Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
12 Aug 2024, 08:57
Kudos
Bookmarks
An economist asserts that a free trade agreement will benefit Country A's automobile industry as long as the industry remains competitive globally; that the industry will remain competitive as long as it continues to innovate; and that it will continue to innovate as long as it receives sufficient investment.
If the assertions above are correct, which of the following further predictions can logically be derived from them?
A. If the automobile industry in Country A does not receive sufficient investment, it will not continue to innovate.
B. If the automobile industry in Country A continues to innovate, it will benefit from the free trade agreement.
C. If there is a global recession, the automobile industry in Country A will cease to innovate.
D. The automobile industry in Country A will receive sufficient investment indefinitely.
E. Country A's economy will become the most dominant in the automobile sector globally.
If the assertions above are correct, which of the following further predictions can logically be derived from them?
A. If the automobile industry in Country A does not receive sufficient investment, it will not continue to innovate.
B. If the automobile industry in Country A continues to innovate, it will benefit from the free trade agreement.
C. If there is a global recession, the automobile industry in Country A will cease to innovate.
D. The automobile industry in Country A will receive sufficient investment indefinitely.
E. Country A's economy will become the most dominant in the automobile sector globally.
12 Aug 2024, 08:57
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Solution:
An economist asserts that a free trade agreement will benefit Country A's automobile industry as long as the industry remains competitive globally; that the industry will remain competitive as long as it continues to innovate; and that it will continue to innovate as long as it receives sufficient investment.
If the assertions above are correct, which of the following further predictions can logically be derived from them?
A. If the automobile industry in Country A does not receive sufficient investment, it will not continue to innovate.
B. If the automobile industry in Country A continues to innovate, it will benefit from the free trade agreement.
C. If there is a global recession, the automobile industry in Country A will cease to innovate.
D. The automobile industry in Country A will receive sufficient investment indefinitely.
E. Country A's economy will become the most dominant in the automobile sector globally.
Correct Answer: B. If the automobile industry in Country A continues to innovate, it will benefit from the free trade agreement.
(B) Correctly connects the conditions laid out: innovation leads to competitiveness, and competitiveness under a free trade agreement leads to benefits. Hence, if innovation continues, then the benefits from the free trade agreement will follow because competitiveness is maintained as a result of innovation.
(A) If the automobile industry in Country A does not receive sufficient investment, it will not continue to innovate.
(A) We only know that sufficient investment guarantees innovation but we don't know if insufficient investment guarantees no innovation. We cannot assume that they are mutually exclusive. Even without continuous investment some innovation may take place, perhaps at a smaller scale. However, based on the argument, we only know that innovation will be guaranteed as long as the auto industry receives sufficient investment. Eliminate.
Additional comments on A): We only know that if a condition is met, a positive result is guaranteed.
Thus the proper logical application would be to say that if the condition is NOT met, then a positive result is NOT guaranteed.
Which is different from "A" which says that if the condition is NOT met, the result is GUARANTEED to be negative.
Illustration of the Application: if you take care of your garden, you will have beautiful flowers. But we can't quite translate it to say that if you don't take care of your garden, you will certainly NOT have beautiful flowers. You still may, perhaps it is an unlikely outcome, but it is guaranteed to not happen, it is just not guaranteed to happen. Another take would be - You are not guaranteed to fail, just not guaranteed to succeed. Hope it helps.
(C) If there is a global recession, the automobile industry in Country A will cease to innovate.
(C) introduces an external factor (global recession) that is not covered by the economist’s assertions. There is no direct connection between a recession and innovation. Perhaps during the recession there will be less investment but maybe there will be even more - we do not know and we cannot assume anything else. This statement is insufficient by itself and irrelevant. Eliminate.
(D) The automobile industry in Country A will receive sufficient investment indefinitely.
This answer choice makes a prediction that is not based on any of the stated facts. We do not know or have any reason to believe that investments will continue in the future. Eliminate
(E) Country A's economy will become the most dominant in the automobile sector globally.
This choice goes way beyond the provided facts. There are many conditions that have to happen for this to be true and we do not have any evidence that it will indeed happen. Eliminate
Answer: B
An economist asserts that a free trade agreement will benefit Country A's automobile industry as long as the industry remains competitive globally; that the industry will remain competitive as long as it continues to innovate; and that it will continue to innovate as long as it receives sufficient investment.
If the assertions above are correct, which of the following further predictions can logically be derived from them?
A. If the automobile industry in Country A does not receive sufficient investment, it will not continue to innovate.
B. If the automobile industry in Country A continues to innovate, it will benefit from the free trade agreement.
C. If there is a global recession, the automobile industry in Country A will cease to innovate.
D. The automobile industry in Country A will receive sufficient investment indefinitely.
E. Country A's economy will become the most dominant in the automobile sector globally.
Correct Answer: B. If the automobile industry in Country A continues to innovate, it will benefit from the free trade agreement.
(B) Correctly connects the conditions laid out: innovation leads to competitiveness, and competitiveness under a free trade agreement leads to benefits. Hence, if innovation continues, then the benefits from the free trade agreement will follow because competitiveness is maintained as a result of innovation.
(A) If the automobile industry in Country A does not receive sufficient investment, it will not continue to innovate.
(A) We only know that sufficient investment guarantees innovation but we don't know if insufficient investment guarantees no innovation. We cannot assume that they are mutually exclusive. Even without continuous investment some innovation may take place, perhaps at a smaller scale. However, based on the argument, we only know that innovation will be guaranteed as long as the auto industry receives sufficient investment. Eliminate.
Additional comments on A): We only know that if a condition is met, a positive result is guaranteed.
Thus the proper logical application would be to say that if the condition is NOT met, then a positive result is NOT guaranteed.
Which is different from "A" which says that if the condition is NOT met, the result is GUARANTEED to be negative.
Illustration of the Application: if you take care of your garden, you will have beautiful flowers. But we can't quite translate it to say that if you don't take care of your garden, you will certainly NOT have beautiful flowers. You still may, perhaps it is an unlikely outcome, but it is guaranteed to not happen, it is just not guaranteed to happen. Another take would be - You are not guaranteed to fail, just not guaranteed to succeed. Hope it helps.
(C) If there is a global recession, the automobile industry in Country A will cease to innovate.
(C) introduces an external factor (global recession) that is not covered by the economist’s assertions. There is no direct connection between a recession and innovation. Perhaps during the recession there will be less investment but maybe there will be even more - we do not know and we cannot assume anything else. This statement is insufficient by itself and irrelevant. Eliminate.
(D) The automobile industry in Country A will receive sufficient investment indefinitely.
This answer choice makes a prediction that is not based on any of the stated facts. We do not know or have any reason to believe that investments will continue in the future. Eliminate
(E) Country A's economy will become the most dominant in the automobile sector globally.
This choice goes way beyond the provided facts. There are many conditions that have to happen for this to be true and we do not have any evidence that it will indeed happen. Eliminate
Answer: B
Shlokzanwar
Joined: 21 Jul 2024
Last visit: 14 May 2025
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Location: India
Schools: Stanford (S)
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V81 DI85 
GMAT Focus 2: 755 Q90 V88 DI84
GPA: 8.55
24 Nov 2024, 08:53
Kudos
Bookmarks
Answer should be A
The argument establishes a conditional chain of reasoning:
Sufficient investment → Innovation
Innovation → Competitiveness
Competitiveness → Benefit from the free trade agreement
From the first conditional statement (sufficient investment → innovation), we can infer its contrapositive: no sufficient investment → no innovation. This logical inference directly supports answer A.
Why not the other options?
B: The assertions do not establish that continuing to innovate is sufficient to ensure the benefit of the free trade agreement; competitiveness is also required.
C: A global recession is not mentioned in the premises, so this prediction cannot logically be derived.
D: The premises do not guarantee that the industry will receive sufficient investment indefinitely; they only establish the importance of investment for innovation.
E: There is no evidence in the argument to suggest that Country A’s economy will dominate globally in the automobile sector.
bb if you could please help out here
The argument establishes a conditional chain of reasoning:
Sufficient investment → Innovation
Innovation → Competitiveness
Competitiveness → Benefit from the free trade agreement
From the first conditional statement (sufficient investment → innovation), we can infer its contrapositive: no sufficient investment → no innovation. This logical inference directly supports answer A.
Why not the other options?
B: The assertions do not establish that continuing to innovate is sufficient to ensure the benefit of the free trade agreement; competitiveness is also required.
C: A global recession is not mentioned in the premises, so this prediction cannot logically be derived.
D: The premises do not guarantee that the industry will receive sufficient investment indefinitely; they only establish the importance of investment for innovation.
E: There is no evidence in the argument to suggest that Country A’s economy will dominate globally in the automobile sector.
bb if you could please help out here
