Last visit was: 02 Sep 2026, 23:03 It is currently 02 Sep 2026, 23:03
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Swagatalaxmi
Joined: 05 Sep 2023
Last visit: 09 Jul 2026
Posts: 132
Own Kudos:
1,185
 [45]
Given Kudos: 329
Location: India
Concentration: Healthcare, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q85 V88 DI80
GPA: 3.19
WE:Medicine and Health (Healthcare/Pharmaceuticals)
Products:
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
40
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
MoPouyan
Joined: 23 Mar 2021
Last visit: 07 Feb 2025
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
12
 [7]
Given Kudos: 198
Posts: 16
Kudos: 12
 [7]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
callingTardis
Joined: 09 Nov 2019
Last visit: 21 Nov 2025
Posts: 26
Own Kudos:
61
 [1]
Given Kudos: 176
Posts: 26
Kudos: 61
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Hitesh0701
Joined: 24 Jan 2023
Last visit: 26 Aug 2025
Posts: 33
Own Kudos:
33
 [2]
Given Kudos: 5
Location: India
Posts: 33
Kudos: 33
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Here are my two cents:
The level of unemployment benefits has a greater impact on the percentage of employed workers age 55-59 than on the percentage of employed workers age 30-49.

Answer: From the graph, we can see that when black arrow (which shows b high and r high) is passing through the age group, employment is declined because unemployment benefits (b high) are high and when that same arrow is within the age group 30-49, employment rate is on a higher side. Hence, unemployment benefits play a role for the age group 55-59.


Let me know if it's not clear.
User avatar
Julioo
Joined: 19 Nov 2019
Last visit: 13 Jul 2026
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 503
Posts: 7
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
On the statement “The incentive scheme has the greatest effect on the employment rates of those workers who are within 5 years of the retirement age.” Can someone please explain to me what exactly "within" means and why? To what range does that translate into and why? Thanks a lot!!!
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 113,073
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 111,296
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 113,073
Kudos: 838,739
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Julioo
On the statement “The incentive scheme has the greatest effect on the employment rates of those workers who are within 5 years of the retirement age.” Can someone please explain to me what exactly "within" means and why? To what range does that translate into and why? Thanks a lot!!!
The incentive scheme has the greatest effect on the employment rates of those workers who are within 5 years of the retirement age.


Retirement age is 60. Workers within 5 years of age 60 are the 55 to 59 group and the 60 to 64 group.

From the table:
55 to 59 rises from 57.9% to 71.4%, so +13.5.
60 to 64 rises from 0.0% to 20.1%, so +20.1.

These are the two biggest changes in the table.

Answer: Consistent.
User avatar
msc12345
Joined: 18 Aug 2021
Last visit: 26 Aug 2026
Posts: 11
Given Kudos: 23
Posts: 11
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The distance effect is greater when the level of unemployment benefits is low.

as the unemployment benefits is low, meaning the incentive will not be given or given but value is low, hence less people will be encouraged to take up jobs in retirement age (55–59 and 60–64) hence distance will grow..... where am i wrong?

MoPouyan
Q1-

1-The employment rate for workers age 60–64 was higher after the incentive scheme was implemented. (Yes)
Explanation: From the table, the employment rate for the 60–64 age group increased from 0.0% to 20.1% after the incentive scheme was introduced. This clearly shows that the employment rate for this age group was higher post-implementation, so the answer is Yes.

2-The employment rate for workers age 50–54 was higher after the incentive scheme was implemented. (No)
Explanation: The table shows that the employment rate for the 50–54 age group increased slightly from 80.0% to 81.2% after the incentive scheme. While there was an increase, this may not be directly attributed to the scheme itself since the increase is minimal, and the graph and passage don’t indicate that the scheme primarily targeted this age group. Thus, the correct answer is No.

3-The distance effect was no longer evident. (No)
Explanation: The distance effect refers to the observation that workers closest to retirement age (55–59 and 60–64) are least likely to be employed. Even though the incentive scheme increased employment rates for older workers, the 55–59 group still had lower employment rates compared to younger groups (e.g., 50–54). Additionally, the 60–64 age group still had the lowest employment rate overall (20.1%). Hence, the distance effect remains evident, and the correct answer is No.

Q2-

1-The incentive scheme has the greatest effect on the employment rates of those workers who are within 5 years of the retirement age. (Consistent)
Explanation: According to the table, the employment rate for workers aged 55–59 increased significantly from 57.9% to 71.4%, and for workers aged 60–64, it rose from 0.0% to 20.1%. These age groups are within 5 years of the previous mandatory retirement age of 60, showing that the incentive scheme had its most significant effect on their employment rates. Thus, this statement is consistent with the information.

2-The level of unemployment benefits has a greater impact on the percentage of employed workers age 55–59 than on the percentage of employed workers age 30–49. (Consistent)
Explanation: From the graph, the employment rate for the 55–59 age group is much more sensitive to changes in unemployment benefits compared to the 30–49 age group. For the 55–59 group, provinces with low unemployment benefits and low separation rates show much higher employment levels compared to those with high unemployment benefits and high separation rates. In contrast, the 30–49 age group shows little variation across different benefit levels. This supports the statement as consistent.

3-The distance effect is greater when the level of unemployment benefits is low. (Inconsistent)
Explanation: The distance effect refers to lower employment rates for workers closer to retirement age. However, the graph shows that in provinces with low unemployment benefits, the employment rate for the 55–59 age group is relatively higher compared to provinces with high unemployment benefits. This indicates that the distance effect is less pronounced, not greater, when unemployment benefits are low. Hence, this statement is inconsistent with the information.

Q3-

Explanation: The third paragraph of the passage discusses the introduction of an incentive scheme in Nation X and its positive effects, including increased employment rates for older workers. The table clearly shows that after implementing the scheme, employment rates for the 55–59 and 60–64 age groups significantly increased. This confirms a positive effect directly related to the scheme, making this the correct answer.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 113,073
Own Kudos:
838,739
 [1]
Given Kudos: 111,296
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 113,073
Kudos: 838,739
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
msc12345
The distance effect is greater when the level of unemployment benefits is low.

as the unemployment benefits is low, meaning the incentive will not be given or given but value is low, hence less people will be encouraged to take up jobs in retirement age (55–59 and 60–64) hence distance will grow..... where am i wrong?




Question 3/Statement 3 asks whether the distance effect is stronger when unemployment benefits are low.

The distance effect means that as workers get closer to the retirement age of 60, they become less likely to be employed. So, to see where the distance effect is greater, look at how much the employment rate falls from ages 30-49 to ages 55-59.

From the graph:
  • When unemployment benefits are low (b low, upper two lines), employment rates remain fairly stable as workers approach retirement.
  • When unemployment benefits are high (b high, lower two lines. Ignore nationwide), employment rates fall much more sharply as workers approach retirement. This is true for both high and low separation rates.

Therefore, the distance effect is actually greater when unemployment benefits are high, not low.

Answer: Inconsistent.
Moderators:
Math Expert
113073 posts
DI Forum Moderator
409 posts