An analysis published in August by researchers at the University of

Question

An analysis published in August by researchers at the University of Wisconsin-Madison suggests the debunking messages posted by medical experts on TikTok are more effective if overlaid with high-tempo music. The academics believe the music helps swamp the brain’s ability to present counter-arguments, making the message more persuasive to the listener.

The argument above assumes which of the following?

A) Counter-arguments are a significant barrier to persuading viewers in debunking videos.
B) The increase in persuasiveness is not primarily due to factors unrelated to counter-arguments.
C) High-tempo music reduces the likelihood of viewers dismissing the message without consideration.
D) Medical experts optimize message content to align with musical elements.
E) Listeners who are persuaded by the messages are always aware of the music's effects.

Focus on identifying the necessary condition for the argument's causal claim. What idea must be true for the link between music and persuasiveness via counter-arguments to hold? 
 
A) While counter-arguments being a barrier is implied, the argument does not assume they are a significant barrier; it only claims that reducing them helps. Other factors might dominate, making this unsupported as a necessary assumption.
B) Correct - The argument relies on the music's effect being primarily through swamping counter-arguments. If negated ('The increase IS primarily due to other factors'), the argument's causal mechanism no longer holds.
C) While reducing dismissal could occur with music, this is not required by the argument's reasoning. Even if music does not reduce such dismissal, it could still swamp counter-arguments and increase persuasiveness.
D) Irrelevant to the causal mechanism; the argument does not depend on experts optimizing content.
E) Awareness of effects is not necessary for the persuasive effect to occur; the argument focuses on the mechanism, not listener consciousness.

The argument claims that high-tempo music increases persuasiveness by swamping the brain's counter-arguments. The necessary unstated assumption is that the persuasiveness increase is not primarily caused by factors unrelated to counter-arguments. Option B correctly states this assumption, as without it, alternative explanations would invalidate the music-to-counter-arguments causality. Distractor A, now revised to 'a significant barrier,' tempts by overstating a premise but is not strictly necessary. C discusses a possible effect but not one required for the specific causal chain.

Aabhash777 · Answer

Argument:

High Tempo Music > Decrease in Brain’s Ability to Counter-Argument > Increase in Effectiveness of Message

Assumption:
1. Brain’s Ability to Counter-Argue is related to Effectiveness of Message
Option B matches the negative technique
Option A and C are already mentioned in the argument.

Silvio1998 · Answer

I chose A, I see why B is the correct answer choice.. However, I don't see why A is incorrect.. if counter-arguments are "not" a significant barrier to persuading viewers in debunking videos, then there is no point in saying "music helps swam the brain's ability to present counter-argument, making, therefore, the message more persuasive to the listener.. 
Where am I wrong in this reasoning?

Avantika1765# · Answer

Can someone explai why is it B option? and not C?

DmitryFarberMPrep · Answer

Silvio1998

You're absolutely right. This question needs some revision. Answer choice A is absolutely a necessary assumption, for exactly the reason you state. If counter-arguments aren't a significant problem to overcome, then it doesn't make sense to conclude that bypassing them is what makes the messages in these posts more persuasive.

B is also necessary, if less interesting. It's basically a form of the all-purpose assumption "It's not something else." If we think X causes Y, we are assuming the cause isn't something else, and that's all B is really saying.

Avantika1765# 
C is making a specific assertion that isn't strictly necessary to the argument. We're not trying to support the idea that the music is helpful. We just want to support the idea that it is helpful for the reason the academics suggest. So we don't necessarily need to know how likely people are to dismiss a message "without consideration."

An analysis published in August by researchers at the University of

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards