Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Jun 0408:30 AM PDT
-09:30 AM PDT
For most test takers, Data Insights is the most challenging section on the GMAT, with test takers scoring several points lower on average on DI than on Quant or Verbal and completing the section with less time to spare.
May 2910:00 AM IST
-11:00 PM IST
Start your journey with a fully customized action plan and work with a dedicated mentor to achieve a 735+ score.- Jun 03
08:30 AM PDT
-09:30 AM PDT
In Episode 7 of our GMAT Ninja CR series, we are rounding up the oddballs, the misfits, and the format-benders: EXCEPT, Fill-In-The-Blanks, and other unusual Critical Reasoning question types. When you see a question that ends with a literal blank line - Jun 10
06:00 AM PDT
-06:15 PM PDT
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..
10 Jan 2013, 12:36
Kudos
Bookmarks
(Sorry if this in the wrong secton, still new here and not sure where else this would go)
I know the rules for factoring, but was wondering if there is a method/trick to handling problems where the numbers are large and obscure. For example, \(x^2+16x-1536\)
Obviously I knew the seperation of the two factors in their absolute form would be 16. I eventually was able to work my way to the answer of 32, -48 but not without a tedious process of picking a starting number (40) and working my way toward the number set.
The 16/1536 relation is not intuitive, is there a trick to arriving at 32,-48 more quickly?
Thanks
I know the rules for factoring, but was wondering if there is a method/trick to handling problems where the numbers are large and obscure. For example, \(x^2+16x-1536\)
Obviously I knew the seperation of the two factors in their absolute form would be 16. I eventually was able to work my way to the answer of 32, -48 but not without a tedious process of picking a starting number (40) and working my way toward the number set.
The 16/1536 relation is not intuitive, is there a trick to arriving at 32,-48 more quickly?
Thanks
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Quantitative Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
jumsumtak
Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Last visit: 14 Jun 2023
Posts: 1,092
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 479
Concentration: Healthcare, Strategy
Schools: Duke '16 (M)
10 Jan 2013, 13:25
Kudos
Bookmarks
Please check this out:
quick-factoring-question-145290.html
to add, you won't see absurd numbers on the test.
hope this helps.
quick-factoring-question-145290.html
to add, you won't see absurd numbers on the test.
hope this helps.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Quantitative Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
