korhiyatryinghard
Hi Souvik,
I wanted to check on the following. In option C the way who is used is slightly confusing.
Does not the option mean that the graduate student was selectively paying careful attention to ONLY those people in the audience who had a mixed reaction and not to everyone.
1) Is my understanding correct?
2) If Yes. Isnt this a change in meaning ?
3) If no. Can you please guide me how i can avoid this mistake in future. What concept am I missing ?
Option C is alright and the meaning you indicated would be conveyed if there were no comma before "who". Let me briefly summarize the difference between essential and non-essential modifiers:
Essential modifier:
mandatory- required to define the noun it refers to - no comma - removal of the modifier changes the meaning of the sentence.
example: I hate men who brag.
meaning: Say there are 100 men and 30 of them brag. I hate only those 30 bragging men ("selectively" as you mentioned).
Removal of the modifier would imply that I hate all 100 men rather than just those 30 bragging men - meaning changes.
Non-essential modifier:
not mandatory - says something extra about the noun it refers to - comma required - removal of the modifier does not change the meaning of the sentence.
example: I hate men, who brag.
meaning: Say there are 100 men. I hate all 100 of them. Extra information- those 100 men brag.
Removal of the modifier would still imply that I hate all 100 men - the meaning does not change.
Thanks a lot. Your explanation is spot on
I got what i was missing - The comma was playing the devil in my mind.
1) Is it true that all non essential modifiers contain a comma ALWAYS. Considering which is a non essential modifier if it occurs without a comma i can rule this out as a wrong option?
2) Is it true that all essential modifier never contain a comma. I think you have stated the same but wanted to clarify one more time.
Apologies for dragging...