Unlike newspapers in the old days, today's
newspapers and televised news programs are full of
stories about murders and assaults in our city. One
can only conclude from this change that
violent
crime is now out of control, and to be safe from
personal attack, one should not leave one's home
except for absolute necessities.
Which one of the following, if true, would cast the
most serious doubt On the conclusion?
(A) Newspapers and televised news programs have
more comprehensive coverage of violent
crime than newspapers did in the old days. -
Violent crime might've been out of control since old days. Only that media didn't cover it well in those times(B) National data show that violent crime is out of
control everywhere. not just in the author's
city. -
Conclusion compares today vs. old days not author's neighborhood vs everywhere else(C) Police records sbow thaI people experience
more violent crimes in their own
neighborhoods than they do outside their
neighborhoods. -
where the crime is committed is irrelevant(D) Murder comprised a larger proportion of
violent crimes in the old days than it does
today. -
Narrow. Talks only about murder.(E) News magazines play more important role
today in informing the public about crime
than they did in the old days. -
Out of Scope. It might play more important role, but that sheds no light on whether violent crime is out of control nowNOTE: Please Outline what is the Conclusion here, as the given explanation is not so clear about the conclusion part.