Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
02 Jan 2024, 04:56
Kudos
Bookmarks
Agricultural Expert: A report claims that the widespread use of chemical fertilizers in Grainland has led to a decrease in soil quality, citing a study that found lower levels of essential nutrients in the soil. However, this claim overlooks key factors. First, Grainland has seen a significant increase in organic farming, which does not use chemical fertilizers. Second, recent advancements in farming techniques have led to more efficient nutrient usage by crops. Furthermore, the same period saw an increase in crop yield per hectare, suggesting an improvement in overall soil fertility.
Which of the following best describes how the expert counters the report’s argument?
A. proposing alternative factors that might have led to the observed decrease in soil nutrients.
B. suggesting that the soil study used in assessing soil quality is flawed.
C. arguing that the increase in crop yield is a more reliable indicator of soil quality than nutrient levels.
D. highlighting advancements in farming techniques that contradict the report's claim about soil quality.
E. asserting that the rise in crop yields proves that the report’s conclusion about the impact of chemical fertilizers on soil quality is false.
Which of the following best describes how the expert counters the report’s argument?
A. proposing alternative factors that might have led to the observed decrease in soil nutrients.
B. suggesting that the soil study used in assessing soil quality is flawed.
C. arguing that the increase in crop yield is a more reliable indicator of soil quality than nutrient levels.
D. highlighting advancements in farming techniques that contradict the report's claim about soil quality.
E. asserting that the rise in crop yields proves that the report’s conclusion about the impact of chemical fertilizers on soil quality is false.
06 Apr 2024, 03:30
Kudos
Bookmarks
Bunuel
Report:
Premise: a study has found lower levels of essential nutrients in the soil.
Conclusion: the widespread use of chemical fertilizers in Grainland has led to a decrease in soil quality.
Expert:
Premises:
Grainland has seen a significant increase in organic farming, which does not use chemical fertilizers.
Recent advancements in farming techniques have led to more efficient nutrient usage by crops.
The same period saw an increase in crop yield per hectare, suggesting an improvement in overall soil fertility.
Conclusion: Report's conclusion (about fertilizers being responsible for decrease in soil quality) overlooks key factors.
The expert attempts to counter the report's argument by ....
The expert says that the conclusion has overlooked some key factors i.e. it has not evaluated all the factors that could play a role in the situation as it is. What are those factors?
- Organic farming (with no use of chemical fertilizers) has increased hence crops are using the nutrients of the soil.
- New farming tech allows crops to use soil's nutrient's more efficiently i.e. perhaps the crops are able to better absorb soil's nutrients.
- Productivity has increased in this period so that suggests that soil fertility has actually improved.
Look at the options now:
A. proposing alternative factors that might have led to the observed decrease in soil nutrients.
Correct. He does propose two alternative factors that might have led to the observed decrease in soil nutrients.
B. suggesting that the report's methodology in assessing soil quality is flawed.
The author does not suggest that the study (which found lower level of nutrients) is flawed. That was the report's method of assessing soil quality.
C. arguing that the increase in crop yield is a more reliable indicator of soil quality than nutrient levels.
He does not make a comparison - that this is more reliable than that. He says that this point has been overlooked (key factors overlooked)
D. highlighting advancements in farming techniques that contradict the report's claim about soil quality.
He is not contradicting the claims of the report. He says that some more factors need to be evaluated.
E. presenting a trend that directly opposes the report's conclusion about the impact of chemical fertilizers on soil quality.
He does not present any trend that opposes the report's conclusion about the impact of chemical fertilizer on soil quality. He does not say that chemical fertilizers actually improve soil quality etc. He does present a point that could make us question whether soil quality has degraded or not but he does not present any point (and certainly no trend which lasts much longer) about the impact of chemical fertilizer on soil quality.
Hence this is not correct.
Answer (A)
General Discussion
02 Jan 2024, 04:56
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Solution:
Agricultural Expert: A report claims that the widespread use of chemical fertilizers in Grainland has led to a decrease in soil quality, citing a study that found lower levels of essential nutrients in the soil. However, this claim overlooks key factors. First, Grainland has seen a significant increase in organic farming, which does not use chemical fertilizers. Second, recent advancements in farming techniques have led to more efficient nutrient usage by crops. Furthermore, the same period saw an increase in crop yield per hectare, suggesting an improvement in overall soil fertility.
Which of the following best describes how the expert counters the report’s argument?
A. proposing alternative factors that might have led to the observed decrease in soil nutrients.
B. suggesting that the soil study used in assessing soil quality is flawed.
C. arguing that the increase in crop yield is a more reliable indicator of soil quality than nutrient levels.
D. highlighting advancements in farming techniques that contradict the report's claim about soil quality.
E. asserting that the rise in crop yields proves that the report’s conclusion about the impact of chemical fertilizers on soil quality is false.
In the passage, the agricultural expert challenges the claim that the widespread use of chemical fertilizers in Grainland has led to a decrease in soil quality. The expert does this by introducing alternative explanations for the observed decrease in soil nutrients:
1. The increase in organic farming in Grainland, which does not use chemical fertilizers, could contribute to changes in soil nutrient levels.
2. Recent advancements in farming techniques leading to more efficient nutrient usage by crops, which could affect the levels of nutrients found in the soil.
These points offer alternative reasons for the decrease in soil nutrients, other than the use of chemical fertilizers. This approach is characteristic of (A), which involves proposing other factors that might have led to the observed phenomenon, in this case, the decrease in soil nutrients.
The other options are not supported by the passage:
• (B) is incorrect because the expert does not critique the methodology of the report's study.
• (C) is incorrect as the expert does not argue that crop yield is a more reliable indicator of soil quality than nutrient levels, but merely mentions the increase in crop yield as part of their argument.
• (D) is incorrect because, although the expert mentions advancements in farming techniques, they do not use this to directly contradict the report’s claim about soil quality.
• (E) is incorrect because it overclaims proof from yield trends and misstates the method. The expert offers alternative explanations rather than conclusively disproving the report.
Given these analyses, (A) is the most accurate representation of how the agricultural expert counters the report's argument. The expert introduces alternative explanations for the observed decrease in soil nutrients, challenging the direct link made by the report between chemical fertilizer use and decreased soil quality.
Answer: A
Agricultural Expert: A report claims that the widespread use of chemical fertilizers in Grainland has led to a decrease in soil quality, citing a study that found lower levels of essential nutrients in the soil. However, this claim overlooks key factors. First, Grainland has seen a significant increase in organic farming, which does not use chemical fertilizers. Second, recent advancements in farming techniques have led to more efficient nutrient usage by crops. Furthermore, the same period saw an increase in crop yield per hectare, suggesting an improvement in overall soil fertility.
Which of the following best describes how the expert counters the report’s argument?
A. proposing alternative factors that might have led to the observed decrease in soil nutrients.
B. suggesting that the soil study used in assessing soil quality is flawed.
C. arguing that the increase in crop yield is a more reliable indicator of soil quality than nutrient levels.
D. highlighting advancements in farming techniques that contradict the report's claim about soil quality.
E. asserting that the rise in crop yields proves that the report’s conclusion about the impact of chemical fertilizers on soil quality is false.
In the passage, the agricultural expert challenges the claim that the widespread use of chemical fertilizers in Grainland has led to a decrease in soil quality. The expert does this by introducing alternative explanations for the observed decrease in soil nutrients:
1. The increase in organic farming in Grainland, which does not use chemical fertilizers, could contribute to changes in soil nutrient levels.
2. Recent advancements in farming techniques leading to more efficient nutrient usage by crops, which could affect the levels of nutrients found in the soil.
These points offer alternative reasons for the decrease in soil nutrients, other than the use of chemical fertilizers. This approach is characteristic of (A), which involves proposing other factors that might have led to the observed phenomenon, in this case, the decrease in soil nutrients.
The other options are not supported by the passage:
• (B) is incorrect because the expert does not critique the methodology of the report's study.
• (C) is incorrect as the expert does not argue that crop yield is a more reliable indicator of soil quality than nutrient levels, but merely mentions the increase in crop yield as part of their argument.
• (D) is incorrect because, although the expert mentions advancements in farming techniques, they do not use this to directly contradict the report’s claim about soil quality.
• (E) is incorrect because it overclaims proof from yield trends and misstates the method. The expert offers alternative explanations rather than conclusively disproving the report.
Given these analyses, (A) is the most accurate representation of how the agricultural expert counters the report's argument. The expert introduces alternative explanations for the observed decrease in soil nutrients, challenging the direct link made by the report between chemical fertilizer use and decreased soil quality.
Answer: A
