Thank you for jumping in. I am sorry, you are right. I did not mean to come off in anyway disrespectful. If you have a family, it is very hard to live off student loans.
PS. I did not realize those executives did a part-time MBA. I think they did OK 😂
I would not say pursuing a part-time program is finding a loop hole as much as it is utilizing an opportunity to pursue the same degree without sacrificing employment. For those of us who have decent paying positions and families, the thought of picking everything up, leaving a good job, and moving to a place where you have virtually zero income is virtually impossible. This is where the part-time programs come in.
Without coming across as offended, I do get quite annoyed when people say that part-time programs are inferior which is far from the truth. Just because one attends part-time instead of full-time does not take away from the learning. The diplomas are the exact same, the professors are the exact same, and in the majority of cases, the curriculum is the exact same. Let’s not forget that Satya Nadella (Microsoft CEO) and Tim Cook (Apple CEO) did Part-Time MBAs at Booth and Fuqua respectively.
bb
Congratulations on your admit and welcome to GMAT Club!
It is a long weekend so I am not sure how much traction will be until tomorrow but this should be a pretty straightforward take, and sorry for being banal, since we are comparing apples and oranges.
My biggest concerns about attending a FEMBA are the following:
- PT MBA is not recommended if you are changing industries/roles. There is no provision for an internship and that is something very helpful for the final job success. There is no formal summer internship which for some areas makes it a lot easier to recruit.
- FEMBA is a lot easier to get into. If you compare FT and PT programs, you will notice the difference in stats and parameters since the market for PT folks is fairly local and limited. This is a loophole to get a great brand-name MBA by trading off FT experience vs. PT. It seems to be odd to be doing a PT program while you have a FT admit at HBS. My point is that you would be surrounded by a different caliber of classmates that may or may not be stimulating or challenging
- FEMBA provides limited recruiting options (sort of mentioned in the #1 above) but you can't attend the recruiting events. Often, you are not even invited because schools prioritize their FT students for those and don't want PT students filling in spots. On the flip side, there is not really on-campus recruiting for consulting or IB at Anderson. This is the plight of most West-coast schools.
- My biggest and last argument is doing 2 things well at the same time is hard. It is hard to do school and work for 3 years well. Something is likely going to take a dip now and then. Sometimes your work effort may be compromised and sometimes it may be your school and learning. Doing school for 3 years is a lot if you want to switch careers at the end. You are potentially delaying yourself a year. However, the biggest issue is that while you can manage to do school and work at the same time and balance them OK, you will need to also be recruiting and that is a whole separate world. That would be like doing 4 things at the same time. Most people doing FEMBA end up compromising on recruiting and don't end up doing their best. It is understandable too and not because they are lazy but just because something has to give and that's what does. Also, having a nice enough job and thus not having the deadline of graduating and needing to desperately find a job, also creates this backup option that allows you to fall back and not feel the urgency. Something I did and I know at least one other MBA, is we quit our safe jobs so we could have more time networking and recruiting. I worked on campus during my second year in business school and it provided extra income and was a job I really loved and excelled at but it was not an MBA-level job. I went for months not able to recruit. Eventually, I just quit it and within 2 weeks I had another job lined up. I don't think it was accidental per se.
I would strongly recommend to look at the benefits of the FT program such as the transofrmative power it has (which PT usually does not), the growth you would experience, and the network you would build by being committed full time. I understand it is a plunge and a lot of money and a lot less safe, which is even harder if you have a family but I would recommend talking to students and alums about that aspect and that concern/risk and how they coped wiht it. Part of the reason FT program is so powerful and transformative is that the stakes are high. It is hard to be fully committed or involved if there is no risk.
My vote goes strongly towards the ultimate program

Posted from my mobile device