Not supportive of a robot run world... but going to have to agree with the VerbalBot..(joking).. think this problem highlights a useful CR must-be-true example. The problem highlights the conditional reasoning really well.
Stimulus:
A society in which there are many crimes, such as thefts and murders, should not be called "lawless" That is an abuse of the meaning of words. As a suffix "less "means "without" so "lawless" means "without laws." However, a society that has no laws has no crimes, because no laws can be broken. A lawless society would, therefore, be a crimeless society. So what some have termed a lawless society should actually be called "crimeful".
So my conditional reasoning isn't super strong so bear with me.. what I took away from reading the stimulus is:
"IF" a society has NO laws, then it has NO crimes... (see: "However, a society that has no laws has no crimes, because no laws can be broken."
As a result the diagram I drew is:
No laws -> No Crimes; however an important distinction I made is that the negation of No laws is not ALL laws, it is SOME laws
So when reviewing the answer choices I saw that choice D is a contrapositive of the conditional reasoning highlighted in my diagram.
Question Stem:
If the statements in the passage are true, which one of the following must also be true?
Answer Choices & Reasoning:
(A) A society that has laws has crimes.
This answer choice is not a contrapositive, instead it is just wrong and invalid. It is simply a mistaken negation
(B) A society that has no crimes has no laws.
This answer choice is mistaken reversal, reversing the conditional reasoning without negating it
(C) A society that has many laws has many crimes.
Same as answer choice A, "many" is not a negation of "no laws"
(D) A society that has some crimes has some laws.
This is correct. "Some" is a negation of none or in this case "no laws"
(E) A society that has many crimes has many laws
This answer choice is a mistaken reversal with a mistaken negation so in summary an incorrect contrapositive...
Let me know if anyone disagrees or has any questions
Cheers!