Hey!
I have a question about A: I have read in some guides, that for Weaken type of questions those variants which are confronting with information from the passage are usually not correct, that proper variant should add information information which is not controversial.
What do you think of this? Or maybe I am missing something.
Thank you!
bb
Explanation: A. Correct Answer. If the majority preferred Cola to Cola Extra, that would damage the conclusion because it suggests that the preference for "cola extra" was not actually due to the participants’ expectations about the secret ingredient. If the majority consistently preferred the regular cola, then the claim that expectation influences taste is undermined. This choice directly contradicts the idea that knowledge of the ingredient influenced the results.
B. Incorrect. This supports the conclusion rather than damaging it. If similar results were obtained with a different ingredient, it would further confirm that expectations about a secret ingredient (not the specific ingredient itself) influence taste.
C. Incorrect. While this might affect how participants perceive the drink, it doesn’t directly refute the idea that expectations (whether about a secret or bitter ingredient) influence taste. This does not weaken the argument since there was still a difference of preference among the groups.
D. Incorrect. This option reinforces the original expectation that vinegar would worse the taste and if people knew it was added, they would not choose the drink. This statement would strengthen the conclusion.
E. Incorrect. This is a neutral statement and does not affect the conclusion about expectations altering taste. Whether or not the glasses looked alike does not change the participants’ knowledge of the secret ingredient or their expectations.