Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 11:01 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 11:01
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
goodyear2013
Joined: 21 Oct 2013
Last visit: 29 May 2020
Posts: 390
Own Kudos:
5,627
 [17]
Given Kudos: 289
Posts: 390
Kudos: 5,627
 [17]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
14
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,479
Own Kudos:
30,536
 [8]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,479
Kudos: 30,536
 [8]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
sadovskiya
Joined: 12 Feb 2013
Last visit: 19 Dec 2020
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 10
Status:I'm trying to GMAT?
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT Date: 06-22-2013
WE:Engineering (Consulting)
Posts: 19
Kudos: 42
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,479
Own Kudos:
30,536
 [3]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,479
Kudos: 30,536
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sadovskiya
I was settling on E, but I found the ",and ____, and ____" to be redundant. Someone please refresh my memory. Thanks.
Dear sadovskiya,
I'm happy to respond. :-) What's very tricky about this problem is the nested parallelism, that is, one parallel structure inside another.

It's perfectly true that with a single parallel structure, we absolutely would not repeat the word "and."
I want to do W and X and Y and Z.
Colloquially, one might say that for dramatic effect, but it would never be correct in the formalism demanded of the GMAT. It's unnecessarily wordy & redundant. That's perfectly clear.

It becomes very tricky when we nest parallelism, that is to say, when we put one parallel structure inside another. Let's start with this sentence:
He likes to read books and to take long walks at twilight.
That has simple parallelism --- the two infinitives in parallel, the two things this person likes to do. So far so good. Now, consider this sentence:
He likes to read mystery, Gothic novels, and books about the paranormal..
Again, perfectly fine simple parallelism --- here, the three things the person likes to read. Now, consider what happens when we combine all this information:
He likes to read mystery, Gothic novels, and books about the paranormal, and to take long walks at twilight..
That sentence is 100% grammatically correct. The subject matter is a bit to storybook for the GMAT, but the grammatical structure is typical of what could appear on the GMAT. Here, the parallelism of the different book types is the "inner parallelism", and the first "and" is for this list; the parallelism of the two infinitive phrases, what he likes to do, is the outer parallelism, and the second "and" is for that list. After the simple subject & verb, "he likes", we have two infinitive phrases in parallel, and inside the first of those infinitive phrases is a second parallel structure, the kinds of books. The two "and's" in this sentence have very different jobs are very different from doubling up "and's" in the same list.

One of the trickiest things about the GMAT SC is the way that almost any grammatical structure can be nested inside almost any other structure. GMAT SC sentences can be like "Russian dolls", with shorter structures nested inside larger structures, and the hardest thing to do with each conjunction & adverb & etc. it to figure out to which level of the sentence it applies.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
User avatar
sivasanjeev
Joined: 16 Jan 2013
Last visit: 22 Dec 2014
Posts: 116
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 56
Posts: 116
Kudos: 1,604
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dear Mike, I really liked the word 'nested'. Gives a whole new dimension to solving an SC Q. Thanks for the tip. Hope others pick the intricacies too.
User avatar
Nevernevergiveup
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Last visit: 20 Aug 2023
Posts: 1,008
Own Kudos:
3,015
 [2]
Given Kudos: 79
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 1,008
Kudos: 3,015
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Uses of the irrational number e in fields other than pure mathematics are seen in the calculation of
  • continuous compounding in finance,
  • terminal velocity in the field of physics,
  • exponential decay in chemistry, and
  • the constructing of the standard Western twelve-tone scale in music.

(A) the constructing is not parallel to remaining nouns in the list.

(B) Uses of the irrational number e in fields other than pure mathematics are the calculation of continuous compounding in finance, terminal velocity in physics, exponential decay in chemistry, and in the constructing
same error as in A.
Also uses are not calculation of all the items in list. They are the applications in which e is used.


(C) Uses of the irrational number e in fields other than pure mathematics are shown in the calculation of continuous compounding in finance, terminal velocity in physics, exponential decay in chemistry, and the constructing
same error of parallelism repeats here.

(D) In fields other than pure mathematics, the irrational number e is used in the calculation of continuous compounding in finance, terminal velocity in the field of physics, and exponential decay in chemistry, and the construction
in the field of adds to the redundancy here.
and twice in the list of items spoils parallelism.


(E) In fields other than pure mathematics, the irrational number e is used
    in the calculation of
      continuous compounding in finance,
      terminal velocity in physics, and
      exponential decay in chemistry,

    &
    in the construction
      of the standard Western twelve-tone scale in music.

This choice perfectly follows the parallelism.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,829
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,829
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts