swbluedevil
I've been getting 770, 780 on the paper tests- I also think they are too easy. But, it would be sweeet if I could score that high on the real test.
I agree. So far I've taken 6 papers: 690, 750, 730, 720, 760, 740, 740.
The math is way too easy. The verbal is solid though. I think the verbal is excellent practice b/c for the CR's and SC's it gives you less time than on the computer test. On the CAT you can afford around 2min per CR, but on the paper u get about 1min 30 sec.
One thing I highly reccomend for the paper tests is to treat it like a CAT as best as you can.
First and foremost always go by the time thats given for the paper tests.
Second DO NOT SKIP over answers and go back to them. YOU cannot do this during the test.
DO NOT leave questions unanswered, while this doesnt increase your score it doesnt hurt it either. You don't have this option on the real test so dont use it on the papers!!!
Personally after taking the paper tests I really have come to dislike the CAT's. Partly because I can do much better on the paper's, but more because I think its a more realistic test.
GMAC can defend its adaptive format all it wants, but I still feel this system is flawed.
If you make some silly mistakes, then your score on the CAT will take a nose dive. Is this really predictive of your score? No. It does measure your attention to detail... maybe. I dunno, this is all personal opinion here so don't jump all over me.