A recent worldwide decline of ocean fishery stocks has stimulated rapi

Question

A recent worldwide decline of ocean fishery stocks has stimulated rapid growth in cultivated production of fish and shellfish, usually known as fish farming. Between 1987 and 1997, for example, global fish production from farming doubled. Fish farming produces a quarter of all fish and shellfish eaten by humans, and, as global population increases, fish farming will probably become even more important in supplying human protein needs. Some experts even argue that in addition to helping to compensate for the decline in ocean harvests, fish farming will restore wild populations by relieving pressure on ocean fisheries. There is, however, little if any evidence that fish farming will restore ocean fishery stocks. The complexity of production systems leads to an underlying paradox: fish farming is a possible solution, but also a potential contributing factor, to the continued decline of ocean fishery stocks worldwide.

In the first place, the more intensive forms of fish fanning, oriented toward high-volume production, threaten the sustainability of ocean fisheries through water pollution and ecological disruption. Intensive fish farming usually involves the enclosure of fish in a secure system; population densities are typically high, resulting in the generation of large amounts of waste and increased potential for the spread of pathogens. Habitat destruction through the spread of untreated waste, the escape of species not native to the farm's region, or contamination by new pathogens can all ensue, seriously damaging ocean and coastal resources and, ultimately, wild fishery stocks.

Even more important, intensive farming of many species of fish requires large inputs of fish meal and fish oil in order to supply fatty acids that vegetable matter lacks or essential amino acids that it inadequately supplies, like lysine and methionine. For the ten species of fish most commonly farmed, an average of 1.9 kilograms of wild fish is required for every kilogram of fish produced. Of the ten species, only three—catfish, milkfish, and carp—require less fish input than is eventually harvested, while the farming of carnivorous species like salmon has a very high input-to-output ratio. Although some defenders of fish fanning contend that predatory carnivores in the wild consume even more fish than they would on a farm, farming of such carnivorous species requires up to 5 kilograms of wild fish for every kilogram of fish produced.

Expanding farm production does have the potential to alleviate some of the pressure on wild fishery stocks. For example, increasing the farm production of fish like salmon can reduce prices, deterring investment in fishing fleets and, over time, reducing fishing efforts. Similarly, other farmed fish like tilapia and channel catfish provide alternatives to ocean fish like cod and haddock. Nonetheless, even these benefits may in the end be lost because niche markets have started to develop for several species of wild-caught fish, causing their catch rates to remain high even as the production of viable farmed substitutes has increased.    1 
 1. Which one of the following most accurately describes the main point of the passage?

(A) The recent decline of ocean fishery stocks was caused by damage to ocean habitats resulting from fish farming. 
(B) Fish fanning has some potential both for increasing global fish supplies and for threatening those very supplies. 
(C) Fish farming is destined to supply ever-larger percentages of human protein needs. 
(D) The high catch rates for several types of wild-caught fish overshadow the advances made by fish farming. 
(E) Because of their diet, carnivorous fish are more expensive and difficult to farm than noncarnivorous fish.

2 
 2. There is information in the passage sufficient to answer which one of the following questions?

(A) How does the escape of species not native to a farm's region result in habitat destruction? 
(B) What sort of shellfish is most commonly raised on fish farms? 
(C) Approximately how many kilograms of fish, on average, does a wild salmon consume during its lifetime? 
(D) What proportion of the fish and shellfish eaten by humans is produced on fish farms? 
(E) How long does it take for niche markets for wild-caught fish to have an appreciable effect on wild populations?

3 
 3. Which one of the following is closest to the meaning of the phrase "relieving pressure on ocean fisheries" as used in the middle of the first paragraph?

(A) making up for the scarcity of wild-caught fish 
(B) supplementing the incomes of people who make a living from ocean fishing 
(C) causing fewer wild fish to be caught 
(D) reducing the amount of income to be earned from ocean fishing 
(E) reducing overall demand for fish and fish products

4 
 4. The information in the passage most strongly supports which one of the following statements?

(A) Any further decline in ocean fishery stocks would not be caused entirely by human activities. 
(B) The best way to reduce the price of wild-caught fish is to put a farmed variety of the same species on the market. 
(C) If fish fanning does not continue to increase, then it is unlikely that worldwide human protein needs can be met. 
(D) Most consumers do not perceive a difference in taste between wild-caught and farmed varieties of the same species of fish. 
(E) The use of wild fish to meet the nutritional needs of fanned fish could result in the overfishing of worldwide fish stocks.

5 
 5. The views put forward in the passage conform most closely to which one of the following principles governing new methods of food production?

(A) They should be employed only if they do not result in major changes in consumer demand for foods produced using traditional methods. 
(B) They should be employed if they are economically more efficient than existing methods and their use will not result in business failures or loss of jobs. 
(C) They should not be employed if they will ultimately result in a net decrease in food of the type produced. 
(D) They should be employed if they promote diversification in the types of foods available for human consumption and help to bring about environmental improvement. 
(E) They should be employed only if they replace other methods that have undesirable ecological effects.

6 
 6. The statements in the passage provide the most support for the view that the author believes which one of the following?

(A) Most farmed fish are carnivorous. 
(B) Farmed and wild fish consume the same foods. 
(C) Pollution is currently more damaging to wild fish populations than is overfishing. 
(D) Market forces can either encourage or discourage overfishing of ocean fisheries. 
(E) The market for wild-caught fish is likely to remain a small one.

7 
 7. The information in the passage most strongly supports which one of the following statements?

(A) Wild fish require different nutrients than farmed fish do. 
(B) It is more profitable to farm species such as catfish, milkfish, and carp than to farm species such as salmon. 
(C) The farming of tilapia and channel catfish produces as much environmental damage as the farming of cod and haddock. 
(D) A growing number of consumers are choosing wild-caught fish of certain species in preference to fanned fish. 
(E) Noncamivorous fish in the wild typically do not consume more food than their farmed counterparts do.

8 
 8. The author of the passage would be most likely to agree with which one of the following statements regarding pollution caused by fish farmi ng?

(A) Such pollution is problematic primarily because of the genetic mutations it would cause in wild fish that live near fish farms. 
(B) Such pollution contributes to coastal degradation more than any other type of pollution. 
(C) Such pollution is less likely to occur if fish fanning enterprises do not pursue intensive production methods. 
(D) Such pollution cannot be prevented by fish farmers alone without the involvement of government agencies. 
(E) Such pollution is, however harmful, unlikely to prevent fish farming from eventually relieving the pressure on wild fishery stocks.

johnnymbikes · Accepted Answer

Not a difficult / technical science passage but some Qs have trap answers.

Q1: B - Para 1 states the paradox of fish farming

Q2: D - Para 1 states 1/4 of all fish consumed by humans is farmed

Q3: C - Para 4 - sentence after explains about reducing investing in new wild ocean fishing boats & fish farms have potential to supply enough fish and thereby reduce wild fishing

Q4: E - Para 3 - explains that fish like salmon require a large input 5kg for 1kg of output of salmon; so to raise farmed salmon, may have to catch more wild fish to feed the farmed salmon

Q5: C (I got this wrong, I fell for D) - but using inference, Para 1 does mention that it's all about having enough protein to feed growing human population. So food security is key. In D - I misinterpreted "food diversification" to relate to diverse types of farmed fish to consume and there is no mention of other food types beyond fish in the passage.

Q6: D - Para 4 talks about economics - reducing price of farmed fish by increasing supply

Q7: D - Para 4 talks about the market niche of consumers demanding wild caught fish vs. farmed fish; B is the trap answer that even though they shared some data that the ratio of input to output is more favourable for the 3 farmed fish -- remember Sales - Cost = Profit. We are not given any information on the "Sales" variable to support whether these 3 fish types are profitable or not.

Q8:C - Para 2 talks about pollution. Here E is the trap answer - although the author is evaluating the "paradox" from Para 1 - it's not about pollution, also in Para 1 - the author doesn't believe that fish farming will restore fishery stock given "little evidence."

MartyMurray · Answer

5. The views put forward in the passage conform most closely to which one of the following principles governing new methods of food production?

(A) They should be employed only if they do not result in major changes in consumer demand for foods produced using traditional methods.

This choice is incorrect because, if anything, it's basically the opposite of what the passage suggests.

The passage indicates that one of the issues with fish farming is that it does NOT necessarily cause reductions, i.e., changes, in demand for wild-caught fish, i.e. food "produced using traditional methods."

Here's the portion of the passage in the last paragraph that indicates that:

even these benefits may in the end be lost because niche markets have started to develop for several species of wild-caught fish, causing their catch rates to remain high even as the production of viable farmed substitutes has increased

Eliminate.

(B) They should be employed if they are economically more efficient than existing methods and their use will not result in business failures or loss of jobs.

The passage does not advocate for "economically more efficient" methods of food production.

Also, "They should be employed if ... their use will not result in business failures or loss of jobs," conflicts with what the passage says in that the passage suggests that "reducing fishing efforts," in other words, a decline in fishing business, would be beneficial.

Eliminate.

(C) They should not be employed if they will ultimately result in a net decrease in food of the type produced.

This choice may not perfectly match the passage, but it works pretty well.

The passage says the following:

fish farming is a possible solution, but also a potential contributing factor, to the continued decline of ocean fishery stocks worldwide

Habitat destruction through the spread of untreated waste, the escape of species not native to the farm's region, or contamination by new pathogens can all ensue, seriously damaging ... wild fishery stocks.

Although some defenders of fish fanning contend that predatory carnivores in the wild consume even more fish than they would on a farm, farming of such carnivorous species requires up to 5 kilograms of wild fish for every kilogram of fish produced.

Those statements, along with others in the passage, make sense in the context of the principle that, if fish farming causes "decline of ocean fishery stocks," then fish farming should not be engaged in. In other words, the author's discussion assumes that principle as a given.

That principle is a specific example of the more general principle "new methods of food production" "should not be employed if they will ultimately result in a net decrease in food of the type produced."

Keep.

(D) They should be employed if they promote diversification in the types of foods available for human consumption and help to bring about environmental improvement.

This choice is tempting because it has the vibe of fitting what the passage says since the passage is about "foods available for human consumption" and since it mentions environmental effects of fish farms.

However, this choice is incorrect because the passage does not advocate for use of methods that "promote diversification in the types of foods available." Rather, it says that fish farms may be beneficial if they "alleviate some of the pressure on wild fishery stocks."

Also, regarding "environmental" effects, the passage mentions only the negative environmental effects of fish farming such as "habitat destruction," the benefits it focuses on once again being related to restoring "fishery stocks," rather than related to the environment in general.

Eliminate.

(E) They should be employed only if they replace other methods that have undesirable ecological effects.

This choice is tempting because the passage does indicate that replacing fishing for wild fish with fish farming could result in a reduction in some "undesirable" effects.

However, the passage does not ever suggest that methods should be used "only if" they replace methods that have undesirable ecological effects.

There's a difference between suggesting that some methods are ecologically better than others and suggesting that methods should be used only if they "replace" methods that have undesirable ecological effects.

In other words, the passage never suggests that methods should not be used if they don't replace methods that have undesirable ecological effects.

Eliminate.

The correct answer is (C).

Sajjad1994 · Answer

Explanation

2. There is information in the passage sufficient to answer which one of the following questions?

Explanation

In the passage, it is explicitly stated that fish farming produces a quarter of all fish and shellfish eaten by humans. This information directly addresses the question, providing the proportion of human consumption that comes from fish farming.

A.  The passage discusses how the escape of non-native species from fish farms can result in habitat destruction but does not provide specific details about how this relates to the quantity of fish and shellfish consumed by humans.

B.  The passage mentions fish farming as a whole but does not specifically discuss which type of shellfish is most commonly raised on fish farms.

C.  Although the passage discusses the input-to-output ratio for farming various species of fish, it does not provide specific information about the consumption of wild salmon during its lifetime.

D.   The passage explicitly states that fish farming produces a quarter of all fish and shellfish eaten by humans, providing the proportion of human consumption that comes from fish farms.

E.  The passage discusses how niche markets for wild-caught fish can affect wild populations but does not specify the timeframe for this effect to become appreciable.

Answer: D

agrasan · Answer

Hi experts  KarishmaB   GMATNinja   DmitryFarber   MartyMurray

In  question-7 , could you please explain why option B is wrong?

7. The information in the passage most strongly supports which one of the following statements?
(B) It is more profitable to farm species such as catfish, milkfish, and carp than to farm species such as salmon.

If we look at the passage, we can infer on profitability from following lines:   Of the ten species, only three—catfish, milkfish, and carp—require less fish input than is eventually harvested, while the farming of carnivorous species like salmon has a very high  input-to-output ratio .

My reasoning is higher input-to-output ratio means more expenses than revenues, this implies that farming of carnivorous species is less profitable affair  per fish . 
   Is option B wrong we don't know the sale base for carnivorous fishes as compared to other three?

Please let me know where I am going wrong on option B.

DmitryFarberMPrep · Answer

The problem with that reasoning is that we don't know the COSTS of the inputs vs. the outputs. We just know the weights. For instance, if you can buy 100 lbs. of feed fish for $100, but then use that to produce 50 lbs of fish that sell for $6/pound, you might come out with a solid profit. Also, we don't know the other costs involved in fish farming. For all we know, feed is only a small % of the cost and doesn't do much to tell us which species is most profitable to farm. Meanwhile, is anyone else wondering why this passage goes back and forth between saying "farming" and "fanning"? What on earth is fanning?

A recent worldwide decline of ocean fishery stocks has stimulated rapi

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Reading Comprehension (RC) Questions

A recent worldwide decline of ocean fishery stocks has stimulated rapi

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards