Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
02 Jun 2025, 23:55
Kudos
Bookmarks
D
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
45% (02:10) correct
55%
(02:33)
wrong
based on 103
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Apex Corporation is facing negligence claims from workers severely injured by its industrial solvent. The company provided comprehensive safety protocols and protective gear, but the employees involved disregarded these measures. Corporate lawyers argue that this willful negligence invalidates all liability claims against Apex. Consequently, legal challenges to the company's waiver of liability should be dismissed as without merit, since the affected workers failed to exercise due care.
The argument that legal challenges to the waiver should be dismissed as without merit depends on assuming which of the following?
A) Companies facing liability claims must demonstrate intentional misconduct by employees to avoid legal accountability.
B) The employment contracts of the injured workers explicitly included clauses releasing the company from liability for safety protocol violations.
C) Industry-standard safety protocols for handling industrial solvents are typically effective when properly followed.
D) Apex Corporation bears no responsibility for injuries directly resulting from workers' violations of mandatory safety protocols.
E) The injured employees had previously ignored safety procedures without facing disciplinary action.
The argument that legal challenges to the waiver should be dismissed as without merit depends on assuming which of the following?
A) Companies facing liability claims must demonstrate intentional misconduct by employees to avoid legal accountability.
B) The employment contracts of the injured workers explicitly included clauses releasing the company from liability for safety protocol violations.
C) Industry-standard safety protocols for handling industrial solvents are typically effective when properly followed.
D) Apex Corporation bears no responsibility for injuries directly resulting from workers' violations of mandatory safety protocols.
E) The injured employees had previously ignored safety procedures without facing disciplinary action.
Show SpoilerHints
Identify the unstated premise enabling the conclusion's dismissal of challenges. Apply negation to each option: Which negation fundamentally undermines the argument that challenges are 'without merit'?
Show SpoilerExplanations
A) Incorrect. This establishes a sufficient condition (misconduct avoiding liability) but not a necessary one. Negation: Even if misconduct isn't required to avoid liability, Apex's argument could still hold through negligence-based waiver.
B) Incorrect. While contractual terms may support the argument, they aren't necessary; liability could be waived by statute or precedent. Negation: Absent such contracts, statutory waiver principles could still validate the argument.
C) Incorrect. Industry standards are irrelevant to whether Apex's liability is negated by worker negligence. Negation: Inconsistent industry standards wouldn't undermine the core logic about responsibility.
D) Correct. The argument assumes that workers' safety violations nullify the company's responsibility. Negation: If Apex remains responsible despite protocol violations, the claim that legal challenges are without merit collapses.
E) Incorrect. Past behavior is unrelated to the current incident's liability determination. Negation: Lack of prior violations doesn't prevent the argument from applying to this case.
Overall Explanation: The argument necessitates assumption A to link worker negligence to liability waiver. Without it, the dismissal of legal challenges fails logically. B/C misrepresent the argument's basis, D overgeneralizes, and E introduces irrelevant history.
B) Incorrect. While contractual terms may support the argument, they aren't necessary; liability could be waived by statute or precedent. Negation: Absent such contracts, statutory waiver principles could still validate the argument.
C) Incorrect. Industry standards are irrelevant to whether Apex's liability is negated by worker negligence. Negation: Inconsistent industry standards wouldn't undermine the core logic about responsibility.
D) Correct. The argument assumes that workers' safety violations nullify the company's responsibility. Negation: If Apex remains responsible despite protocol violations, the claim that legal challenges are without merit collapses.
E) Incorrect. Past behavior is unrelated to the current incident's liability determination. Negation: Lack of prior violations doesn't prevent the argument from applying to this case.
Overall Explanation: The argument necessitates assumption A to link worker negligence to liability waiver. Without it, the dismissal of legal challenges fails logically. B/C misrepresent the argument's basis, D overgeneralizes, and E introduces irrelevant history.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
189 posts
