratory is illogical.
→
celebratory means festive
→
celebrated means renowned, well-received, admired
Krasa was emerging as a greatly admired composer, not a festive composer.
• the sentence is unnecessarily written in passive voice
→ he
was taken hold by and his further development
was rendered impossible.
ELIMINATE D
Quote:
E) Krasa, who wrote the short fairy tale opera Brundibar, had only begun to emerge as a celebrated composer when the grips of Nazism took their hold and rendered his further professional development
• I see no errors
• the who-clause, which is restrictive and thus requires commas, is set off by commas
• the dedicated noun
development is used rather than the not-preferred
developing• the language is clear and concise
Compared to (A), which is still on the table?
Option E is better than option A:
→
development, a dedicated noun, is preferred to
developing The correct answer is E.COMMENTSsriharsha63 and
Josephat1 , welcome to SC Butler.
I like to drill small details into your minds;
developing versus
development is one such detail.
It is one thing to read my statement that "a dedicated noun is preferred to a gerund."
It is another thing entirely to work on questions that contain concrete examples of the detail.
These answers range from good to excellent.
I see lively prose in which small glimpses of personality are evident—and I like both very much.
Low levels of explanation get smiley faces.
Good explanations get kudos.
Nicely done.
sriharsha63 , I am bumping you to Best Community Reply.