SuryaNouliGMAT
may i know is this a vice-versa rule i.e , when asked to find the greatest possible value of the smallest integer in the set, do we need to maximize the greater value of the set ?
Thanks in advance.
EMPOWERgmatRichC
Hi Pratyaksh2791,
This question asks us to find the greatest possible number that could be in this set. Since 25 is the MEDIAN of the group of 15 INTEGERS, we know that 7 integers are greater than 25 and 7 integers are less than 25. We're told that the largest integer is exactly 25 more than the smallest integer, so to maximize the biggest value, we also have to maximize the smallest value. Since we're restricted to INTEGERS, the only way to get that maximum result is if the 7 integers that are less than 25 are CONSECUTIVE integers:
24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19 and 18
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Hi SuryaNouliGMAT,
When a GMAT question asks you to consider a 'set' of numbers, you have to pay careful attention to the information that you're given about the set. In this prompt, we're told that the RANGE = 25 which means something really specific (re: the largest number is "25 more" than the smallest number - so if you change one of those two numbers, then you have to change the other as well). With this question, to maximize one number, you also have to maximize the other.
In other situations, to make the smallest number as big as possible, you have to make the other numbers as SMALL as possible. For example:
"The sum of 5 distinct integers is 100. What is the maximum possible value of the smallest number in this group?"
Here, we know that the 5 integers are DIFFERENT and that the sum of the integers is 100. To maximize the smallest value, we have to make the other 4 integers as small as possible (while still making sure that they are each bigger than the smallest integer). That group would be 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22.
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich