Hey, looking at the answers provided, they are very helpful, but also quite technical. The approach I figured out to hack my way through the problem is:
1- We know they start at the same time and Car A then gets before to NY. So Car A is FASTER. This, in turn, implies the meeting point is closer to NY than to Boston.
2 - Since the meeting point is closer to NY, we have that 40min+40min<CAR A total journey< 40 min + 90 min. 1h20<CAR A total journey<2h10. This is the case since 2.1. The meeting point is further from Boston, so at least it took Car A 40 min to do Boston - Meeting Point & 2.2. Car A could not have taken longer than Car B to do Boston - Meeting Point.
ONLY possible answer is D. NO further computations required, just logic!
Bluelagoon
Two cars A and B start from Boston and New York respectively simultaneously and travel towards each other at constant speeds along the same route. After meeting at a point between Boston and New York the two cars A and B proceed to their respective destinations of New York and Boston. Car A reaches New York 40 minutes after the two cars have met and Car B reaches Boston 90 minutes after they have met. How long did Car A take to cover the distance between Boston and New York?
A. 1 hour
B. 1 hour 10 minutes
C. 2 hours 30 minutes
D. 1 hour 40 minutes
E. 2 hours 10 minutes