Last visit was: 24 Apr 2026, 08:32 It is currently 24 Apr 2026, 08:32
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,814
Own Kudos:
811,022
 [1]
Given Kudos: 105,871
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,814
Kudos: 811,022
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
pudu
Joined: 12 Mar 2023
Last visit: 06 Mar 2024
Posts: 229
Own Kudos:
123
 [1]
Given Kudos: 16
Location: India
Posts: 229
Kudos: 123
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sood1596
Joined: 15 Apr 2020
Last visit: 17 Jul 2024
Posts: 209
Own Kudos:
173
 [2]
Given Kudos: 96
Location: United Arab Emirates
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
WE:Analyst (Consulting)
Products:
Posts: 209
Kudos: 173
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
DrAnkita91
Joined: 29 Aug 2022
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 58
Own Kudos:
21
 [1]
Given Kudos: 93
Posts: 58
Kudos: 21
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The officials objection is because of the high cost. Only option c and option e are talking about the cost. Here option e is strengthner of the objection and option c is the weakness. so option c is the answer
User avatar
KD_Mumbai
Joined: 29 Aug 2023
Last visit: 04 Dec 2023
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
6
 [1]
Given Kudos: 10
Location: India
GPA: 4
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Doubt on Answer C.

We don't know what is the amount of one-third cost of the total budget. What if underground wiring costs are 100 times that?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,814
Own Kudos:
811,022
 [1]
Given Kudos: 105,871
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,814
Kudos: 811,022
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
The spokesman for the Ministry of Transport announced that the ministry has decided to pave roads with underground wiring as an alternative to spreading salt on the ice- and snow-covered roads. However, an official in the Ministry, who opposes the Ministry’s decision, was quoted saying that due to the high initial costs, the project cannot be cost-effective .

Which of the following, if true, most weakens the official's objection to the Ministry’s decision?


(A) Wiring roads has proved to be an effective means of preventing the accumulation of snow.

(B) Recent surveys indicate that ice-covered roads are the number one cause of car accidents in the winter.

(C) Last year, the Ministry of Transport spent a third of its budget on winter road maintenance in fuel, salt and personnel.

(D) Several countries, which have already wired their roads, still use salt as an additional measure.

(E) The price of electricity, on which the underground wiring system runs, has been increasing steadily over the past ten years.




OFFICIAL EXPLANATION



The spokesman for the Ministry of Transport announced that the ministry has decided to pave roads with underground wiring as an alternative to spreading salt on the ice- and snow-covered roads. However, an official in the Ministry, who opposes the Ministry’s decision, was quoted saying that due to the high initial costs, the project cannot be cost-effective .

Which of the following, if true, most weakens the official's objection to the Ministry’s decision?



(A) Wiring roads has proved to be an effective means of preventing the accumulation of snow.

Incorrect.

To solve this Conclusion Weakening question, first break down the argument. The first sentence quotes a decision, presenting the Ministry of Transport's position. The next sentence has a reason conjunction (due to) which is followed by the premise (high costs) and then the official's conclusion.

    The Ministry's Decision: build roads with underground wiring instead of using salt to clear roads
    +
    Premise A: there are high-initial costs
    =
    Official's Conclusion: this project is not cost-effective, i.e., wasteful

    Possible assumption: nothing is saved by moving to roads with underground wiring

    Weakening Data: ?


You are required to find data that weakens the official's view that the project is wasteful or supports the Ministry's decision. The correct answer could be one that exposes the argument's assumption.

This answer choice neither weakens nor strengthens the official's position as it does not discuss the cost of the project and its effectiveness in relation to that cost. The underground wiring system may be effective but if it costs too much it's not cost-effective.



(B) Recent surveys indicate that ice-covered roads are the number one cause of car accidents in the winter.

Incorrect.

This answer choice neither weakens nor strengthens the official's position as it does not discuss the cost of the project, only its importance. According to this, either underground wiring in roads or spreading salt would do, as long as the roads are clear of ice.



(C) Last year, the Ministry of Transport spent a third of its budget on winter road maintenance in fuel, salt and personnel.

This answer choice attacks the argument's assumption by showing that a third of the Ministry budget can be saved if the underground wiring is installed in roads. By doing so, the new system isn't just a waste of money - it also saves a fortune spent on road maintenance, a fact which weakens the officials objection.


(D) Several countries, which have already wired their roads, still use salt as an additional measure.

Incorrect.

To solve this Conclusion Weakening question, first break down the argument. The first sentence quotes a decision, presenting the Ministry of Transport's position. The next sentence has a reason conjunction (due to) which is followed by the premise (high costs) and then the official's conclusion.

    The Ministry's Decision: build roads with underground wiring instead of using salt to clear roads
    +
    Premise A: there are high-initial costs
    =
    Official's Conclusion: this project is not cost-effective, i.e., wasteful

    Possible assumption: nothing is saved by moving to roads with underground wiring

    Weakening Data: ?


You are required to find data that weakens the official's view that the project is wasteful or supports the Ministry's decision. The correct answer could be one that exposes the argument's assumption.

This answer choice supports the official's view by confirming the assumption that the underground wiring system does not save in expenses. If the roads still need salt to be cleared of ice, the underground wiring system is indeed wasteful. However, you were required to weaken the official's view rather than strengthen it.



(E) The price of electricity, on which the underground wiring system runs, has been increasing steadily over the past ten years.

Incorrect.

This answer choice actually strengthens the official as it states that the price of electricity is rising. This makes the option of wiring roads more expensive. However, you were meant to weaken the official's objection by showing that the wiring system is not as wasteful as the official claims it to be.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
501 posts
358 posts