Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 13:06 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 13:06
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,785
Own Kudos:
810,849
 [1]
Given Kudos: 105,853
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,785
Kudos: 810,849
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,785
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,853
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,785
Kudos: 810,849
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
paragw
Joined: 17 May 2024
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 189
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 38
Posts: 189
Kudos: 193
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
rahumangal
Joined: 20 Nov 2022
Last visit: 07 Apr 2026
Posts: 71
Own Kudos:
66
 [1]
Given Kudos: 316
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Real Estate
GPA: 3.99
WE:Engineering (Technology)
Products:
Posts: 71
Kudos: 66
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Museum curator: Some old buildings in our city have been reconstructed after earthquakes, and lively new public spaces have emerged within them. Some historians maintain that . They preserve the same architectural style and are often indistinguishable from the older structures. However, . That sense of authenticity is diminished when a building is known to be a reconstruction.

Which of the following best describes the roles of the two portions in boldface?

A. The first is a premise of the curator’s argument; the second addresses an objection to the curator’s conclusion.
B. The first presents evidence for a claim; the second explains why that evidence supports the curator’s conclusion.
C. The first defends an assumption made by the curator; the second explains why the curator’s conclusion undermines the position that the curator challenges.
D. The first is the claim that the curator directly challenges; the second is the conclusion defended by the curator’s argument.
E. The first is used to support the position that the curator opposes; the second elaborates on the justification for the curator’s conclusion.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more

1st BF - used as a reasoning to support the claim that these reconstructed buildings are as worthy of admiration as the originals
2nd BF- used to further elaborate the reasoning part of what makes historic buildings valuable is that they are authentic physical links to earlier generations used by the curator as to why these buildings are not worthy of admiration
Only E fits this pattern
Ans-E
User avatar
batman10bigman
Joined: 23 Apr 2025
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
38
 [1]
Given Kudos: 11
Products:
Posts: 44
Kudos: 38
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Museum curator: Some old buildings in our city have been reconstructed after earthquakes, and lively new public spaces have emerged within them. Some historians maintain that these reconstructed buildings are as worthy of admiration as the originals. They preserve the same architectural style and are often indistinguishable from the older structures. However, part of what makes historic buildings valuable is that they are authentic physical links to earlier generations. That sense of authenticity is diminished when a building is known to be a reconstruction.

Which of the following best describes the roles of the two portions in boldface?

A. The first is a premise of the curator’s argument; the second addresses an objection to the curator’s conclusion.
B. The first presents evidence for a claim; the second explains why that evidence supports the curator’s conclusion.
C. The first defends an assumption made by the curator; the second explains why the curator’s conclusion undermines the position that the curator challenges.
D. The first is the claim that the curator directly challenges; the second is the conclusion defended by the curator’s argument.
E. The first is used to support the position that the curator opposes; the second elaborates on the justification for the curator’s conclusion.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
Here is why I think some of the options aren't correct:

A: The first part of this option isn't the curators premise, its what the historians say. So its wrong

B: The first part is right, the second part of this option doesn't explain why first supports the curator (first opposes him). This is incorrect.

C: The first part of this option doesn't defend the curator's assumption; the second doesn't undermine anything. This is incorrect.

D: The first isn't "the claim challenged", it is the evidence for the opposing view. Hence this is wrong

E: The boldface 1 backs the historians view, i.e, reconstructions = originals. The boldface 2 explains why the curator rejects that (authenticity lost)
Hence right

Option E
User avatar
linnet
Joined: 11 Dec 2025
Last visit: 22 Jan 2026
Posts: 81
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 81
Kudos: 42
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The first sentence is a premise ad the second sentence addresses an objection to the curators conclusion.
The answer is A
User avatar
sunshineeee
Joined: 17 May 2020
Last visit: 09 Apr 2026
Posts: 96
Own Kudos:
22
 [1]
Given Kudos: 223
Location: Indonesia
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
For this Bolface CR model, my strategy is
0. Simplify the core meaning
1. To find the conclusion owned by the author, then
2. Find its reasoning

In this statement, we can simplify
- OLD BUILDING reconstructed with NEW public SPACES
- 1st opinion -> some historians: RECONSTRUCTED (OLD+NEW) building = worthy as originals (OLD)
- WHY? because the NEW=OLD

- 2nd opinion (the author main conclusion) -> spot HOWEVER (meaning: contrast/different/counter the previous statetment) -> OLD/HISTORICAL = AUTHENTICITY physical links to earlier generations
- WHY -> because AUTENTHICITY diminished when RECONSTRUCTED (OLD+NEW)

So, we can grasp
the author conclusion -> 2nd opinion and challenge the 1st opinion.

Then, the relevant answer is E where (1) the position that curator oposes, (2) the justifications/WHY behind the curator's conclusion

To make sure others incorrect, I did not spot one by one, just to review why they might wrong in min 1 out of 2. For example,
A. This is the counter of the curator's conclusion/main statement
B. They talk about EVIDENCE, but (1) and (2) not correlate positively for evidence-claim relationship
C. (1) It not defending the curator's assumption, because it's evidence from others historians opinions
D. (1) It is not a claim, but an evidence for the claim that the curator challenges, (2) is not the conclusion, but the WHY/argument to support the conclusion

Bunuel
Quote:
Museum curator: Some old buildings in our city have been reconstructed after earthquakes, and lively new public spaces have emerged within them. Some historians maintain that these reconstructed buildings are as worthy of admiration as the originals. They preserve the same architectural style and are often indistinguishable from the older structures. However, part of what makes historic buildings valuable is that they are authentic physical links to earlier generations. That sense of authenticity is diminished when a building is known to be a reconstruction.

Which of the following best describes the roles of the two portions in boldface?

A. The first is a premise of the curator’s argument; the second addresses an objection to the curator’s conclusion.
B. The first presents evidence for a claim; the second explains why that evidence supports the curator’s conclusion.
C. The first defends an assumption made by the curator; the second explains why the curator’s conclusion undermines the position that the curator challenges.
D. The first is the claim that the curator directly challenges; the second is the conclusion defended by the curator’s argument.
E. The first is used to support the position that the curator opposes; the second elaborates on the justification for the curator’s conclusion.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
User avatar
Ayeka
Joined: 26 May 2024
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 528
Own Kudos:
402
 [1]
Given Kudos: 158
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q82 V83 DI80
GPA: 4.2
Schools: ISB
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q82 V83 DI80
Posts: 528
Kudos: 402
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Boldface 1 is a premsie that is used to support the idea that reconstruction are just as good as the originals. Boldface 2 explains the reasoning behind why the curator disagrees with the historians.

A. The first supports the historians and is mot a premise for curator.......No
B. The first does not support the curator conclusion.......No
C. The first does not defend an assumptikn made by curator and teh curator actually amkes a different point......No
D. The first statement is not the claim being challenged but it is evidence for that claim. And teh second statement is not a conclusion......No
E. The first boldface is justification for tge historians position, which the curator opposes and second boldface explains the curators reasoning ........Answer

E
User avatar
sitrem
Joined: 19 Nov 2025
Last visit: 24 Feb 2026
Posts: 91
Own Kudos:
84
 [1]
Given Kudos: 238
Posts: 91
Kudos: 84
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
E
A. Incorrect
The second boldface is not an objection to the curator's argument, it supports it.
B. Incorrect
The evidence in the first boldface supports the historian's argument, not the curator's.
C. Incorrect
The first boldface does not defend an assumption made by the curator, but supports the opposing side (the one of the historians)
D. Incorrect
The first boldface is not the claim the curator challenges (that one is the sentence right before) and the second supports the conclusion but is not the conclusion itself
E. Correct
The first boldface support the side that opposes the curator, the second supports the curator's conclusion by adding an explanation of why he thinks that.
User avatar
Archit3110
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 8,628
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 243
Status:You learn more from failure than from success.
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Marketing
GMAT Focus 1: 545 Q79 V79 DI73
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q83 V82 DI81
GPA: 4
WE:Marketing (Energy)
Products:
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q83 V82 DI81
Posts: 8,628
Kudos: 5,190
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Museum curator: Some old buildings in our city have been reconstructed after earthquakes, and lively new public spaces have emerged within them. Some historians maintain that these reconstructed buildings are as worthy of admiration as the originals. They preserve the same architectural style and are often indistinguishable from the older structures. However, part of what makes historic buildings valuable is that they are authentic physical links to earlier generations. That sense of authenticity is diminished when a building is known to be a reconstruction.

BF 1: the curator is giving reason to strengthen or make its argument hold strong

BF2 : is a weakener to the argument discussed

Which of the following best describes the roles of the two portions in boldface?

A. The first is a premise of the curator’s argument; the second addresses an objection to the curator’s conclusion.

The option is correct ; as the BF1 the premise tone is set and in the BF2 the weakening of the argument is done with a fact

B. The first presents evidence for a claim; the second explains why that evidence supports the curator’s conclusion.

BF 1 is not a evidence for a claim and BF 2 is not supporting BF1

C. The first defends an assumption made by the curator; the second explains why the curator’s conclusion undermines the position that the curator challenges.
BF 1 is not defending the assumption , BF 2 is a weakener but not to a challenge

D. The first is the claim that the curator directly challenges; the second is the conclusion defended by the curator’s argument.
BF 1 is a strengther fact not a weakener ; BF 2 is not defending BF1

E. The first is used to support the position that the curator opposes; the second elaborates on the justification for the curator’s conclusion.
BF 1 is a support not weakener .. BF 2 is fact stated to weaken BF 1

OPTION A is correct
avatar
ManifestDreamMBA
Joined: 17 Sep 2024
Last visit: 21 Feb 2026
Posts: 1,387
Own Kudos:
897
 [1]
Given Kudos: 243
Posts: 1,387
Kudos: 897
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
First BF is fact on which "some historian's" calim depend. Second BF supports curators' conclusion.
A - out BF1 is not curator's premise
B - historians and author counter and hence, this doesn't fit
C - BF1 doesn't defend any assumption made y curator
D - BF2 is not curator's conclusion
E - this works
Bunuel
Museum curator: Some old buildings in our city have been reconstructed after earthquakes, and lively new public spaces have emerged within them. Some historians maintain that these reconstructed buildings are as worthy of admiration as the originals. They preserve the same architectural style and are often indistinguishable from the older structures. However, part of what makes historic buildings valuable is that they are authentic physical links to earlier generations. That sense of authenticity is diminished when a building is known to be a reconstruction.

Which of the following best describes the roles of the two portions in boldface?

A. The first is a premise of the curator’s argument; the second addresses an objection to the curator’s conclusion.
B. The first presents evidence for a claim; the second explains why that evidence supports the curator’s conclusion.
C. The first defends an assumption made by the curator; the second explains why the curator’s conclusion undermines the position that the curator challenges.
D. The first is the claim that the curator directly challenges; the second is the conclusion defended by the curator’s argument.
E. The first is used to support the position that the curator opposes; the second elaborates on the justification for the curator’s conclusion.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
User avatar
vikramadityaa
Joined: 28 Jul 2025
Last visit: 23 Dec 2025
Posts: 55
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 55
Kudos: 41
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Museum curator: Some old buildings in our city have been reconstructed after earthquakes, and lively new public spaces have emerged within them. Some historians maintain that these reconstructed buildings are as worthy of admiration as the originals. They preserve the same architectural style and are often indistinguishable from the older structures. However, part of what makes historic buildings valuable is that they are authentic physical links to earlier generations. That sense of authenticity is diminished when a building is known to be a reconstruction.

Which of the following best describes the roles of the two portions in boldface?

A. The first is a premise of the curator’s argument; the second addresses an objection to the curator’s conclusion.
B. The first presents evidence for a claim; the second explains why that evidence supports the curator’s conclusion.
C. The first defends an assumption made by the curator; the second explains why the curator’s conclusion undermines the position that the curator challenges.
D. The first is the claim that the curator directly challenges; the second is the conclusion defended by the curator’s argument.
E. The first is used to support the position that the curator opposes; the second elaborates on the justification for the curator’s conclusion.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
Argument Structure:
• Background: Some old buildings were reconstructed, and new public spaces emerged.
• Opposing view: Some historians say reconstructed buildings are as worthy of admiration as originals because they preserve the same style and look indistinguishable.
• Curator's view: Historic view comes from being an authentic physical link to the past.
• Conclusion: That sense of authenticity is diminished when a building is known to be a reconstruction.

First Boldface: It supports the statement that the curator disagrees with.
Second Boldface: This is the curator's conclusion.

Hence, OPTION E.
User avatar
harishg
Joined: 18 Dec 2018
Last visit: 09 Apr 2026
Posts: 176
Own Kudos:
174
 [1]
Given Kudos: 31
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q88 V84 DI81
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q88 V84 DI81
Posts: 176
Kudos: 174
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The first boldface is denoting a premise which is used to support a conclusion which the curator is opposing. On the other hand, the second boldface is further making the reader understand why the curator’a conclusion is justified, after all.

This is being conveyed in Option E as the first BF is indeed a premise and supports the opposed conclusion. The second BF elaborates further on the actual conclusion.

Therefore, Option E
User avatar
forestmayank
Joined: 05 Nov 2025
Last visit: 31 Mar 2026
Posts: 103
Own Kudos:
87
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 103
Kudos: 87
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Understanding from the paragraph:
a. Some old buildings have been reconstructed
b. Some historians say they are as worthy as original because of similar architectural style.

Ist bold statement - Underscores the reason for the historians' argument.

After this the curator says 'However' which shows contradiction from the above statement stating links to earlier generations might be diminished or lost due to the reconstruction. Then,
IInd bold statement - Curator states that authenticity is diminished due to reconstruction. This contradicts the historians' views.

Option E - First statement supports the position that the curator opposes - Yes
Second elaborates on justification of curator's conclusion - Yes

Hence, answer would be Option E
User avatar
AviNFC
Joined: 31 May 2023
Last visit: 10 Apr 2026
Posts: 306
Own Kudos:
366
 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 306
Kudos: 366
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. The first is a premise of the curator’s argument; the second addresses an objection to the curator’s conclusion. First is evidence of historian's argument. No objection to curator's conclusion is given.
B. The first presents evidence for a claim; the second explains why that evidence supports the curator’s conclusion. first part is correct. But, this evidence is not used by the curator to support his conclusion. Rather he opposes it.
C. The first defends an assumption made by the curator; the second explains why the curator’s conclusion undermines the position that the curator challenges. first is not an assumption but evidence to a claim. second is elaboration of the conclusion.
D. The first is the claim that the curator directly challenges; the second is the conclusion defended by the curator’s argument. first is not a claim, but an evidence. second is not a direct conclusion, but an elaboration.
E. The first is used to support the position that the curator opposes; the second elaborates on the justification for the curator’s conclusion. Correct. first part has been used to support the historian's claim. And curator opposes this claim. In second part curator explains why he rejects the historians claim.

Ans E
User avatar
jefferyillman
Joined: 01 Dec 2024
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 50
Own Kudos:
27
 [1]
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 50
Kudos: 27
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
answer E

a first is the historians veiw not curators
b first does not present evidence
c first is the historians view not the curators assumption
d not a claim dirctly challenged. too harsh
e first is support for something curator opposes, the second tell the reason for curators conclusion CORRECT
Bunuel
Museum curator: Some old buildings in our city have been reconstructed after earthquakes, and lively new public spaces have emerged within them. Some historians maintain that these reconstructed buildings are as worthy of admiration as the originals. They preserve the same architectural style and are often indistinguishable from the older structures. However, part of what makes historic buildings valuable is that they are authentic physical links to earlier generations. That sense of authenticity is diminished when a building is known to be a reconstruction.

Which of the following best describes the roles of the two portions in boldface?

A. The first is a premise of the curator’s argument; the second addresses an objection to the curator’s conclusion.
B. The first presents evidence for a claim; the second explains why that evidence supports the curator’s conclusion.
C. The first defends an assumption made by the curator; the second explains why the curator’s conclusion undermines the position that the curator challenges.
D. The first is the claim that the curator directly challenges; the second is the conclusion defended by the curator’s argument.
E. The first is used to support the position that the curator opposes; the second elaborates on the justification for the curator’s conclusion.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
User avatar
iBN
Joined: 13 Jan 2025
Last visit: 06 Mar 2026
Posts: 45
Own Kudos:
36
 [1]
Given Kudos: 25
Location: India
WE:Marketing (Consulting)
Products:
Posts: 45
Kudos: 36
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Museum curator: Some old buildings in our city have been reconstructed after earthquakes, and lively new public spaces have emerged within them. Some historians maintain that these reconstructed buildings are as worthy of admiration as the originals. They preserve the same architectural style and are often indistinguishable from the older structures. However, part of what makes historic buildings valuable is that they are authentic physical links to earlier generations. That sense of authenticity is diminished when a building is known to be a reconstruction.

Which of the following best describes the roles of the two portions in boldface?

A. The first is a premise of the curator’s argument; the second addresses an objection to the curator’s conclusion.
B. The first presents evidence for a claim; the second explains why that evidence supports the curator’s conclusion.
C. The first defends an assumption made by the curator; the second explains why the curator’s conclusion undermines the position that the curator challenges.
D. The first is the claim that the curator directly challenges; the second is the conclusion defended by the curator’s argument.
E. The first is used to support the position that the curator opposes; the second elaborates on the justification for the curator’s conclusion.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more

Curator is someone who is against the notion of some historians support of reconstruction of old buildings
Boldface 1- It is a positive statement supporting why some historians support reconstruction/renovation of old buildings ..CURATOR is against this notion of historian
Boldface 2 - Supporting statement or premise to the curator's argument.

Option A wrong because first boldface is not the curator's argument. Reject immediately
Option B - Wrong ..second boldface is wrong as curator's conclusion is against the statements of first boldface.
Option C - Wrong - there is no assumption in the first boldface. its a premise to why historians support renovation. reject immediately
Option D - Wrong - First boldface is not a claim its a premise but yes curator is directly challenging the notion...still wrong..second boldface is not a conclusion its a premise to curator's conclusion. more than enough reason to reject
OPTION E - CORRECT - Fits in with our pre-thinking . first boldface is a premise to a notion which curator opposes..second is the justificaiton of curator's conclusion
User avatar
canopyinthecity
Joined: 12 Jul 2025
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 92
Own Kudos:
61
 [1]
Given Kudos: 19
Posts: 92
Kudos: 61
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Curator's View

Conclusion: Restructured buildings are not worthy of admiration as originals

Premise: The original buildings are valuable as they are authentic physical link to earlier generations.

Historians's View

Conclusion: Opposite of curator's view

Premise: Same architectural style and are often indistinguishable from older structures.

(A) Incorrect. The first is not a premise of curator's argument, but of historian's argument.

(B) Incorrect. The first is not an evidence for a claim.

(C) Incorrect. The first is not an assumption made by the curator.

(D) Incorrect. The curator did not challenge the first.

(E) Correct. As mentioned above, the first a premise of opposing view. and second is elaboration of justification of curator's conclusion.
User avatar
flippedeclipse
Joined: 26 Apr 2025
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 105
Own Kudos:
73
 [1]
Given Kudos: 37
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q80 V87 DI80
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q80 V87 DI80
Posts: 105
Kudos: 73
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Museum curator: Some old buildings in our city have been reconstructed after earthquakes, and lively new public spaces have emerged within them. Some historians maintain that these reconstructed buildings are as worthy of admiration as the originals. They preserve the same architectural style and are often indistinguishable from the older structures. However, part of what makes historic buildings valuable is that they are authentic physical links to earlier generations. That sense of authenticity is diminished when a building is known to be a reconstruction.

Which of the following best describes the roles of the two portions in boldface?

A. The first is a premise of the curator’s argument; the second addresses an objection to the curator’s conclusion.
B. The first presents evidence for a claim; the second explains why that evidence supports the curator’s conclusion.
C. The first defends an assumption made by the curator; the second explains why the curator’s conclusion undermines the position that the curator challenges.
D. The first is the claim that the curator directly challenges; the second is the conclusion defended by the curator’s argument.
E. The first is used to support the position that the curator opposes; the second elaborates on the justification for the curator’s conclusion.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more

For a boldface answer choice to be correct, all parts of that answer choice need to be correct. We can go through each option and see if part 1 and 2 of each are actually correct and eliminate.

Option A: Boldface 1 - Curator is not arguing that reconstructions are identical. Eliminate.
Option B: Boldface 1 - not evidence, this is a claim. Eliminate.
Option C: Boldface 1 - Curator is not making an assumption for this side here. Eliminate.
Option D: Boldface 1 - This is a claim that the curator is challenging, yes. Boldface 2 - it's not the curator's conclusion. Eliminate.
Option E: Boldface 1 - Correct (it's the same as Option D, see above for explanation). Boldface 2 - This is correct. Boldface 2 is further elaboration for the preceding sentence, which is the curator's conclusion.

Therefore E is the answer.
User avatar
KunchiGoks
Joined: 09 Jan 2025
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
20
 [1]
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 20
Kudos: 20
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Answer Choice: E

Strategy: In boldface questions, we can first identify any pivot word. Here, "however" marks a clear contrast between two opposing positions. Typically, the text before "however" sets up one position, while the text after reflects the contrasting view, in this case, the museum curator's conclusion/justification.

First boldface: Appears before "however" and provides a reason supporting the historians' view that reconstructed buildings are worthy of admiration. This corresponds to (E) supports the position that the curator opposes.

Second boldface: Follows "however" and expresses the curator's evaluative conclusion/justification about authenticity, which challenges the historians' position. This corresponds to (E) elaborates the justification for the curator's conclusion.
 1   2   3   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
501 posts
358 posts