Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Aiming to score 760+? Attend this FREE session to learn how to Define your GMAT Strategy, Create your Study Plan and Master the Core Skills to excel on the GMAT.
42% (01:04) correct 58% (00:57) wrong based on 77 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
The later generation Roman kings, flamboyant sybarites, held parties in their courts, they sported ethnic delicacies, choicest of cocktails, and randy performances by courtesans
A. The later generation Roman kings, flamboyant sybarites, held parties in their courts, they sported B. Parties were held in the courts of the later generation Roman kings, flamboyant sybarites, which featured C. The later generation Roman kings, flamboyant sybarites in their courts, held parties sporting D. The later generation Roman kings, flamboyant sybarites, held parties in their courts that sported E. In their courts, the later generation Roman kings, flamboyant sybarites, held parties that sported
The later generation Roman kings, flamboyant sybarites, held parties in their courts, they sported ethnic delicacies, choicest of cocktails, and randy performances by courtesans
A. The later generation Roman kings, flamboyant sybarites, held parties in their courts, they sported B. Parties were held in the courts of the later generation Roman kings, flamboyant sybarites, which featured C. The later generation Roman kings, flamboyant sybarites in their courts, held parties sporting D. The later generation Roman kings, flamboyant sybarites, held parties in their courts that sported E. In their courts, the later generation Roman kings, flamboyant sybarites, held parties that sported
A: A run- on sentence
B: flamboyant sybarites, which featured --- Relative pronoun touch rule foul
C: flamboyant sybarites in their courts—wrong diction: If they were sybarites only in their courts, what were they outside their courts?
D: their courts that sported—courts do not sport delicacies
E. held parties that sported --- correct modification and correct choice
I think this is a poor-quality question and I don't agree with the explanation. I do not understand why D is out and E is OK. In choice D, in explanation, it says that "that" refers to courts. However, I think that "in their courts" is modifier for the noun "parties", so that can refer to "parties" unambiguously. So D should also be a correct answer.
I think this is a poor-quality question and I don't agree with the explanation. I do not understand why D is out and E is OK. In choice D, in explanation, it says that "that" refers to courts. However, I think that "in their courts" is modifier for the noun "parties", so that can refer to "parties" unambiguously. So D should also be a correct answer.
D. The later generation Roman kings, flamboyant sybarites, held parties in their courts that sported You are absolutely correct that "IN THEIR COURTS" is modifier that is modifying PARTIES. But, PLACEMENT of THAT is incorrect LOGICALLY.
Answer following question, WHAT sported delicacies, cocktails ????? Is it PARTIES or COURTS....?? I guess your answer would be PARTIES.... But, as per option D, the answer is COURTS...
E. In their courts, the later generation Roman kings, flamboyant sybarites, held parties that sported In option E, placement of THAT is correct, conveying intended meaning. _________________
If you like the post, show appreciation by pressing Kudos button
Here is my take: a) Two sentence with clauses connected by a comma- incorrect grammatical constructions. b) Which needs to refer back to parties: no way is that possible in this option. c) Incorrect meaning- as if they were only sybarites in the courts. d) vs e) This one was tough, but I ll say that we see two options- one in which that is very close to the word "parties"- word it needs to modify. Chose the case that does best justice to the construction- chose E.
Right Answer : E
_________________
we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender!
In option, D held parties in their courts that sported... though it seems like "ethnic delicacies, choicest of cocktails" modify courts, I have seen examples where modifier can be separated by a prepositional phrase( in their courts) when there is no other option. Option E starts with "in their". Shouldn't there be a pronoun ambiguity? Can a pronoun refer to a noun forwards?
I think a better answer should be The later generation Roman kings, flamboyant sybarites, in their courts held parties in their courts that sported ethnic delicacies, choicest of cocktails, and randy performances by courtesans.
close
42% (01:04) correct 
