Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Today I met another confusal on Modifier topic, posting here for your help!
OG11-93 The Supreme Court awarded the Central Intelligen Agency broad discretionary powers enabling it to withhold from the public the identifies of its sources of intelligence information
And says: The sentence clearly and grammatically explains that the Court granted powers that enable the Central Intelligence Agency to withhold certain information from the public. But
Og11-98
..., most of the Monument Valley Anasazi abandoned their homes to join other clans nhaving less limitations to water access.
And Og says: "having" is ambiguous because it is unclear whether it refers to the "Anasazi" or "other clans"
In my opinion, "having" here refers to and modifies only "other clans" because it follow immediately "other clans". It would be useful if you give me some comment on my reasoning and more! Many thanks!
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
It's difficult to analyze the question samples presented because they are not in context. Can you post the questions in their entirety for both?
sondenso
Hi guys,
Today I met another confusal on Modifier topic, posting here for your help!
OG11-93 The Supreme Court awarded the Central Intelligen Agency broad discretionary powers enabling it to withhold from the public the identifies of its sources of intelligence information
And says: The sentence clearly and grammatically explains that the Court granted powers that enable the Central Intelligence Agency to withhold certain information from the public. But
Og11-98
..., most of the Monument Valley Anasazi abandoned their homes to join other clans nhaving less limitations to water access.
And Og says: "having" is ambiguous because it is unclear whether it refers to the "Anasazi" or "other clans"
In my opinion, "having" here refers to and modifies only "other clans" because it follow immediately "other clans". It would be useful if you give me some comment on my reasoning and more! Many thanks!
I mean, why does "participle" -enabling, Og says, modify correctly "powers", but "having" in OG11-98 does not modify correctly "other clans"? Very confused!
I don't have my OG with me right now. I'll take a look at it tonight and get back to you. Is this in the Orange book or the other separate verbal book?
sondenso
jallenmorris
Is there a specific question you are asking?
Sorry Jallenmorris for late reply,
I mean, why does "participle" -enabling, Og says, modify correctly "powers", but "having" in OG11-98 does not modify correctly "other clans"? Very confused!
Thanks Jallenmorris,
Show more
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.