Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
14 Sep 2024, 21:55
Kudos
Bookmarks
A price ceiling is a government or group-imposed limit on how high a price may be charged for a product, commodity, or service. Governments typically impose price ceilings when high inflation, an investment bubble, or monopoly control threatens to make essential goods prohibitively expensive. Such conditions can occur during periods of high inflation, in the event of an investment bubble, or in the case of monopoly ownership of a product.
There is substantial research showing that under certain circumstances, price ceilings can, paradoxically, lead to higher prices. The leading explanation is that price ceilings can coordinate collusion among suppliers who would otherwise compete on price. More precisely, forming a cartel becomes profitable by enabling nominally competing firms to act like a monopoly, limiting quantities and raising prices.
However, forming a cartel is difficult because firms need to agree on quantities and prices, and each firm has an incentive to "cheat" by lowering prices to sell more than it agreed to. A third party, such as a regulator, announcing and enforcing a maximum price level can make it easier for firms to agree on a price and monitor pricing. The regulatory price can be viewed as a focal point that is natural for all parties in the cartel to charge.
Rent controls are a form of price ceiling. These were instituted in the U.S. in the 1940s by President Franklin D. Roosevelt and his newly-formed Office of Price Administration. The Office instituted price ceilings on a wide range of commodities, including rent controls that allowed returning World War II veterans and their families to afford housing.
As predicted by economic models, this policy lowered the supply of rentable properties available to veterans. At the same time, there was an increase in homeownership and the number of homes for sale. This outcome could be explained by landowners converting their rentable properties to sellable ones, due to the financial unviability of the rental market and the lack of incentive for landowners to destroy or leave their properties vacant.
According to the passage, governments are most likely to impose a price ceiling under which of the following conditions?
A. Producers cut prices in an attempt to capture market share.
B. In the presence of high inflation, essential goods have become unaffordable.
C. Market regulators remove controls in a competitive industry.
D. A single firm controls production, but market prices remain stable.
E. Demand for luxury goods declines sharply.
There is substantial research showing that under certain circumstances, price ceilings can, paradoxically, lead to higher prices. The leading explanation is that price ceilings can coordinate collusion among suppliers who would otherwise compete on price. More precisely, forming a cartel becomes profitable by enabling nominally competing firms to act like a monopoly, limiting quantities and raising prices.
However, forming a cartel is difficult because firms need to agree on quantities and prices, and each firm has an incentive to "cheat" by lowering prices to sell more than it agreed to. A third party, such as a regulator, announcing and enforcing a maximum price level can make it easier for firms to agree on a price and monitor pricing. The regulatory price can be viewed as a focal point that is natural for all parties in the cartel to charge.
Rent controls are a form of price ceiling. These were instituted in the U.S. in the 1940s by President Franklin D. Roosevelt and his newly-formed Office of Price Administration. The Office instituted price ceilings on a wide range of commodities, including rent controls that allowed returning World War II veterans and their families to afford housing.
As predicted by economic models, this policy lowered the supply of rentable properties available to veterans. At the same time, there was an increase in homeownership and the number of homes for sale. This outcome could be explained by landowners converting their rentable properties to sellable ones, due to the financial unviability of the rental market and the lack of incentive for landowners to destroy or leave their properties vacant.
According to the passage, governments are most likely to impose a price ceiling under which of the following conditions?
A. Producers cut prices in an attempt to capture market share.
B. In the presence of high inflation, essential goods have become unaffordable.
C. Market regulators remove controls in a competitive industry.
D. A single firm controls production, but market prices remain stable.
E. Demand for luxury goods declines sharply.
14 Sep 2024, 21:55
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Solution:
A price ceiling is a government or group-imposed limit on how high a price may be charged for a product, commodity, or service. Governments typically impose price ceilings when high inflation, an investment bubble, or monopoly control threatens to make essential goods prohibitively expensive. Such conditions can occur during periods of high inflation, in the event of an investment bubble, or in the case of monopoly ownership of a product.
There is substantial research showing that under certain circumstances, price ceilings can, paradoxically, lead to higher prices. The leading explanation is that price ceilings can coordinate collusion among suppliers who would otherwise compete on price. More precisely, forming a cartel becomes profitable by enabling nominally competing firms to act like a monopoly, limiting quantities and raising prices.
However, forming a cartel is difficult because firms need to agree on quantities and prices, and each firm has an incentive to "cheat" by lowering prices to sell more than it agreed to. A third party, such as a regulator, announcing and enforcing a maximum price level can make it easier for firms to agree on a price and monitor pricing. The regulatory price can be viewed as a focal point that is natural for all parties in the cartel to charge.
Rent controls are a form of price ceiling. These were instituted in the U.S. in the 1940s by President Franklin D. Roosevelt and his newly-formed Office of Price Administration. The Office instituted price ceilings on a wide range of commodities, including rent controls that allowed returning World War II veterans and their families to afford housing.
As predicted by economic models, this policy lowered the supply of rentable properties available to veterans. At the same time, there was an increase in homeownership and the number of homes for sale. This outcome could be explained by landowners converting their rentable properties to sellable ones, due to the financial unviability of the rental market and the lack of incentive for landowners to destroy or leave their properties vacant.
According to the passage, governments are most likely to impose a price ceiling under which of the following conditions?
A. Producers cut prices in an attempt to capture market share.
B. In the presence of high inflation, essential goods have become unaffordable.
C. Market regulators remove controls in a competitive industry.
D. A single firm controls production, but market prices remain stable.
E. Demand for luxury goods declines sharply.
A. Incorrect. When firms are actively lowering prices to capture market share, market forces already push prices downward; a government-imposed ceiling is unnecessary.
B. Correct Answer. The passage states that governments impose price ceilings when persistent inflation threatens to make essential goods unaffordable—exactly the condition described here.
C. Incorrect. Deregulation in a competitive industry generally increases price flexibility and often lowers prices. Without evidence of excessively high prices, a ceiling is unlikely.
D. Incorrect. Monopoly power can warrant a ceiling only when it drives prices above affordable levels. Because this choice specifies that prices remain stable, the critical consumer-harm trigger is absent.
E. Incorrect. Falling demand for luxury goods typically pushes prices down, and such goods are non-essential. A price ceiling is therefore unwarranted.
Answer: B
A price ceiling is a government or group-imposed limit on how high a price may be charged for a product, commodity, or service. Governments typically impose price ceilings when high inflation, an investment bubble, or monopoly control threatens to make essential goods prohibitively expensive. Such conditions can occur during periods of high inflation, in the event of an investment bubble, or in the case of monopoly ownership of a product.
There is substantial research showing that under certain circumstances, price ceilings can, paradoxically, lead to higher prices. The leading explanation is that price ceilings can coordinate collusion among suppliers who would otherwise compete on price. More precisely, forming a cartel becomes profitable by enabling nominally competing firms to act like a monopoly, limiting quantities and raising prices.
However, forming a cartel is difficult because firms need to agree on quantities and prices, and each firm has an incentive to "cheat" by lowering prices to sell more than it agreed to. A third party, such as a regulator, announcing and enforcing a maximum price level can make it easier for firms to agree on a price and monitor pricing. The regulatory price can be viewed as a focal point that is natural for all parties in the cartel to charge.
Rent controls are a form of price ceiling. These were instituted in the U.S. in the 1940s by President Franklin D. Roosevelt and his newly-formed Office of Price Administration. The Office instituted price ceilings on a wide range of commodities, including rent controls that allowed returning World War II veterans and their families to afford housing.
As predicted by economic models, this policy lowered the supply of rentable properties available to veterans. At the same time, there was an increase in homeownership and the number of homes for sale. This outcome could be explained by landowners converting their rentable properties to sellable ones, due to the financial unviability of the rental market and the lack of incentive for landowners to destroy or leave their properties vacant.
According to the passage, governments are most likely to impose a price ceiling under which of the following conditions?
A. Producers cut prices in an attempt to capture market share.
B. In the presence of high inflation, essential goods have become unaffordable.
C. Market regulators remove controls in a competitive industry.
D. A single firm controls production, but market prices remain stable.
E. Demand for luxury goods declines sharply.
A. Incorrect. When firms are actively lowering prices to capture market share, market forces already push prices downward; a government-imposed ceiling is unnecessary.
B. Correct Answer. The passage states that governments impose price ceilings when persistent inflation threatens to make essential goods unaffordable—exactly the condition described here.
C. Incorrect. Deregulation in a competitive industry generally increases price flexibility and often lowers prices. Without evidence of excessively high prices, a ceiling is unlikely.
D. Incorrect. Monopoly power can warrant a ceiling only when it drives prices above affordable levels. Because this choice specifies that prices remain stable, the critical consumer-harm trigger is absent.
E. Incorrect. Falling demand for luxury goods typically pushes prices down, and such goods are non-essential. A price ceiling is therefore unwarranted.
Answer: B
20 May 2025, 22:59
Kudos
Bookmarks
I like the solution - it’s helpful.
