Last visit was: 20 Apr 2026, 15:54 It is currently 20 Apr 2026, 15:54
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,701
Own Kudos:
810,274
 [2]
Given Kudos: 105,779
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,701
Kudos: 810,274
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,701
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,779
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,701
Kudos: 810,274
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
dolortempore
Joined: 15 Aug 2025
Last visit: 22 Jan 2026
Posts: 47
Own Kudos:
44
 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
Posts: 47
Kudos: 44
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
ManifestDreamMBA
Joined: 17 Sep 2024
Last visit: 21 Feb 2026
Posts: 1,387
Own Kudos:
897
 [1]
Given Kudos: 243
Posts: 1,387
Kudos: 897
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A - This suggests that country X has not given ample time to the hikes to show effects, given it has been just 1 yr. Waiting for some more time furthers the case. Correct
B - Moderation in these sectors could be caused by reasons other then inflation. This is not directly related
C - This is not dependent on customer understanding of these dynamics. Irrelevant
D - the reason was business raising price is irrelevant
E - this is kind of a weakener. It suggests stimulus programs might not be countering the effect of the hike
Bunuel
Economist: In response to prolonged inflationary pressure, several central banks have raised interest rates to their highest levels in over a decade. The intended effect is to curb inflation by reducing consumer demand. However, in Country X, core inflation has remained stubbornly high despite multiple rate hikes over the past year. Some policymakers now argue that raising rates further will have no effect. But that conclusion may be premature. Unlike in prior tightening cycles, consumers in Country X have unusually high cash reserves due to recent fiscal stimulus programs. Once those excess savings are depleted, current interest rates may begin to exert a stronger downward influence on inflation.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the economist’s argument?

A. In previous decades, interest rate hikes took up to 18 months to fully impact inflation, particularly in economies where household savings were low.

B. Inflation in Country X has recently shown signs of moderating in sectors unrelated to consumer demand, such as energy and commodities.

C. Surveys indicate that many consumers in Country X do not fully understand how interest rate changes affect their day-to-day expenses.

D. Businesses in Country X have begun raising prices primarily in response to wage pressures rather than increased demand.

E. Central banks in countries without recent stimulus programs have also struggled to bring down inflation through interest rate increases.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
User avatar
Archit3110
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 8,625
Own Kudos:
5,190
 [1]
Given Kudos: 243
Status:You learn more from failure than from success.
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Marketing
GMAT Focus 1: 545 Q79 V79 DI73
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q83 V82 DI81
GPA: 4
WE:Marketing (Energy)
Products:
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q83 V82 DI81
Posts: 8,625
Kudos: 5,190
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Economist: In response to prolonged inflationary pressure, several central banks have raised interest rates to their highest levels in over a decade. The intended effect is to curb inflation by reducing consumer demand. However, in Country X, core inflation has remained stubbornly high despite multiple rate hikes over the past year. Some policymakers now argue that raising rates further will have no effect. But that conclusion may be premature. Unlike in prior tightening cycles, consumers in Country X have unusually high cash reserves due to recent fiscal stimulus programs. Once those excess savings are depleted, current interest rates may begin to exert a stronger downward influence on inflation.


so as to counter rising inflation , central banks have raised interest rates .. target is to reduce consumer demand..
policymakers are calling raising rates no effect and a a failure , which is to premature to conclude as
consumers in country X have high cash reserves so until it does not deplete the impact will not come into place of high interest rate..

strengthen the conclusion


Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the economist’s argument?

A. In previous decades, interest rate hikes took up to 18 months to fully impact inflation, particularly in economies where household savings were low.


this strengthens the conclusion, citing reason that if it took 18 months to impact in economy with low savings so in country with high cash reserve household would take more time ; correct option


B. Inflation in Country X has recently shown signs of moderating in sectors unrelated to consumer demand, such as energy and commodities.

consumer demands is what is discussed ; not relevant to argument


C. Surveys indicate that many consumers in Country X do not fully understand how interest rate changes affect their day-to-day expenses.

this does not strengthen the conclusion of the argument


D. Businesses in Country X have begun raising prices primarily in response to wage pressures rather than increased demand.

this weakens the conclusion of the argument


E. Central banks in countries without recent stimulus programs have also struggled to bring down inflation through interest rate increases.
this does not support the argument ..

OPTION A is correct
User avatar
Xdsa
Joined: 07 Jul 2025
Last visit: 19 Apr 2026
Posts: 57
Own Kudos:
45
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 57
Kudos: 45
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
option A is the answer
as it says that the interest rate hikes took 18 months to reduce inflation in economies where the house hold saving is low this is in line with argument in passage that the excess savings are depleted the interest rate will reduce inflation
User avatar
batman10bigman
Joined: 23 Apr 2025
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
38
 [1]
Given Kudos: 11
Products:
Posts: 44
Kudos: 38
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Economist: In response to prolonged inflationary pressure, several central banks have raised interest rates to their highest levels in over a decade. The intended effect is to curb inflation by reducing consumer demand. However, in Country X, core inflation has remained stubbornly high despite multiple rate hikes over the past year. Some policymakers now argue that raising rates further will have no effect. But that conclusion may be premature. Unlike in prior tightening cycles, consumers in Country X have unusually high cash reserves due to recent fiscal stimulus programs. Once those excess savings are depleted, current interest rates may begin to exert a stronger downward influence on inflation.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the economist’s argument?

A. In previous decades, interest rate hikes took up to 18 months to fully impact inflation, particularly in economies where household savings were low.

B. Inflation in Country X has recently shown signs of moderating in sectors unrelated to consumer demand, such as energy and commodities.

C. Surveys indicate that many consumers in Country X do not fully understand how interest rate changes affect their day-to-day expenses.

D. Businesses in Country X have begun raising prices primarily in response to wage pressures rather than increased demand.

E. Central banks in countries without recent stimulus programs have also struggled to bring down inflation through interest rate increases.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
Economists point: Rate hikes can work, but in Country X the effect is delayed because consumers are still spending down unusually high cash reserves, once those savings run out, todays rates should bite more.

A: This options strengthens this by adding a known mechanism for delay: in past cycles, hikes often took months to hit inflation, especially when household savings were low so its plausible that country X just hasn't reached the "savings depleted" stage yet

B weakens/irrelevant: Falling energy/commodities isn't evidence that demand driven inflation will fall later due to depleted savings

C irrelevant: misunderstanding rates doesn't support the "once savings run out, rates will work" claim

D weakens: if inflation is wage-driven (cost-push), rate hikes may matter less, undercutting the economist

E weakens: suggests rate hikes aren't working even without the "excess savings" explanation

Option A
User avatar
rahumangal
Joined: 20 Nov 2022
Last visit: 07 Apr 2026
Posts: 71
Own Kudos:
66
 [1]
Given Kudos: 316
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Real Estate
GPA: 3.99
WE:Engineering (Technology)
Products:
Posts: 71
Kudos: 66
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Economist: In response to prolonged inflationary pressure, several central banks have raised interest rates to their highest levels in over a decade. The intended effect is to curb inflation by reducing consumer demand. However, in Country X, core inflation has remained stubbornly high despite multiple rate hikes over the past year. Some policymakers now argue that raising rates further will have no effect. But that conclusion may be premature. Unlike in prior tightening cycles, consumers in Country X have unusually high cash reserves due to recent fiscal stimulus programs. Once those excess savings are depleted, current interest rates may begin to exert a stronger downward influence on inflation.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the economist’s argument?

A. In previous decades, interest rate hikes took up to 18 months to fully impact inflation, particularly in economies where household savings were low.

B. Inflation in Country X has recently shown signs of moderating in sectors unrelated to consumer demand, such as energy and commodities.

C. Surveys indicate that many consumers in Country X do not fully understand how interest rate changes affect their day-to-day expenses.

D. Businesses in Country X have begun raising prices primarily in response to wage pressures rather than increased demand.

E. Central banks in countries without recent stimulus programs have also struggled to bring down inflation through interest rate increases.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
Conclusion- But that conclusion(aising rates further will have no effect) may be premature

A-If the savings were low then time taken to impact inflation was 18 months, then if savings are more it might take longer time to impact inflation, supports the conclusion - Correct
B-Sectors unrelated to consumer demand is none of our concern, since it has no effect of rate hikes -Irrelevant
C-Whether consumers understand how rate change affect them or not is none of our concern- Irrelevant
D-Rates have increased due to wage pressure and not due to high inflation, and it doesn't say whether it will have any effect on high inflation or not-Out
E-it talks about countries where rate hikes have proved ineffective in reducing inflation, that actually weakens our argument-Out
User avatar
vasu1104
Joined: 10 Feb 2023
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 386
Own Kudos:
230
 [1]
Given Kudos: 664
Location: Canada
Products:
Posts: 386
Kudos: 230
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
conclusion= some policymakers arguments may be premature.
reason-several banks raised interest to highest in over a decade.
effect is to curb consumer demand.
country X inflation remained high despite multiple rates hike.
consumers in X have high cash reserve.
once savings are depleted, interest rates begin to influence inflation.

A yup. if despite low saving it took some time to show effect then they are on right track
B this rather weakens
C. consumers understanding not relevant.
D reason for price increase is not concern
E. no impact at all.
Bunuel
Economist: In response to prolonged inflationary pressure, several central banks have raised interest rates to their highest levels in over a decade. The intended effect is to curb inflation by reducing consumer demand. However, in Country X, core inflation has remained stubbornly high despite multiple rate hikes over the past year. Some policymakers now argue that raising rates further will have no effect. But that conclusion may be premature. Unlike in prior tightening cycles, consumers in Country X have unusually high cash reserves due to recent fiscal stimulus programs. Once those excess savings are depleted, current interest rates may begin to exert a stronger downward influence on inflation.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the economist’s argument?

A. In previous decades, interest rate hikes took up to 18 months to fully impact inflation, particularly in economies where household savings were low.

B. Inflation in Country X has recently shown signs of moderating in sectors unrelated to consumer demand, such as energy and commodities.

C. Surveys indicate that many consumers in Country X do not fully understand how interest rate changes affect their day-to-day expenses.

D. Businesses in Country X have begun raising prices primarily in response to wage pressures rather than increased demand.

E. Central banks in countries without recent stimulus programs have also struggled to bring down inflation through interest rate increases.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
User avatar
AviNFC
Joined: 31 May 2023
Last visit: 10 Apr 2026
Posts: 306
Own Kudos:
366
 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 306
Kudos: 366
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. In previous decades, interest rate hikes took up to 18 months to fully impact inflation, particularly in economies where household savings were low. CORRECT. This shows once savings reduces, effect will be seen with time.

B. Inflation in Country X has recently shown signs of moderating in sectors unrelated to consumer demand, such as energy and commodities. Result in unrelated sector is irrelevant. Effect in consumer demand is under relevant.

C. Surveys indicate that many consumers in Country X do not fully understand how interest rate changes affect their day-to-day expenses. This weakens saying that further interest change will not have any effect

D. Businesses in Country X have begun raising prices primarily in response to wage pressures rather than increased demand. This supports the explanation of cash reserve only. This doesn't help explain that inflation will reduce

E. Central banks in countries without recent stimulus programs have also struggled to bring down inflation through interest rate increases. This raises doubt on the explanation of cash reserve & hence to the proposal that interest rate hike be sustained.

Ans A
User avatar
Ayeka
Joined: 26 May 2024
Last visit: 18 Apr 2026
Posts: 528
Own Kudos:
402
 [1]
Given Kudos: 158
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q82 V83 DI80
GPA: 4.2
Schools: ISB
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q82 V83 DI80
Posts: 528
Kudos: 402
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The argument says that the inflation is high despite the rate hikes. But people in country X have extra saving, so they keep spending. Once those savings run out the current high interest rate should start working to lower the inflation. To make this argument stronger, we need to show that interest rates and saving levels are linked in a way that explains the current delay.

A. In previous decades, interest rate hikes took up to 18 months to fully impact inflation, particularly in economics where household savings were low. This shows a historical precedent that rate hikes take a long time to work even when savings are low. If it takes that long when people habe less money then it logically follows that the process would take even longer when people have high level savings.

A
User avatar
sriharsha4444
Joined: 06 Jun 2018
Last visit: 05 Mar 2026
Posts: 125
Own Kudos:
84
 [1]
Given Kudos: 803
Posts: 125
Kudos: 84
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Conclusion: once the excessive savings are depleted, current interest rates may lead to decrease in inflation.


A. Correct. Giving prior example where it took 18 months for interest rates to fully impact inflation. Since already a year passed, this is indicating that in the next 6 months, interest rates will have impact on the inflation.
B. Wrong. Statement is saying, inflation can go down without consumer demand going down. This is giving alter reason.
C. Wrong. Whether consumers understand fully or partially or nothing about how interest rate to inflation mechanism works has no impact on the argument
D. Wrong. Reasons for inflation is not the point of the question. Whether the solution will have the desired impact or not.
E. Wrong. Weakener. It is giving examples of cases where similar mechanism didn't work.


Ans: Option A
User avatar
chasing725
Joined: 22 Jun 2025
Last visit: 13 Jan 2026
Posts: 176
Own Kudos:
173
 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
Location: United States (OR)
Schools: Stanford
Schools: Stanford
Posts: 176
Kudos: 173
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Economist: In response to prolonged inflationary pressure, several central banks have raised interest rates to their highest levels in over a decade. The intended effect is to curb inflation by reducing consumer demand. However, in Country X, core inflation has remained stubbornly high despite multiple rate hikes over the past year. Some policymakers now argue that raising rates further will have no effect. But that conclusion may be premature. Unlike in prior tightening cycles, consumers in Country X have unusually high cash reserves due to recent fiscal stimulus programs. Once those excess savings are depleted, current interest rates may begin to exert a stronger downward influence on inflation.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the economist’s argument?

A. In previous decades, interest rate hikes took up to 18 months to fully impact inflation, particularly in economies where household savings were low.

B. Inflation in Country X has recently shown signs of moderating in sectors unrelated to consumer demand, such as energy and commodities.

C. Surveys indicate that many consumers in Country X do not fully understand how interest rate changes affect their day-to-day expenses.

D. Businesses in Country X have begun raising prices primarily in response to wage pressures rather than increased demand.

E. Central banks in countries without recent stimulus programs have also struggled to bring down inflation through interest rate increases.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more

A. Correct : This option tells us the effects of rate hikes do take time, and the effect may not be seen immeditately. Hence, we can keep this option.

B. Incorrect : Doesn't help strengthen the conclusion. We are intrested only in consumer demand sectors.

C. Incorrect : Out of scope. The passage doesn't highlight the need to understand the effect.

D. Incorrect : Irrelevant to the conclusion of the arugment. We have to find an option that strengthens that in long term the new interest rates will help curb inflation.

E. This weakens the conclusion. Eliminate E.

Option A
User avatar
sitrem
Joined: 19 Nov 2025
Last visit: 24 Feb 2026
Posts: 91
Own Kudos:
84
 [1]
Given Kudos: 238
Posts: 91
Kudos: 84
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Answer A

A. correct. This option supports the economist key point which is the rate increases can take a long time to affect inflation.
B. incorrect. This explains inflation changes in areas which are not driven by the demand, this does not support the court idea that rates will eventually decrease in inflation when savings run out.
C. Incorrect. This option weekends, the link between the increase rates and the reduced demand because if consumers don't understand how rates work, changing the rates will not change their behaviour.
D. incorrect. If rising wages are driving inflation higher interest rates will be less effective.
E. incorrect. If countries without access savings also struggle to car inflation with increased rates, then high savings in X may not explain the delay.
User avatar
flippedeclipse
Joined: 26 Apr 2025
Last visit: 13 Apr 2026
Posts: 105
Own Kudos:
73
 [1]
Given Kudos: 37
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q80 V87 DI80
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q80 V87 DI80
Posts: 105
Kudos: 73
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Economist: In response to prolonged inflationary pressure, several central banks have raised interest rates to their highest levels in over a decade. The intended effect is to curb inflation by reducing consumer demand. However, in Country X, core inflation has remained stubbornly high despite multiple rate hikes over the past year. Some policymakers now argue that raising rates further will have no effect. But that conclusion may be premature. Unlike in prior tightening cycles, consumers in Country X have unusually high cash reserves due to recent fiscal stimulus programs. Once those excess savings are depleted, current interest rates may begin to exert a stronger downward influence on inflation.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the economist’s argument?

A. In previous decades, interest rate hikes took up to 18 months to fully impact inflation, particularly in economies where household savings were low.

B. Inflation in Country X has recently shown signs of moderating in sectors unrelated to consumer demand, such as energy and commodities.

C. Surveys indicate that many consumers in Country X do not fully understand how interest rate changes affect their day-to-day expenses.

D. Businesses in Country X have begun raising prices primarily in response to wage pressures rather than increased demand.

E. Central banks in countries without recent stimulus programs have also struggled to bring down inflation through interest rate increases.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more

Going through sentence by sentence to understand what the passage is saying, we get -
S1&2: Inflation is high, central banks raised interest rates a year ago, this should curb inflation.
S3&4: This isn't working in Country X, where inflation is staying high, policymakers saying raising rates is useless.
S5&6: Counters previous argument, it's working, people just have a lot of cash and need to wait until that depletes.
S7: After cash reserves deplete, inflation will therefore go down.

We need to strengthen this argument - the assumption is that when cash reserves empty inflation will go down, so we need to strengthen that.

Option A: This says that it takes 1.5 years to see the effect, and that's in countries that didn't have big cash reserves. This strengthens because it's only been a year, and the cash reserve aspect will add even more time to it. Hold onto this.
Option B: Moderating in some sectors does not equal all sectors. Not a strong indicator of correlation with passage argument. Eliminate.
Option C: Consumers knowing how inflation works is irrelevant. Eliminate.
Option D: Businesses raising their prices is irrelevant to the hiking rates = lower inflation argument. Eliminate.
Option E: This weakens the argument and proves the counterpoint. Eliminate.

Thus A is our answer.
User avatar
pappal
Joined: 24 Nov 2022
Last visit: 17 Apr 2026
Posts: 314
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 94
Products:
Posts: 314
Kudos: 109
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
the argument can be interpreted as:
P1-due to inflation certain plan by central banks
P2-intended effect and How?
P3-no effect of the plan executed in past year
P4-some policy makers argue further execution will not have intended effect.
primary conclusion--P4 is premature thinking
P5- the consumers in country X have unusually high cash reserves due to some fiscal programs
main conclusion--once these savings are depleted, the plan may have the intended effect. so must continue.
strengthening question??
A. the effect of the plan in the economies which had low domestic savings, it took up to 18 months to curb the demand and get the intended effect, so in the economy under question it will not have the intended effect anywhere in nearby future --so doesn't strengthen
B. discusses moderating effect in sectors unrelated to consumer demand --so out of context
C. discusses non understanding of the plan by consumers.--not strengthens conclusion
D. Businesses in the country have begun to raise prices no matter of what so ever reason but will certainly help in depletion of the domestic savings so will help in the execution of the plan as discussed in the argument ---correct
E. it clearly opposes the conclusion as states that if banks struggled to curb down inflation even without the stimulus programs , so in the case under discussion the plan is certain a failure--out
so D
User avatar
Sriesh
Joined: 13 Apr 2025
Last visit: 19 Apr 2026
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
8
 [1]
Given Kudos: 7
Products:
Posts: 23
Kudos: 8
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Option A seems to be the most apt for this, we are given that previously when household savings were not as high as today's market, it still took interest hikes 18 months to account for inflation, and hence this time as the household savings are more than any previous year, it is logical to think it is going to take more than 18 months, and hence the delay is justified.
User avatar
AbhishekP220108
Joined: 04 Aug 2024
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 494
Own Kudos:
208
 [1]
Given Kudos: 135
GMAT Focus 1: 555 Q81 V78 DI74
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 555 Q81 V78 DI74
Posts: 494
Kudos: 208
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In My Opinion, the Answer is A

The argument is mainly focused on whether the raised interest rates will have their intended effect or not. Policymakers stated that there will be no effect. In response, the economist said it is premature to conclude that there will be no effect. He presents the reason why there may be an intended effect.

Now the question asks to support the economist's conclusion.

Any data or further added reason in relation to raised interest rates will be our answer.

A. Its a data about a past event which supports the probability of showing the intended effect. Keep
B. If the other sector showed some trend not driven by the consumer, then I don't think it would be relevant for the support. Eliminate
C. Consumer understanding is again irrelevant. eliminate
D. If the inflation is getting controlled because of high prices by business then it somehow weakens. Eliminate
E. This again weakens because it presents the scenario where the cash reserve is less, and still, there is no effect on inflation. eliminate
Bunuel
Economist: In response to prolonged inflationary pressure, several central banks have raised interest rates to their highest levels in over a decade. The intended effect is to curb inflation by reducing consumer demand. However, in Country X, core inflation has remained stubbornly high despite multiple rate hikes over the past year. Some policymakers now argue that raising rates further will have no effect. But that conclusion may be premature. Unlike in prior tightening cycles, consumers in Country X have unusually high cash reserves due to recent fiscal stimulus programs. Once those excess savings are depleted, current interest rates may begin to exert a stronger downward influence on inflation.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the economist’s argument?

A. In previous decades, interest rate hikes took up to 18 months to fully impact inflation, particularly in economies where household savings were low.

B. Inflation in Country X has recently shown signs of moderating in sectors unrelated to consumer demand, such as energy and commodities.

C. Surveys indicate that many consumers in Country X do not fully understand how interest rate changes affect their day-to-day expenses.

D. Businesses in Country X have begun raising prices primarily in response to wage pressures rather than increased demand.

E. Central banks in countries without recent stimulus programs have also struggled to bring down inflation through interest rate increases.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
User avatar
Brindac2
Joined: 14 Apr 2025
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 26
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 108
Location: United Arab Emirates
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT Focus 1: 535 Q72 V82 DI75
WE:Management Consulting (Accounting)
GMAT Focus 1: 535 Q72 V82 DI75
Posts: 26
Kudos: 16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
We need argument strengthener :

Argument : In country X, high interest rates has no effect on consumer demand because consumers have high cash reserves due to recent fiscal stimulus.

A. It took 18 months to fully impact inflation. Likely. but which country? Not mentioned. Wrong.
B. Inflation in X is moderating for non consumer related business. Very tricky. In actual world, this is one of the indicator but here it doesn't affect consumers so, Wrong.
C. Completely unrelated. Even if consumers don't understand interest rates, their behavior will change for demand of goods. Wrong.
D. Businesses have started rising prices due to wage pressures, not demand increase. That's a strengthener for sure. Wage pressure means people are demanding higher wages likely due to decreasing cash reserves and demand is not increasing. Correct.
E. Other central banks also struggles but that has nothing to do with X. So wrong.

Bunuel
Economist: In response to prolonged inflationary pressure, several central banks have raised interest rates to their highest levels in over a decade. The intended effect is to curb inflation by reducing consumer demand. However, in Country X, core inflation has remained stubbornly high despite multiple rate hikes over the past year. Some policymakers now argue that raising rates further will have no effect. But that conclusion may be premature. Unlike in prior tightening cycles, consumers in Country X have unusually high cash reserves due to recent fiscal stimulus programs. Once those excess savings are depleted, current interest rates may begin to exert a stronger downward influence on inflation.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the economist’s argument?
A. In previous decades, interest rate hikes took up to 18 months to fully impact inflation, particularly in economies where household savings were low.
B. Inflation in Country X has recently shown signs of moderating in sectors unrelated to consumer demand, such as energy and commodities.
C. Surveys indicate that many consumers in Country X do not fully understand how interest rate changes affect their day-to-day expenses.
D. Businesses in Country X have begun raising prices primarily in response to wage pressures rather than increased demand.
E. Central banks in countries without recent stimulus programs have also struggled to bring down inflation through interest rate increases.
User avatar
lkj123
Joined: 17 Jul 2025
Last visit: 06 Apr 2026
Posts: 33
Own Kudos:
Posts: 33
Kudos: 19
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Option A,
our main aim is to prove that the rate increase will be effective in curbing inflation. the option A, states that increase in rate will be effective after certain period of times in curbing inflation. Other options are not strengthning the passage conclusion
 1   2   3   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
494 posts
358 posts