Last visit was: 02 May 2026, 06:28 It is currently 02 May 2026, 06:28
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 02 May 2026
Posts: 110,008
Own Kudos:
812,457
 [1]
Given Kudos: 105,983
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 110,008
Kudos: 812,457
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 02 May 2026
Posts: 110,008
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,983
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 110,008
Kudos: 812,457
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
manlog
Joined: 08 Jan 2015
Last visit: 20 Aug 2018
Posts: 46
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 53
Posts: 46
Kudos: 63
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,391
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,391
Kudos: 15,573
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
manlog
Why C is incorrect? If the frequency of accidents (=number of accidents in a given time) is so high, because the road is the longest one, then adding more lights would not affect it, because it doesn't solve the problem. Thus the solution is inefficient.

First, no correlation has been drawn in the passage or in the answer choices between the length of the road and the frequency of the accidents. Nonetheless option D states that the majority of the accidents occured because of the very presence of the traffic lights. From this fact it can be concluded that adding more traffic lights would further increase the number of accidents because the very cause of the accidents is further increased. Thus this option effectively weakens the argument.

(Note: the answer choices of the weakening /strengthening questions may introduce new facts; thus these questions frequently consist of the wording "if true".)
User avatar
exc4libur
Joined: 24 Nov 2016
Last visit: 22 Mar 2022
Posts: 1,680
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 607
Location: United States
Posts: 1,680
Kudos: 1,470
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Along Highway 1, traffic is very tightly controlled by traffic lights placed every half mile to cut down on speeding. Motor vehicle accidents, however, are more common along Highway 1 than on any other road in the city. Clearly, this problem can only be solved by adding more traffic lights to the highway, reducing speeding even more.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the effectiveness of the solution proposed above?


A. The average speed on Highway 1 is already 35 miles per hour, making more traffic lights unnecessary.
B. The city council does not have sufficient funds budgeted for improvements along Highway 1.
C. Highway 1 is the longest road in the city, making motor vehicle accidents statistically more likely.
D. Most motor vehicle accidents along Highway 1 are rear-end collisions that occur when one of the parties is unable to stop safely at a traffic light.
E. There are more traffic-light controlled intersections on Highway 1 than there are on- and off-ramps.

[prem] in h1 traf is controld with lights every 1/2mi to -speed; but, h1 has more accds than any other road;
[c] so, accds will only be solved by +lights in h1 = -speed

[wkn] link: +lights=-sped vs h1=-acds? mybe h1 has +acd not bc of sped…

(A) irev;
(B) this doesnt cast doubt in the plan's effectiveness, because although the plan might not be implemented now, it could in the future, out;
(C) sure, h1 has +prob of accids, but this doesnt cast doubt on the effectiveness of the solution, in fact, this could streng by implyg that h1 needs more lights! out;
(E) irev;

Answer (D): +lights=+accd, which casts doubt on the effect of the sol.
User avatar
Krishna7568
Joined: 02 Aug 2021
Last visit: 14 Feb 2024
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 229
Location: Taiwan
GPA: 3.73
Posts: 15
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sayantanc2k
I think C is the answer. In "d" if add more traffic lights then the speed of vehicle will be relatively low they might end up stopping safely as one mile is bigger distance where vehicle can increase more speed as compared to half mile. Don't you think "d" is strengthening the plan.
User avatar
BottomJee
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 May 2019
Last visit: 09 Jun 2025
Posts: 994
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,009
Affiliations: GMAT Club
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q82 V81 DI82
GMAT 1: 430 Q31 V19
GMAT 2: 570 Q44 V25
GMAT 3: 660 Q48 V33
GPA: 3.26
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q82 V81 DI82
GMAT 3: 660 Q48 V33
Posts: 994
Kudos: 1,465
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think this is a high-quality question and I agree with explanation.
User avatar
ck77
Joined: 21 Jan 2025
Last visit: 23 Mar 2025
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Location: India
Posts: 5
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I don't agree with option D as the answer. If most accidents are due to rare end collisions caused at traffic lights, then how does adding more reduce them? There is no explicit mention that drivers are unable to stop safely due to excess speed. So I don't think we can assume that, in fact option D strengthens the argument by increasing the spots where accidents may occur.

Option C on the other hand mentions that the high occurrence of accidents on this highway is a function of it's length and thus even if we add more lights, we are not influencing the length of highway and thus the plan may not achieve the intended result
User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 01 May 2026
Posts: 43,181
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 24,687
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 43,181
Kudos: 83,767
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi. This is a weaken/cast doubt type of question.

(Note: the answer choices of the weakening /strengthening questions may introduce new facts; thus these questions frequently consist of the wording "if true".)

We are told that the city council believes that adding more lights to reduce speed is the solution but as D points out, that's only going to increase accidents because the city council is mistaken in their accident attribution. As D tells us - Speed is not causing the accidents, lights do.

Option D, does state what you said is not stated. We are told "If True" so we must accept it as truth.

Which of the following, if true,

D. Most motor vehicle accidents along Highway 1 are rear-end collisions that occur when one of the parties is unable to stop safely at a traffic light.


About option C) - we are not given any reason to believe that adding more lights to the longest, shortest, or whatever size highway this is, is going to NOT reduce accidents. The argument tells us that the city attributes the accidents to speed. This may be the the longest street but if we add 1,000 traffic lights, it will make this feel like a very short one and it will have an effect on speed which the city believes is the culprit. Lights don't influence the length of the road but rather the speed at which cars travel quite effectively.


ck77
I don't agree with option D as the answer. If most accidents are due to rare end collisions caused at traffic lights, then how does adding more reduce them? There is no explicit mention that drivers are unable to stop safely due to excess speed. So I don't think we can assume that, in fact option D strengthens the argument by increasing the spots where accidents may occur.

Option C on the other hand mentions that the high occurrence of accidents on this highway is a function of it's length and thus even if we add more lights, we are not influencing the length of highway and thus the plan may not achieve the intended result
Moderators:
Math Expert
110008 posts
Founder
43181 posts