Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Two bowlers are practicing to hit a wicket over two sessions.
In the first session, over 100 attempts, bowler A managed to hit the wicket 60 times, while bowler B managed to hit it 90 times.
In the second session, Bowler A managed to hit the wicket only once out of 10 times while bowler B managed to hit it 300 times out of 1000.
You have to tell their respective accuracies considering both sessions together ? Also, who is more accurate in session 1 and who is more accurate in session 2 as well as you have to tell who is more accurate over both the sessions ?
My approach was :
First session : Bowler A = 6/10 Bowler B = 9/10
Second session: Bowler A = 1/10 Bowler B = 3/10
I am not sure how to proceed for both the sessions ?
Can someone please explain. I am a beginner in P&C.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
You cannot reduce the fractions because you need to take into account the amount of attempts the bowler took. To find their overall accuracy for both sessions combined, you need to take the total # of wickets A hit and divide by the total # of attempts that A took.
Bowler A
Accuracy for both sessions = 60+1 / 100+10 = 61/110
Bowler B
accuracy for both sessions = 90+300 / 100+1000 = 390/1100
Two bowlers are practicing to hit a wicket over two sessions.
In the first session, over 100 attempts, bowler A managed to hit the wicket 60 times, while bowler B managed to hit it 90 times.
In the second session, Bowler A managed to hit the wicket only once out of 10 times while bowler B managed to hit it 300 times out of 1000.
You have to tell their respective accuracies considering both sessions together ? Also, who is more accurate in session 1 and who is more accurate in session 2 as well as you have to tell who is more accurate over both the sessions ?
My approach was :
First session : Bowler A = 6/10 Bowler B = 9/10
Second session: Bowler A = 1/10 Bowler B = 3/10
I am not sure how to proceed for both the sessions ?
Can someone please explain. I am a beginner in P&C.
Show more
What's the actual question here? It sounds like a very clear illustration of Simpson's Paradox, which is a very neat principle and may be the answer to an Explain Critical Reasoning question, but it doesn't look to be formatted as I'd expect from a GMAT math question.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.