Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 13:05 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 13:05
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
rahulsn84
Joined: 09 Jun 2012
Last visit: 29 Dec 2018
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
54
 [6]
Given Kudos: 25
Posts: 11
Kudos: 54
 [6]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
DonQuixote
Joined: 25 Jun 2012
Last visit: 11 Feb 2013
Posts: 49
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 49
Kudos: 45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
arnivorous
Joined: 07 Jul 2012
Last visit: 22 Oct 2012
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 10
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
dabral
User avatar
Tutor
Joined: 19 Apr 2009
Last visit: 29 Nov 2024
Posts: 557
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 19
Affiliations: GMATQuantum
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 557
Kudos: 666
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I want to make a comment that as far as the GMAT is concerned, these divisibility rules are completely irrelevant. Now if you would like to have fun with divisibility, then that is a different story. Almost all of the divisions on the GMAT are very basic, and the goal of the test writers is not to test a student's ability to crunch numbers rapidly.

Cheers,
Dabral
User avatar
mindmind
Joined: 23 May 2012
Last visit: 09 Jul 2013
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 11
Posts: 23
Kudos: 114
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dabral
I want to make a comment that as far as the GMAT is concerned, these divisibility rules are completely irrelevant. Now if you would like to have fun with divisibility, then that is a different story. Almost all of the divisions on the GMAT are very basic, and the goal of the test writers is not to test a student's ability to crunch numbers rapidly.

Cheers,
Dabral
I agree to this..
These divisibility tests may be useful in India's CAT exam but not for GMAT
avatar
aparna78
Joined: 02 Jul 2013
Last visit: 02 Jul 2013
Posts: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
while finding check multiplier, especially in case of 17, i think it is not tens digit+1 but apart from last digit remaining number+1
eg : 17 X 7 = 119 so check multiplier is 11+1=12
avatar
Shrinet
Joined: 29 May 2014
Last visit: 29 May 2014
Posts: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My friend this trick isn't working for 17.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
farful
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 24 Nov 2020
Posts: 412
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 155
Status:Alum
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 730 Q52 V37
GMAT 1: 730 Q52 V37
Posts: 412
Kudos: 413
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DonQuixote
That's pretty interesting. Does the book also say how exactly this works? What are the properties of the numbers that allow this system to be applied?

Separate the last digit from the rest of the number.
Let x be the units digit, and let y be the rest of the number.

So for any number N, N = 10y+x.

Using rahulsn84's method, we say that N should be divisible by prime p if y+Mx is divisible by p, where M is some 'check multiplier'.

10y + x = y + Mx
10y + x = 10y + 10Mx
x = 10Mx
0 = 10Mx - x
0 = x(10M - 1)

Now the question is, is x(10M - 1) divisible by p? We have defined the check multiplier such that 10M - 1 is divisible by p. So yes, p|(10M - 1).

Check multiplier for 7 is 5. 10*5 - 1 = 49, which is 7*7.
Check multiplier for 13 is 4. 10*4 - 1 = 39, which is 13*3.
Check multiplier for 17 is 12. 10*12 - 1 = 119, which is 17*7.
Check multiplier for 19 is 2. 10*2 - 1 = 19, which is 19*1.
Check multiplier for 23 is 7. 23*4 - 1 = 69, which is 23*3.
etc.

This works for all primes.

You can simplify (or complicate, depending on how you see things) this method by also realizing that you don't things to end in 9, but ending it with 1 works as well.

For example, for p = 17, instead of using a check multiplier of 12, we can use a check multiplier of 5. 17*3 = 51 = 10*5 + 1. In this case, instead of adding Mx, we just need to subtract Mx. That is, 10y + x = y - Mx. Doing the algebra, we get x(10M + 1) = 0.

But yes, as so many others pointed out, this will not be on the GMAT.
User avatar
JimGMATAnswers
Joined: 16 Jan 2013
Last visit: 19 Feb 2016
Posts: 177
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Status:Helping People Ace the GMAT
Affiliations: GMAT Answers
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V46
GPA: 3.1
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V46
Posts: 177
Kudos: 89
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I would NEVER recommend using this technique - it just isn't relevant to the GMAT. Work on mental math techniques over this.

Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Quantitative Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!