Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 23:36 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 23:36
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
   1   2   3   4   5   6   
User avatar
axl_oz
User avatar
Joined: 01 Feb 2005
Last visit: 14 Dec 2010
Posts: 159
Own Kudos:
468
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 159
Kudos: 468
(Un) Scientific analysis of gmatprep 09 Jun 2008, 08:19
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I gave my GMATPREP exam and I was horribly timing myself....!!!!!!!!!!!! I had to guess the last 11 questions :roll: :roll: in quant of which I got 2 right and the remaining wrong... My strike rate in the first 12 questions was 9 (correct and 2 wrong).
I ended up with a score of 45 on Quant. Verbal is a whole different story!!!!!!!!!!!!! (let's not go there)
User avatar
mbawaters
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jan 2008
Last visit: 12 Sep 2010
Posts: 145
Own Kudos:
359
Posts: 145
Kudos: 359
(Un) Scientific analysis of gmatprep 13 Jun 2008, 07:20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Took the GPrep2 yesterday, I got 39 in verbal after 8 mistakes. I have seen much better scores after 8 wrong but I guess here I had 3 wrong in a row in the first 8.

My take, yes first 5-10 do have more weight!
avatar
oustone85
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2008
Last visit: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 24
Own Kudos:
1
Posts: 24
Kudos: 1
(Un) Scientific analysis of gmatprep 13 Jun 2008, 08:59
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mbawaters
Took the GPrep2 yesterday, I got 39 in verbal after 8 mistakes. I have seen much better scores after 8 wrong but I guess here I had 3 wrong in a row in the first 8.

My take, yes first 5-10 do have more weight!
Show more

I definitely agree. I took the GPrep1 a few nights ago and got a 44 in verbal after missing 7 questions. Only missed one out of the first 8. However, I did miss 3 out of the last 7, so that hurt some. But evidently not as much as missing them at the start hurt you.
avatar
Virflo
avatar
Joined: 07 Apr 2008
Last visit: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 75
Own Kudos:
19
Posts: 75
Kudos: 19
(Un) Scientific analysis of gmatprep 22 Jun 2008, 07:12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Wow, great analysis bsd!! +1

I guess it all makes sense. Now, I've been told that for RC, the questions are not adaptative. From what I understood, you are given a text with a set of questions based on the level of SC and CR questions you've answered before the RC (this would explain why you never start off with RC).

But then within the RC, the questions do not change. So whether or not you correctly answer your first RC question, the second question will be the same. This is what I've been told and having done PowerPrep 1 and 2 three times, I think it might be true :?
What do you all think?

If this is true, it would explain why in your experiment, when you answered only the RC questions correctly, you got a worse score than when answering SC or CR alone. :wink:

Keep posting your findings!!
User avatar
subarao
User avatar
Joined: 11 Apr 2008
Last visit: 11 Aug 2009
Posts: 169
Own Kudos:
21
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 169
Kudos: 21
(Un) Scientific analysis of gmatprep 24 Aug 2008, 18:28
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Awesome posts by bsd_lover and suyashjhawar.
kudos to both

But I think the algorithm in real test must be more complicated than what we see on GMATprep.
User avatar
IanStewart
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,145
Own Kudos:
10,989
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,145
Kudos: 10,989
 [1]
(Un) Scientific analysis of gmatprep 25 Aug 2008, 12:26
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
There is a danger in drawing conclusions from a small sample size. I agree with Kevin that your Quant performance will have no effect at all on the questions you see in the Verbal section- the test would be unfairly biased if it did- and I expect what bsd noticed was just coincidence.

It is also untrue that SC questions are 'worth more' than CR questions, or vice versa, though I do agree that it's easier to improve on SC than on CR, so it is a good area to focus on during preparation for the test. I do suspect virflo is right in saying that RC questions come in batches- with one passage, some questions will be easier than others, though certainly some RC sets will be harder overall than other RC sets. As a consequence, it may be true that some RC questions are less important than others- those that are far from your ability level.

I do not agree at all with bsd's conclusion about the first ten questions, and take issue with the methodology. If you guess at the first 10 questions, and answer 2 correctly, that is an absolutely horrific performance. That's exactly how well you'd expect a ham sandwich to do on the first ten questions, by guessing. Since you're more than a quarter way through the test at that point, you don't have much time to recover. In addition, since only between 23 and 30 questions actually count (because of the presence of diagnostic questions), you may be more than one third into your test after ten questions. In any case, the conclusion is not relevant to any of us, since none of us will answer 8 of the first 10 questions incorrectly, unless we are genuinely sub-300 scorers on the GMAT. Yes, you can conclude from the result that it's a bad idea to guess at the first 10 questions, but I don't think that should come as any surprise. I agree entirely with terp, that the best strategy is to do as well as possible on every question, and it is certainly true that a series of bad answers at the end of a test can absolutely kill your score.
User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 42,395
Own Kudos:
82,126
Given Kudos: 24,110
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 42,395
Kudos: 82,126
(Un) Scientific analysis of gmatprep 01 Jul 2009, 21:58
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Whoa - just stumbled unto this thread - fantastic job BSD_Lover!
User avatar
pm4553
User avatar
Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Last visit: 10 Apr 2012
Posts: 329
Own Kudos:
136
Given Kudos: 92
Concentration: General Management
WE 1: Investment Banking - 6yrs
Posts: 329
Kudos: 136
(Un) Scientific analysis of gmatprep 02 Jul 2009, 04:49
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Kudos, bsd! Great, great, great analysis.

I'm not sure if it's out there - Is the GMATPrep scoring algorithm the same as the real GMAT? Does GMAC, ACT, Pearson VUE, state this explicitly?

Your performance on Quant has no correlation with your 1st Vebal question. I gauged this from GMATPrep - IMO
avatar
s138884
avatar
Joined: 20 Oct 2005
Last visit: 13 Jun 2010
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
3
 [1]
Posts: 16
Kudos: 3
 [1]
(Un) Scientific analysis of gmatprep 07 Jul 2009, 14:25
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I have conducted similar experiments too.

My observations:
For Quants getting as many (~20-25) initial question correct helps boost the score. However this does not hold true in case of Verbal. If we were to believe that the GMAT is truly adaptive test, that questions get harder as you answer correctly and that the harder questions carry higher weight, then this whole scheme seems to fall apart for Verbal.
User avatar
millhouse
User avatar
Joined: 02 Feb 2009
Last visit: 13 Jun 2012
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
8
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 25
Kudos: 8
(Un) Scientific analysis of gmatprep 07 Jul 2009, 22:45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I was wondering if the quickness of your answer affects your score. Does anybody know?

Say if I got lucky and guessed my last 5 questions right in whatever section in the span of 1 minute, would that score be higher if I had taken my time and answered them right in the span of 10 mins?

Thanks,
millhouse
User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 42,395
Own Kudos:
82,126
Given Kudos: 24,110
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 42,395
Kudos: 82,126
(Un) Scientific analysis of gmatprep 07 Jul 2009, 22:55
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I believe that timing in general does not matter with one exception several alluded to: it may ding you for answering too quickly (within a few seconds) since in that case you are just guessing.
User avatar
atomy
User avatar
Joined: 24 Apr 2009
Last visit: 05 Dec 2014
Posts: 43
Own Kudos:
28
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 43
Kudos: 28
(Un) Scientific analysis of gmatprep 17 Jul 2009, 02:22
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Guys i don't think that the prep software and actual exam algorithms are exactly same..
i've heard, so many people saying that what they observed on the prep was not completely same or true in the actual test..
In actual test, they got very diff. results from the strategies they "assumed" or followed by experimenting with gmatprep..with same difficulty questions..

So, i would rather focus on the concepts..
avatar
joshofnsit
avatar
Joined: 04 Jul 2009
Last visit: 13 Sep 2012
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
17
Given Kudos: 7
Concentration: International Business
Posts: 3
Kudos: 17
(Un) Scientific analysis of gmatprep 19 Jul 2009, 03:08
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bsd_lover
Yup, I was at it again today. Next set of experiments :
3. What is the importance of the last 17 questions?
Experiment : If I get the 1st 20 correct and mess up the last 17 what will happen ?
Methodology : Kick butt in the 1st 20 and guess the last 17
Results : Q49 with 12 wrong overall.
Analysis: Whoa !!! 49 ? with the same number wrong as the 1st experiment ... By Question 20 I had received all the tough quant concept questions that I could have ever hoped for. However, I wasn't expecting a score as high as 49. Although that might be because I got a few guesses on the last 17 right. Even so I'm sure I'd have received 46 or above here. Goes to underscore the importance of those first 10 questions compared to the last few.

4. What is the importance of CR in Verbal ?
Experiment : If I get all the CRs correct and mess up everything else what will happen ?
Methodology : Kick butt in all the CRs and guess everything else
Results : V13 with 29 wrong overall.
Analysis: I think I've busted my own myth that CR is more important than SC in some way. This doesn't seem to be the case. I got 11/11 CRs correct and still could not achieve more than 13. The CRs were different to the ones I usually get (at 40+ level). I encountered 4 of these CRs in the 1st 10 questions.
Show more

Superb analysis. It has broken one of my greatest myth. Thanks a lot bsd. :P
User avatar
mohater
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 Feb 2008
Last visit: 03 Jan 2020
Posts: 1,823
Own Kudos:
1,163
 [1]
Given Kudos: 234
Status:Accepting donations for the mohater MBA debt repayment fund
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Operations, Finance
Schools: Ross '14 (M)
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V38
GPA: 3.54
WE:Accounting (Manufacturing)
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: Ross '14 (M)
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V38
Posts: 1,823
Kudos: 1,163
 [1]
(Un) Scientific analysis of gmatprep 23 Jul 2009, 07:17
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The Manhattan GMAT people have done their own analysis on this concept as well:

https://www.manhattangmat.com/gmat-prep- ... -annex.cfm
User avatar
robertrdzak
User avatar
Joined: 03 Nov 2007
Last visit: 30 Sep 2011
Posts: 106
Own Kudos:
292
 [2]
Given Kudos: 9
Affiliations: CFA L3 Candidate, Grad w/ Highest Honors
Location: USA
Concentration: Investment Management
Schools:Chicago Booth R2 (WL), Wharton R2 w/ int, Kellogg R2 w/ int
GPA: 3.877
WE 1: Global Operations (Futures & Portfolio Financing) - Hedge Fund ($10bn+ Multi-Strat)
WE 2: Investment Analyst (Credit strategies) - Fund of Hedge Fund ($10bn+ Multi-Strat)
Posts: 106
Kudos: 292
 [2]
(Un) Scientific analysis of gmatprep 07 Aug 2009, 10:38
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I thought I would add a unique expereince with GMAT Prep.

I took the GMATPrep2 yesterday and scored 3 wrong (all in a row) in the first 10. Questions 8, 9 and 10 to be specific. I then scored another 3 wrong on the next 10 questions and 1 wrong in the last 17.

Questions.............# Wrong
1-10.........................3
11-20.......................3
21-37.......................1

Overal Quant score: 50

I really do not think the first 10 or even 20 are as heavily weighted as most people think. MGMAT seems to follow this belief as well.
User avatar
pm4553
User avatar
Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Last visit: 10 Apr 2012
Posts: 329
Own Kudos:
136
Given Kudos: 92
Concentration: General Management
WE 1: Investment Banking - 6yrs
Posts: 329
Kudos: 136
(Un) Scientific analysis of gmatprep 07 Aug 2009, 11:13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
robertrdzak
I thought I would add a unique expereince with GMAT Prep.

I took the GMATPrep2 yesterday and scored 3 wrong (all in a row) in the first 10. Questions 8, 9 and 10 to be specific. I then scored another 3 wrong on the next 10 questions and 1 wrong in the last 17.

Questions.............# Wrong
1-10.........................3
11-20.......................3
21-37.......................1

Overal Quant score: 50

I really do not think the first 10 or even 20 are as heavily weighted as most people think. MGMAT seems to follow this belief as well.
Show more

The wrong answers could be experimental questions, so Q50 is possible.
User avatar
aj1545
User avatar
Joined: 16 Sep 2009
Last visit: 11 May 2010
Posts: 95
Own Kudos:
13
Given Kudos: 10
Concentration: Technology
Schools:HBS, Stanford, Haas, Booth, Columbia
Posts: 95
Kudos: 13
(Un) Scientific analysis of gmatprep 23 Sep 2009, 03:32
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I missed 9 Quant on the GMATPrep Test. Got first 13 correct and then missed questions evenly for next 23. They were tough. First, time taking test. I got a 50Q. Just thought I would put up my 2 cents. I am a strong believer that first 10 matter most.

Also, missed 9 in V and got a 41. Then, (on different software) missed first 2 and only 4 total and got a 39V!
User avatar
aj1545
User avatar
Joined: 16 Sep 2009
Last visit: 11 May 2010
Posts: 95
Own Kudos:
13
Given Kudos: 10
Concentration: Technology
Schools:HBS, Stanford, Haas, Booth, Columbia
Posts: 95
Kudos: 13
(Un) Scientific analysis of gmatprep 28 Sep 2009, 16:04
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bb


Fantastic GMAT Score - must be 750?
Show more

I got a 730 actually on the GMATprep. I have yet to take the second one and I am saving it for the week before my test (Oct. 10).

I have taken Kaplan twice and got 710 & 760. Manhattan = 730. Princeton = 710. I have traditionally performed well on test day so I am hoping that I get 700+. I think that my app will speak for itself as long as I can get in the game.
avatar
sury1985
avatar
Joined: 05 Aug 2009
Last visit: 22 Feb 2011
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
1
Posts: 9
Kudos: 1
(Un) Scientific analysis of gmatprep 04 Oct 2009, 23:30
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Great experiment... Keep going..

I got a 46 in quant with 16 mistakes and 44 in quant with just 11 mistakes.
when i got a 44 i got a series of 3 questions wrong and when i got 46, my mistakes were spread. My guess is that mistakes done continously cost more.
User avatar
osbornecox
User avatar
Joined: 04 Dec 2009
Last visit: 26 Jan 2016
Posts: 373
Own Kudos:
80
Given Kudos: 4
Schools: Johnson '14 (A) INSEAD '14 (A) Booth '14 (M) Oxford '14 (A) Kellogg 1YR '13 (D)
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
Schools: Johnson '14 (A) INSEAD '14 (A) Booth '14 (M) Oxford '14 (A) Kellogg 1YR '13 (D)
Posts: 373
Kudos: 80
(Un) Scientific analysis of gmatprep 04 Dec 2009, 06:43
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The test must be finished at all costs.
Don't ever get a "bad" streak of answering two or more wrong in a row.
   1   2   3   4   5   6   
Moderator:
MBAACCOUNT2025
General GMAT Forum Moderator
444 posts