Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Jun 0701:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Jun 0612:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
Struggling to find the right strategies to score a 99 %ile on GMAT Focus? Riya (GMAT 715) boosted her score by 100-points in just 15 days! Discover how the right mentorship, tailored strategies, and an unwavering mindset can transform your GMAT prep.
Jun 0803:00 PM PDT
-04:00 PM PDT
15 Full-length GMAT FE mocks with insightful analytics, weakness diagnosis, and video explanations!
Jun 0808:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
A powerful GMAT course taught live online + 6 months of access to TTP OnDemand GMAT Masterclass included! Mon/Wed June 8, 2026 →August 12, 2026 8:00pm-10:00pm EST
Jun 1006:00 AM PDT
-06:15 PM PDT
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..
Jun 1111:00 AM EDT
-01:00 PM EDT
TTP GMAT OnDemand gives serious students 400+ hours of expert video instruction, the full TTP course, AI support, weekly office hours, and a 715+ score guarantee—all built for elite GMAT score improvement.
02 Jun 2025, 23:55
Kudos
Bookmarks
D
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
45% (02:10) correct
55%
(02:33)
wrong
based on 103
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Apex Corporation is facing negligence claims from workers severely injured by its industrial solvent. The company provided comprehensive safety protocols and protective gear, but the employees involved disregarded these measures. Corporate lawyers argue that this willful negligence invalidates all liability claims against Apex. Consequently, legal challenges to the company's waiver of liability should be dismissed as without merit, since the affected workers failed to exercise due care.
The argument that legal challenges to the waiver should be dismissed as without merit depends on assuming which of the following?
A) Companies facing liability claims must demonstrate intentional misconduct by employees to avoid legal accountability.
B) The employment contracts of the injured workers explicitly included clauses releasing the company from liability for safety protocol violations.
C) Industry-standard safety protocols for handling industrial solvents are typically effective when properly followed.
D) Apex Corporation bears no responsibility for injuries directly resulting from workers' violations of mandatory safety protocols.
E) The injured employees had previously ignored safety procedures without facing disciplinary action.
The argument that legal challenges to the waiver should be dismissed as without merit depends on assuming which of the following?
A) Companies facing liability claims must demonstrate intentional misconduct by employees to avoid legal accountability.
B) The employment contracts of the injured workers explicitly included clauses releasing the company from liability for safety protocol violations.
C) Industry-standard safety protocols for handling industrial solvents are typically effective when properly followed.
D) Apex Corporation bears no responsibility for injuries directly resulting from workers' violations of mandatory safety protocols.
E) The injured employees had previously ignored safety procedures without facing disciplinary action.
Show SpoilerHints
Identify the unstated premise enabling the conclusion's dismissal of challenges. Apply negation to each option: Which negation fundamentally undermines the argument that challenges are 'without merit'?
Show SpoilerExplanations
A) Incorrect. This establishes a sufficient condition (misconduct avoiding liability) but not a necessary one. Negation: Even if misconduct isn't required to avoid liability, Apex's argument could still hold through negligence-based waiver.
B) Incorrect. While contractual terms may support the argument, they aren't necessary; liability could be waived by statute or precedent. Negation: Absent such contracts, statutory waiver principles could still validate the argument.
C) Incorrect. Industry standards are irrelevant to whether Apex's liability is negated by worker negligence. Negation: Inconsistent industry standards wouldn't undermine the core logic about responsibility.
D) Correct. The argument assumes that workers' safety violations nullify the company's responsibility. Negation: If Apex remains responsible despite protocol violations, the claim that legal challenges are without merit collapses.
E) Incorrect. Past behavior is unrelated to the current incident's liability determination. Negation: Lack of prior violations doesn't prevent the argument from applying to this case.
Overall Explanation: The argument necessitates assumption A to link worker negligence to liability waiver. Without it, the dismissal of legal challenges fails logically. B/C misrepresent the argument's basis, D overgeneralizes, and E introduces irrelevant history.
B) Incorrect. While contractual terms may support the argument, they aren't necessary; liability could be waived by statute or precedent. Negation: Absent such contracts, statutory waiver principles could still validate the argument.
C) Incorrect. Industry standards are irrelevant to whether Apex's liability is negated by worker negligence. Negation: Inconsistent industry standards wouldn't undermine the core logic about responsibility.
D) Correct. The argument assumes that workers' safety violations nullify the company's responsibility. Negation: If Apex remains responsible despite protocol violations, the claim that legal challenges are without merit collapses.
E) Incorrect. Past behavior is unrelated to the current incident's liability determination. Negation: Lack of prior violations doesn't prevent the argument from applying to this case.
Overall Explanation: The argument necessitates assumption A to link worker negligence to liability waiver. Without it, the dismissal of legal challenges fails logically. B/C misrepresent the argument's basis, D overgeneralizes, and E introduces irrelevant history.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
665 posts
