Background Information: An unprecedented crisis caused by borrowers defaulting on mortgage loans is affecting the national banking industry.
Premise: Any bank that wants to survive the mortgage crisis must lay off workers.
Premise: Ringotts Bank laid off 10 percent of its workforce last weekConclusion: therefore,
Ringotts Bank will survive the mortgage crisis.The two bolded portions of the argument above play which of the following roles?
The second portion is a conclusion that may or may not be true. We don't know whether laying off 10% of the worker is sufficient to save the bank from the crisis. It may be the case the bank needs to lay off at least 15% of the workers.A.
The first portion is evidence that supports the argument; the second portion is a conclusion that
must be true based on the evidence.
B.
The first portion is evidence that supports the argument; the second portion is a conclusion that is not necessarily true based on the evidence.C.
The first portion is a conclusion that must be true based on the evidence;
the second portion is evidence in support of that conclusion.
D.
The first portion is a conclusion that is not necessarily true based on the evidence;
the second portion is evidence in support of that conclusion.
E.
The first portion is a conclusion that must be true based on the evidence;
the second portion is a conclusion that is not necessarily true based on the evidence.