Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 1612:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
You’re first to know: Save $200 on GMAT prep starting tomorrow, 4/13. Get 6 official practice tests and study with real questions. Be ready to save!
Apr 2212:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
26 Dec 2025, 09:00
Kudos
Bookmarks
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
40% (02:12) correct
60%
(02:20)
wrong
based on 161
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Over the past year, several customer service firms have adopted generative AI tools to automate client interactions. One firm, NexCom, whose customer base consists primarily of long-term enterprise clients, however, chose not to integrate such tools, citing concerns about response accuracy and brand tone. Despite this, NexCom’s customer satisfaction scores have remained stable, while some competitors serving a broader base of casual users have experienced a decline. Based on this outcome, NexCom’s executives argue that avoiding generative AI has preserved service quality and that the firm should continue relying solely on human representatives.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the executives’ conclusion?
A. Several firms that adopted generative AI tools saw increased response efficiency, though client sentiment about interaction quality was mixed.
B. Clients of competing firms who experienced declining satisfaction scores were more likely to be unfamiliar with the company’s support systems or interface.
C. NexCom’s human agents are better equipped than AI tools to handle the complex and nuanced concerns often raised by long-standing enterprise clients.
D. While NexCom’s clients reported stable satisfaction scores, they also expressed interest in features that AI tools could support, such as 24/7 assistance.
E. Some of NexCom’s competitors that experienced a drop in satisfaction also failed to retrain staff to adapt to the changes introduced by AI integration.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the executives’ conclusion?
A. Several firms that adopted generative AI tools saw increased response efficiency, though client sentiment about interaction quality was mixed.
B. Clients of competing firms who experienced declining satisfaction scores were more likely to be unfamiliar with the company’s support systems or interface.
C. NexCom’s human agents are better equipped than AI tools to handle the complex and nuanced concerns often raised by long-standing enterprise clients.
D. While NexCom’s clients reported stable satisfaction scores, they also expressed interest in features that AI tools could support, such as 24/7 assistance.
E. Some of NexCom’s competitors that experienced a drop in satisfaction also failed to retrain staff to adapt to the changes introduced by AI integration.
V40-26
26 Dec 2025, 10:00
Kudos
Bookmarks
Bunuel
GMAT Club Official Explanation:
A. Several firms that adopted generative AI tools saw increased response efficiency, though client sentiment about interaction quality was mixed.
This is basically saying, “AI made things faster, but people felt mixed about how good the experience was.” That’s not strong enough. NexCom’s argument isn’t about speed but it’s about maintaining service quality and satisfaction. Doesn’t really weaken their argument. Just adds neutral info.
B. Clients of competing firms who experienced declining satisfaction scores were more likely to be unfamiliar with the company’s support systems or interface.
This one hits the logic head-on. NexCom said: “Other companies used AI and their satisfaction scores dropped. So clearly AI is the problem.” But if those clients were casual users who didn’t know how to use the system properly, that could easily explain why satisfaction dropped. The issue might not be AI at all. This shows that the comparison isn’t fair. NexCom serves long-term clients who already understand the system. Other firms serve casual users. That difference, not AI, might explain the satisfaction gap. This directly undermines their argument.
C. NexCom’s human agents are better equipped than AI tools to handle the complex and nuanced concerns often raised by long-standing enterprise clients.
This actually supports NexCom’s point. If their human reps are better at dealing with tough or detailed issues, then it makes sense that avoiding AI helped them maintain service quality. This doesn’t weaken their conclusion. It reinforces it.
D. While NexCom’s clients reported stable satisfaction scores, they also expressed interest in features that AI tools could support, such as 24/7 assistance.
This says that while customers are currently satisfied, they might want AI-supported features in the future. That’s helpful to know, but it doesn’t prove that avoiding AI in the past was a mistake. It just raises a question about future strategy. It slightly weakens their long-term plan but doesn’t damage the reasoning behind their current approach.
E. Some of NexCom’s competitors that experienced a drop in satisfaction also failed to retrain staff to adapt to the changes introduced by AI integration.
This suggests that maybe the real problem wasn’t AI itself but poor execution. That casts a little doubt on the idea that AI causes poor service quality, but the key word here is “some.” It’s not enough to disprove the overall comparison. NexCom could still say, “Even if some companies messed up the rollout, we played it safe and it worked.” So this one weakens the argument only slightly.
General Discussion
26 Dec 2025, 10:09
Kudos
Bookmarks
Bunuel
A-If the interaction quality was mixed for firms that adapted ai tools,then we can't say whether the decision to stick to manual representative for NexCom is a good idea or not-Out
B-Talk about familiarity with company support and interface nothing about experience de to ai- Out
C-Gives a reason why Nexcom decision to stick to old ways is good, supports the conclusion-Out
D-What there other interests are none of our concern-Out
D-Gives an alternate reason as to understand why ai interaction is leading to decline in satisfaction , its might be due to lack of skills of the staff and not the ai- Correct
