Last visit was: 27 Mar 2025, 10:40 It is currently 27 Mar 2025, 10:40
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 27 March 2025
Posts: 100,113
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 92,732
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 100,113
Kudos: 711,356
 [16]
Kudos
Add Kudos
16
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 27 March 2025
Posts: 100,113
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 92,732
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 100,113
Kudos: 711,356
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 27 March 2025
Posts: 100,113
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 92,732
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 100,113
Kudos: 711,356
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Rickooreo
Joined: 24 Dec 2021
Last visit: 15 Feb 2023
Posts: 305
Own Kudos:
29
 [1]
Given Kudos: 240
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35
GPA: 3.95
WE:Real Estate (Consulting)
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35
Posts: 305
Kudos: 29
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel sayantanc2k bb

I am unable to understand the argument because of the following
Economic sanctions that forbid trade with countries with dictatorial governments assume that the dictator will change policies unacceptable to the imposing nation when the citizens of the country against which the sanctions are imposed lose sufficient access to necessities such as food, water, and clothing. The reasoning of the imposing nation regarding the success of the sanctions is flawed because _________

Say country A and country B are there
Country A (non-dictator country) imposes sanctions (in line with the bold sentence above) so Country A is imposing country?
Country B - country against which sanctions are imposed

Now read the following stimulus
citizens of the country against which the sanctions are imposed lose sufficient access to necessities such as food, water, and clothing.

Here we are talking about harm to the citizens of Country B. So the reason for imposing sanction by Country A has nothing to do with the risk on country A or country A's citizens. Is this correct understanding?
User avatar
BottomJee
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 May 2019
Last visit: 10 Oct 2024
Posts: 996
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,005
Affiliations: GMAT Club
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q82 V81 DI82
GMAT 1: 430 Q31 V19
GMAT 2: 570 Q44 V25
GMAT 3: 660 Q48 V33
GPA: 3.26
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q82 V81 DI82
GMAT 3: 660 Q48 V33
Posts: 996
Kudos: 1,087
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think this is a high-quality question and I agree with explanation.
User avatar
anne_123
Joined: 16 Jul 2023
Last visit: 08 Jun 2024
Posts: 35
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 22
Location: Brazil
GPA: 3.73
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The statement basically says:

Country X will impose economic sanctions on Country Y if Country Y has policies that go against the life quality measures that Country X finds acceptable. Country X expects the economic sanctions to be successful, meaning that the dictator from Country Y will change policies and ensure access to basic needs for Country Y's citizens.

That being said, from Country X's point of view, it does not matter if the dictator truly cares about the well-being of Country Y's citizens. The economic sanctions, from Country X's point of view, are a motivation strong enough to generate a change in policies, so that they be in accordance with what they believe is acceptable.

Option D stands that, since the dictator does not care about the inconvenience to its people, the plan will not be successful, which may not necessarily be the case, as the policies may change due to the fear of the economic consequences from the imposed sanction.

I don't see how option D can be the correct one in this case, can someone help me understand it?
User avatar
Ishita2000
Joined: 18 Jun 2023
Last visit: 07 Nov 2024
Posts: 14
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 14
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think this the explanation isn't clear enough, please elaborate. GMATNinja would be grateful if you please help with this question. Thanks a lot!
User avatar
Ishita2000
Joined: 18 Jun 2023
Last visit: 07 Nov 2024
Posts: 14
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 14
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Official Solution:


Which of the following best completes the passage below?

Economic sanctions that forbid trade with countries with dictatorial governments assume that the dictator will change policies unacceptable to the imposing nation when the citizens of the country against which the sanctions are imposed lose sufficient access to necessities such as food, water, and clothing. The reasoning of the imposing nation regarding the success of the sanctions is flawed because _________



A. citizens of the country against whom the sanctions are imposed are accustomed to being poor
B. the dictator has ideological reasons for maintaining national policy
C. the country imposing the sanctions relies on exports from the subject country
D. the dictator is not concerned by the inconvenience of his people
E. citizens of the country against whom the sanctions are imposed do not understand the leader’s policies


The question asks to find a flaw in the reasoning of the sanction-imposing nations - it does not ask to find whether or not the approach would be successful. The reasoning of the sanction imposing nation is as follows:

Premise: The people of the country lose sufficient access to necessities such as food, water, and clothing.

Conclusion: The dictator would change policies unacceptable to the imposing nation.

One underlying assumption in the reasoning of the imposing nation is that the dictator would be concerned by the inconvenience caused to his people who lose access to food, water and clothing, and because of his concern for his people, he would change the policies.

A. This option does not have relevance to the reasoning of the sanctioning country. The correct option must point out a flaw in the premise-to-conclusion link mentioned above. The people of the dictator’s nation might already be poor, but losing access to food, water and clothing cis an additional inconvenience which might influence the dictator to change the policies.

B. Although this option points out a reason why the sanction could be unsuccessful, this option does not address the connection between the premise and conclusion. As described earlier, the question asks to find a flaw in the reasoning of the sanction-imposing nations - it does not ask to find whether or not the approach would be successful. The dictator may have ideological reasons that might make the sanctions unsuccessful in changing his policies, but the reasoning of the sanctioning nations stated in the passage is not attacked by this option.

C. Although this option points out a reason why the sanction could be unsuccessful, this option does not address the connection between the premise and conclusion. As described earlier, the question asks to find a flaw in the reasoning of the sanction-imposing nations - it does not ask to find whether or not the approach would be successful. The economy of the imposing country might surfer because of the sanctioning, thereby giving a possibility that the sanction would be lifted, but the reasoning (premise-to-conclusion link) of the sanctioning nations stated in the passage is not attacked by this option.

D. CORRECT. This option correctly addresses the premise-to-conclusion link made in the passage. This option points to a flaw in one of the underlying assumptions in the reasoning. If the dictator is not concerned about the inconvenience of his people, he would not change the policies. The reasoning of the imposing nation would be flawed because a wrong assumption was made in the reasoning.

E. This option does not have relevance to the reasoning of the sanctioning country. The correct option must point out a flaw in the premise-to-conclusion link mentioned above. Whether the citizens of a country understand the dictator’s policy has nothing to do with the reasoning of the sanctioning country.


Answer: D
­Bunuel could you please elaborate by keeping two countries say X and Y and then throwing light on the solution
User avatar
sssdd1234
Joined: 18 Feb 2023
Last visit: 16 Mar 2025
Posts: 71
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 22
Posts: 71
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think this is a high-quality question and I agree with explanation.
User avatar
NeerajR2000
Joined: 16 Nov 2024
Last visit: 20 Dec 2024
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think the correct answer is:

the dictator has ideological reasons for maintaining national policy

This option highlights a crucial flaw in the reasoning of the imposing nation. Economic sanctions assume that the dictator will change policies due to pressure from citizens affected by the sanctions. However, if the dictator has strong ideological reasons for maintaining their policies, they may be willing to withstand the pressure and continue their current policies, even if it means their citizens suffer.

This option is a more plausible explanation for the flawed reasoning than the other options, which are less convincing or irrelevant to the context.

The option "the dictator is not concerned by the inconvenience of his people" is incorrect because it doesn't necessarily explain why the dictator wouldn't change their policies in response to economic sanctions.

A dictator who is unconcerned about their people's well-being might still change their policies if they believe it would benefit them personally or maintain their power. For example, if the sanctions are severe enough to threaten the dictator's own position or wealth, they might still choose to change their policies to alleviate the pressure.

In contrast, the correct option "the dictator has ideological reasons for maintaining national policy" suggests that the dictator's commitment to their policies is driven by deeply held beliefs or values, making them more resistant to changing their policies, even in the face of economic sanctions.
User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 27 Mar 2025
Posts: 40,333
Own Kudos:
78,467
 [1]
Given Kudos: 22,319
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 40,333
Kudos: 78,467
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi. This is a tricky question that requires understanding of the argument and the parameters provided within it. We have to analyze the reasoning of the imposing nation.

The key to this question is the setup:

assume that the dictator will change policies unacceptable to the imposing nation when the citizens of the country against which the sanctions are imposed lose sufficient access to necessities such as food, water, and clothing. The reasoning of the imposing nation regarding the success of the sanctions is flawed because

You have to prove that the reasoning is flawed. You do not need to explain why the dictator may not budge. Many reasons why the dictator may not budge but only one correct explanation why the reasoning is flawed.


The solution has to focus on the reasoning and assumption presented in the question. We are told that the assumption is that the suffering of people will force the dictator to change their policies. Thus any answer such as "Dictator will not change his mind" or an external factor such as "Aliens will invade" are outside of the scope of the argument. We are not told why the dictator may reverse their policy but if the answer is not based on the reasoning of the imposing nation, then it is not the answer.

P.S. I don't think the explanation below is an explanation of the argument. It seems to be explaining dictators and sanctions rather than the argument.

Moderator note: I revised the grammar of the question and a few answer choices to make it more appropriate.


NeerajR2000
I think the correct answer is:

the dictator has ideological reasons for maintaining national policy

This option highlights a crucial flaw in the reasoning of the imposing nation. Economic sanctions assume that the dictator will change policies due to pressure from citizens affected by the sanctions. However, if the dictator has strong ideological reasons for maintaining their policies, they may be willing to withstand the pressure and continue their current policies, even if it means their citizens suffer.

This option is a more plausible explanation for the flawed reasoning than the other options, which are less convincing or irrelevant to the context.

The option "the dictator is not concerned by the inconvenience of his people" is incorrect because it doesn't necessarily explain why the dictator wouldn't change their policies in response to economic sanctions.

A dictator who is unconcerned about their people's well-being might still change their policies if they believe it would benefit them personally or maintain their power. For example, if the sanctions are severe enough to threaten the dictator's own position or wealth, they might still choose to change their policies to alleviate the pressure.

In contrast, the correct option "the dictator has ideological reasons for maintaining national policy" suggests that the dictator's commitment to their policies is driven by deeply held beliefs or values, making them more resistant to changing their policies, even in the face of economic sanctions.
Moderators:
Math Expert
100113 posts
Founder
40333 posts