Last visit was: 25 Apr 2026, 11:59 It is currently 25 Apr 2026, 11:59
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,830
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,885
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,830
Kudos: 811,248
 [31]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
29
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Scuven
Joined: 26 Jun 2018
Last visit: 06 Mar 2023
Posts: 59
Own Kudos:
29
 [1]
Given Kudos: 143
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V35
GMAT 2: 490 Q25 V32
GMAT 2: 490 Q25 V32
Posts: 59
Kudos: 29
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
chaitnya10
Joined: 21 Feb 2021
Last visit: 19 Feb 2023
Posts: 110
Own Kudos:
39
 [1]
Given Kudos: 13
Location: India
Schools: ISB '20 (I)
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V34
GPA: 4
Schools: ISB '20 (I)
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V34
Posts: 110
Kudos: 39
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
kalyanchilaka
Joined: 14 Dec 2020
Last visit: 09 Aug 2023
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 2
Kudos: 1
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
We can arrive at the solution through the process of elimination,

A. At least one-third of the group of people who did not complete the qualifying course would today be earning more than $80,000 a year if they had completed the course.-The argument concludes that education=>high salary, but does not suggest that education would definitely effect 1/3rd of the group Eliminate

C. Most of those people who did not complete the course did so entirely because of the cost of the course.-Out of scope-Eliminate

D. As a group, those persons who completed the course are more competent as mechanics than the group that did not.-The argument does not mention anything related to competency of mechanics-Eliminate

E. The group of people who did not complete the qualifying course and who today earn more than $80,000 a year are more capable than the group that completed the course.The argument does not mention anything related to the capability of mechanics-Eliminate

Since A,C,D and E are eliminated B is correct.
User avatar
ak2121
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 26 Jun 2021
Last visit: 19 May 2022
Posts: 50
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 89
Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q45 V35
GPA: 3.3
GMAT 1: 650 Q45 V35
Posts: 50
Kudos: 56
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Scuven
It's a cause effect assumption question.

The cause is education, the effect is higher salary.

The assumption for the conclusion to be true is that education must be the ONLY cause, that every time the cause happens, the effect does too.

B might be tempting, We should ask our-selves, should graduated mechanics and not-graduated mechanics be comparable under factors for salary increase for the conclusion to be true? The answer I think it's yes, because if there are OTHER CAUSES then data are not comparable and thus the hypotized causal effect in the conclusion can't hold.

A on the other way might be tempting too, but if you try to negate you could say that "less than 1/3 of people increased their salary after graduating". It still suggest a causal - effect relationship even if it's weak. Thus B
Can you pls elaborate on how to eliminate A?
B is the answer that sounds better for sure, but I cannot come up with an apt reason to eliminate A.
User avatar
Anupama_1090
Joined: 16 Apr 2023
Last visit: 17 Jan 2025
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
7
 [1]
Given Kudos: 82
Posts: 18
Kudos: 7
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ak2121
Scuven
It's a cause effect assumption question.

The cause is education, the effect is higher salary.

The assumption for the conclusion to be true is that education must be the ONLY cause, that every time the cause happens, the effect does too.

B might be tempting, We should ask our-selves, should graduated mechanics and not-graduated mechanics be comparable under factors for salary increase for the conclusion to be true? The answer I think it's yes, because if there are OTHER CAUSES then data are not comparable and thus the hypotized causal effect in the conclusion can't hold.

A on the other way might be tempting too, but if you try to negate you could say that "less than 1/3 of people increased their salary after graduating". It still suggest a causal - effect relationship even if it's weak. Thus B
Can you pls elaborate on how to eliminate A?
B is the answer that sounds better for sure, but I cannot come up with an apt reason to eliminate A.
Hi,
I think it cannot be the answer as for A to happen we have to work out from the argument to determine this option and it looks to be an inference answer than an assumption answer. Assumption should be the hidden premise something that is not stated but must be necessary for the conclusion to hold true. Also if we calculate A it works out to somewhere 31.5% which is not 1/3rd as stated in the option A. Requesting expert reply on this.
Thank you.
User avatar
catcun
Joined: 07 Aug 2025
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 22
Given Kudos: 234
Posts: 22
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
egmat if negated, doesn't A seem to be a more crucial assumption than B?
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 5,632
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 707
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,632
Kudos: 33,435
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The real question isn't "Does it hurt?" but "Can the argument survive without it?"

Negate B: "The two groups are NOT comparable in pay-determining factors."
The argument dies immediately. Maybe course-completers were already more experienced, talented, or worked in better markets. The 35% vs 10% difference proves nothing about the course itself.

Negate A: "Fewer than one-third would benefit from taking the course."
The argument survives. Okay, maybe only 20% would benefit instead of 33%. The education still matters - just less universally than implied. The gap between 35% and 10% can still show importance.

The Judge Test
Scenario 1 (B is false): "Your Honor, we're comparing elite mechanics to beginners. This comparison is worthless."
→ Case dismissed. No evidence.

Scenario 2 (A is false): "Your Honor, maybe 20% benefit, not 33%."
→ Case continues. Education still matters, just debating how much.

catcun
egmat if negated, doesn't A seem to be a more crucial assumption than B?
User avatar
vasu1104
Joined: 10 Feb 2023
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 395
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 664
Location: Canada
Products:
Posts: 395
Kudos: 237
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Conclusion- figure shows importance of technical edu in getting higher salary.
reason= with owning garage and completed course, 35% earn above 80000 year
with owning garage but not completing course, only 10% earn above 80000

A this somewhat strengthen it as well
B yup. if thats measuring factor then it make sense to make that assumption
C. cost is irrelevant
D it strengthen it
E wrong comparison

Bunuel
Among those automobile mechanics who own their own garages and completed a qualifying course at Main Street Technical School, 35% earn above $80,000 a year. Among those who own their own garages but did not complete the qualifying course at Main Street Technical School, only 10% earn above $80,000 a year. These figures indicate the importance of technical education in getting a higher salary.

The argument above depends on which of the following assumptions about the people mentioned in the statistics?

A. At least one-third of the group of people who did not complete the qualifying course would today be earning more than $80,000 a year if they had completed the course.

B. The group of people who did not complete the qualifying course and the group who did are comparable in terms of factors that determine how much people are paid.

C. Most of those people who did not complete the course did so entirely because of the cost of the course.

D. As a group, those persons who completed the course are more competent as mechanics than the group that did not.

E. The group of people who did not complete the qualifying course and who today earn more than $80,000 a year are more capable than the group that completed the course.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
506 posts
361 posts