Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 11:35 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 11:35
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
trulyness
Joined: 28 May 2021
Last visit: 17 Sep 2022
Posts: 33
Own Kudos:
150
 [14]
Given Kudos: 20
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V38
Products:
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V38
Posts: 33
Kudos: 150
 [14]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
11
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
unraveled
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 10 Apr 2025
Posts: 2,706
Own Kudos:
2,328
 [1]
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy)
Posts: 2,706
Kudos: 2,328
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
smbbourne007
Joined: 19 Sep 2020
Last visit: 04 Feb 2025
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
8
 [1]
Given Kudos: 508
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GMAT 1: 650 Q48 V31 (Online)
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V35
GPA: 3.8
WE:Engineering (Computer Software)
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V35
Posts: 19
Kudos: 8
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ViharSaladi
Joined: 19 Mar 2022
Last visit: 08 Feb 2024
Posts: 37
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 91
Location: India
Schools: ISB '24
GPA: 4
Schools: ISB '24
Posts: 37
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Except E, all remaining options can be eliminated. However, E doesn't look very promising to me. Should I presume that defective pieces have more weight per piece than that of good ones? It may or may not be.
User avatar
Pray2K
Joined: 01 Jan 2025
Last visit: 19 Sep 2025
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 27
Posts: 23
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I have a doubt:

As the question mentions Unsaleable Garments are 7% of the total production.
The recycled scrap is reported as 9%.
Logically should this considered as 9% of (the 7% Unsaleable Garments); which amount to 0.63%. Thus A will fit more here?
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 7,391
Own Kudos:
70,793
 [2]
Given Kudos: 2,129
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,391
Kudos: 70,793
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Prayag2
I have a doubt:

As the question mentions Unsaleable Garments are 7% of the total production.

The recycled scrap is reported as 9%.

Logically should this considered as 9% of (the 7% Unsaleable Garments); which amount to 0.63%. Thus A will fit more here?
If we go with that interpretation, there would be no discrepancy to explain! And notice that the passage says, "the percentage of garments reported as recycled scrap is 9 percent" and not "the percentage of unsalable garments reported as recycled scrap is 9 percent".

The clothing manufacturer reports three things:

  1. 7 percent of the garments produced are unsalable.
  2. 9 percent of the garments produced are reported as recycled scrap.
  3. ALL unsalable garments are recycled as scrap.

If ALL unsalable garments are recycled as scrap, shouldn't the second figure be 7 percent instead of 9 percent? Why do we have two different numbers if were talking about the same portion of the garments?

Choice (E) provides an explanation:

  • If 7 out of 100 garments are unsalable, that represents 7 percent based on COUNT of garments.
  • Let's say those 100 garments weigh a total of 10,000 grams (100 grams per garment on average). The 7 unsalable garments might weight a total of 900 grams (about 129 grams on average, which is a bit higher than the overall average).
  • So by COUNT, those 7 garments represent 7% of the total. But by WEIGHT those same 7 garments represent 9% of the total.

That explains why there are two different figures: one is based on count and the other is based on weight.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
Pray2K
Joined: 01 Jan 2025
Last visit: 19 Sep 2025
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 27
Posts: 23
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Yes. Thanks a lot for your help!!
GMATNinja
Prayag2
I have a doubt:

As the question mentions Unsaleable Garments are 7% of the total production.

The recycled scrap is reported as 9%.

Logically should this considered as 9% of (the 7% Unsaleable Garments); which amount to 0.63%. Thus A will fit more here?
If we go with that interpretation, there would be no discrepancy to explain! And notice that the passage says, "the percentage of garments reported as recycled scrap is 9 percent" and not "the percentage of unsalable garments reported as recycled scrap is 9 percent".

The clothing manufacturer reports three things:

  1. 7 percent of the garments produced are unsalable.
  2. 9 percent of the garments produced are reported as recycled scrap.
  3. ALL unsalable garments are recycled as scrap.

If ALL unsalable garments are recycled as scrap, shouldn't the second figure be 7 percent instead of 9 percent? Why do we have two different numbers if were talking about the same portion of the garments?

Choice (E) provides an explanation:

  • If 7 out of 100 garments are unsalable, that represents 7 percent based on COUNT of garments.
  • Let's say those 100 garments weigh a total of 10,000 grams (100 grams per garment on average). The 7 unsalable garments might weight a total of 900 grams (about 129 grams on average, which is a bit higher than the overall average).
  • So by COUNT, those 7 garments represent 7% of the total. But by WEIGHT those same 7 garments represent 9% of the total.

That explains why there are two different figures: one is based on count and the other is based on weight.

I hope that helps!
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
495 posts
358 posts