Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
What does test anxiety really look like on the GMAT? For many test takers, it does not look like a panic attack. Instead, it shows up as brain fog, rereading, negative comparisons, mental noise....
This Labor Day, turn your hard work into real score gains. From 615→715 in 15 days to 705 in 30 days, our students prove what's possible with personalized, expert guidance. Save up to 25% on 1-on-1 tutoring.
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful EA course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Perfect class schedule and easy course access for working professionals. Class starts Sundays Sept. 6, 2026.
Tejas studied hard but kept repeating the same mistakes. After 3 attempts at 645, a focused 4-week strategy helped him identify and fix what was holding him back—leading to a 695 with just 12–15 hours of study per week.
A complete walkthrough of GMAT Club’s free 12-week GMAT study plan: what you study each week, how progress and goals are tracked, how the error log works, and how your practice unlocks paid tools at no cost.
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway
Three MBA applications. Three rejections. No interview invites. A year later, Aman was admitted to Cambridge Judge, SMU, and IMD. In this episode of MBA Admit Stories, Aman shares how he rebuilt his MBA application...
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
Originally posted by Bunuel on 15 Sep 2025, 03:58.
Last edited by Bunuel on 15 Jul 2026, 04:47, edited 2 times in total.
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
33
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Show timer
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide Answer
Correct Answer
Hide
Show
History
Dropdown 1: 20th
Dropdown 2: more than 150%
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Select the dropdowns below and click "Submit" to add this question to your Error log.
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
33%
(02:50)
correct 67%
(03:00)
wrong
based on 280
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The chart shows the percentage of the total population of Country X, measured at the end of each century, living in each of its four regions (Lowland, Highland, Coastal, and Desert). In each century, the population of every region increased compared with the prior century.
From each drop-down menu, select the option that creates the most accurate statement based on the information given.
Country X’s total population had to increase by the greatest percentage from the previous century to the Century, when the total population had to increase by .
Originally posted by Bunuel on 23 Sep 2025, 01:00.
Last edited by Bunuel on 15 Jul 2026, 04:49, edited 2 times in total.
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Official Solution:
Bunuel
The chart shows the percentage of the total population of Country X, measured at the end of each century, living in each of its four regions (Lowland, Highland, Coastal, and Desert). In each century, the population of every region increased compared with the prior century.
From each drop-down menu, select the option that creates the most accurate statement based on the information given.
Country X’s total population had to increase by the greatest percentage from the previous century to the Century, when the total population had to increase by .
Show more
To determine how much the total population had to increase from one century to the next, focus on the region whose share decreased the most. Since every region’s actual population increased, the smaller percentage in the next century still had to represent more people than the larger percentage in the previous century. For example, if a region’s share fell from 50% to 40%, then 40% of the new total had to be greater than 50% of the previous total.
• 17th to 18th Century: Desert fell from 50% to 40%. Suppose the total population in the 17th Century was 100, so Desert had 50 people. In the 18th Century, Desert’s population was more than 50 and represented 40% of the new total. For 40% of the new total to exceed 50, the new total must have been more than 125, implying an increase of more than 25%.
• 18th to 19th Century: Desert fell from 40% to 25%. If the 18th-Century total was 100, then Desert had 40 people. In the 19th Century, 25% of the new total had to exceed 40, so the new total had to be more than 160, which means an increase of more than 60%.
• 19th to 20th Century: Desert fell from 25% to 10%. If the 19th-Century total was 100, then Desert had 25 people. In the 20th Century, 10% of the new total had to exceed 25, so the new total had to be more than 250. Thus, the new total had to be more than 2.5 times the previous total, which corresponds to an increase of more than 150%.
Thus, Country X’s total population had to increase by the greatest percentage from the 19th Century to the 20th Century, when it had to increase by more than 150%.
The intuition is as follows: Suppose there are 100 people living in the 19th century. For example, 25 of them lived in the desert. In the 20th century, this group increased by an amount x. Although their total number grew, their percentage share fell to 10%. Thus, 25 + x now equals 10% of the total population. Therefore, the total population is 10 times (25 + x), which is greater than 250, representing an increase of more than 150%. Hope this makes sense.
fugaquasi
Hi Bunuel , Im a confused why the second part is more than 150%, actually im confused how can we even tell anything about the total population from a graph of relative populations that are all increasing and always add upto 100 ?
The chart shows the percentage of the total population of Country X, measured at the end of each century, living in each of its four regions (Lowland, Highland, Coastal, and Desert). In each century, the population of every region increased compared with the prior century.
From each drop-down menu, select the option that creates the most accurate statement based on the information given.
The largest percentage increase in the total population from one century to the next occurred in the Century, when the total population increased by .
The largest percentage increase in the total population from one century to the next occurred in the Century, when the total population increased by .
Largest population increase: Here we are bothered only about bars which are going up between one century to other, Why because, the decrease which are happening in another regions are compensated by the increase.
from 17th to 18th century: Net increase is 5+7=12 (Lowland 5% and Coastal 7%) 18th to 19th: Net increase is 16 (Lowland 3% Coastal 13%) 19th to 20th: Net increase is 22 (Lowland 2 and Coastal 20) Thus highest increase is in 20th century
Now we can take the highest increase which happened, that is 19th century coastal from 25% to 45% Let the overall population in 19th be x and 20th be y We have 25% of X=45% of Y Or X/4=9Y/20 X=9Y/5 X is approximately 1.8Y, which is more than 160%
Bunuel I really liked the question. I have two questions. First, why are we calculating on the basis of Desert percentages? Second, • 17th to 18th Century: an increase of more than 25%. • 18th to 19th Century: increase of more than 60%. • 19th to 20th Century: an increase of more than 150%.
so how come the largest increase occurred in the 20th Century? It is possible that the largest increase occurred in 17th to 18th?
Bunuel
To determine the increase in total population from one century to the next, focus on the region whose share decreased the most. Since every region’s population increased, a decline in share means that the total must have risen enough to offset this growth.
• 17th to 18th Century: Desert fell from 50% to 40%. Suppose the total population in the 17th Century was 100, so Desert had 50 people. In the 18th Century, Desert’s population was more than 50, which represented 40% of the new total. For 40% to exceed 50, the new total must have been more than 125, implying an increase of more than 25%. • 18th to 19th Century: Desert fell from 40% to 25%. If the 18th-Century total was 100, then Desert had 40 people. In the 19th Century, 25% had to exceed 40, so the new total had to be more than 160, which means an increase of more than 60%. • 19th to 20th Century: Desert fell from 25% to 10%. If the 19th-Century total was 100, then Desert had 25 people. In the 20th Century, 10% had to exceed 25, so the new total had to be more than 250. This means the population increased by more than 2.5 times, which corresponds to an increase of more than 150%.
Thus, the largest increase occurred in the 20th Century, when the total population rose by more than 150% compared with the 19th Century.
Both of your questions come from the same idea, so let me take them in order.
Why we lean on the Desert bars
Every region tells us something, because every region's head-count went up while its share may have gone down. When a region's share falls but its population still rises, the total must have grown enough to make that possible. So each region gives us a minimum growth for the total - and we want the biggest minimum, i.e. the tightest guarantee.
The biggest share drop gives the biggest required jump. Check the 19th-20th step:
- Desert:25% -> 10%. For 10% of the new total to beat 25% of the old, the total must be at least 2.5× bigger -> increase > 150%. - Highland:32% -> 25%. That only forces about 1.28× -> increase > ~28%.
Desert's share falls the most every century, so it always sets the strongest floor. That's the only reason we use it - not because Desert is special, but because it squeezes out the largest guaranteed increase.
Why the 20th wins even though these are just minimums
You're completely right that > 25%, > 60%, > 150% are floors, not exact values. Here's the key: the question asks for the most accurate statement the data forces. Compare the floors you found - they climb 25% -> 60% -> 150%. The 20th century's guaranteed minimum by itself (> 150%) already towers over what the earlier steps are even required to reach.
And notice the answer options: the 18th and 19th choices come with an upper cap ("less than 60%," "less than 150%") that the graph can't confirm - nothing stops those from being higher. Only "more than 150%" is open-ended, so only the 20th-century pairing is a statement the data actually pins down.
That's why the answer is 20th Century, more than 150%.
Answer: Dropdown 1: 20th; Dropdown 2: more than 150%
WildSnow
Bunuel I really liked the question. I have two questions. First, why are we calculating on the basis of Desert percentages? Second, • 17th to 18th Century: an increase of more than 25%. • 18th to 19th Century: increase of more than 60%. • 19th to 20th Century: an increase of more than 150%.
so how come the largest increase occurred in the 20th Century? It is possible that the largest increase occurred in 17th to 18th?