Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Aug 2710:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
We’ve worked incredibly hard to build TTP into the best test prep experience possible, and it would mean a lot to us to win Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep. If TTP has helped you, we’d be incredibly grateful for your vote.
Sep 0410:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
What does test anxiety really look like on the GMAT? For many test takers, it does not look like a panic attack. Instead, it shows up as brain fog, rereading, negative comparisons, mental noise....
Sep 0609:30 AM EDT
-12:30 PM EST
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful EA course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Perfect class schedule and easy course access for working professionals. Class starts Sept. 6, 9:30am-12:30pm EST- Sep 09
07:00 AM PDT
-10:00 AM PDT
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway 
Sep 1507:00 PM EDT
-09:00 PM EST
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Sep 2108:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Oct. 13, 2026 - Jan. 7, 2027, 8:00pm-10:00pm EST
11 May 2026, 04:39
Kudos
Bookmarks
Hi gullyboy09 The question has been explained with similar query by hr1212 please refer the link
https://gmatclub.com/forum/v21-259904.h ... 2#p3624617
Also there were several explanation given by bb on the same question do check out those too. And if your doubt still persists do let us know, we will try our best to answer it.
https://gmatclub.com/forum/v21-259904.h ... 2#p3624617
Also there were several explanation given by bb on the same question do check out those too. And if your doubt still persists do let us know, we will try our best to answer it.
gullyboy09
11 May 2026, 08:17
Kudos
Bookmarks
Hi AbhishekP220108, if I refer to the official solution by jeffn (pasted below), what's given is "..if stroke victims themselves are rarely aware of the fact that they are experiencing stroke serious symptom..", now issue here is it is more like a premise of the question that they are not aware about it, or they do not perceive them to be serious, and medical center is trying to solve it by the material. Option B is talking about the problem that passage is trying to solve. If Option would be saying they rarely perceived by the stroke victims themselves, then it would have been fine, but here its perceived to be serious, meaning they can see those symptoms but they don't take it serious, and this is exactly passage tried to solve it, so how come this becomes a weakner.
(B) Stroke symptoms, while readily identifiable by those around stroke victims, are rarely perceived to be serious by the stroke victims themselves.
The educational materials are designed to encourage stroke victims to seek adequate medical attention when they experience stroke symptoms. But if stroke victims themselves are rarely aware of the fact that they are experiencing stroke serious symptoms, they will not be able to act on this advice. This would limit the extent to which the program meets its goal, so keep (B)
(B) Stroke symptoms, while readily identifiable by those around stroke victims, are rarely perceived to be serious by the stroke victims themselves.
The educational materials are designed to encourage stroke victims to seek adequate medical attention when they experience stroke symptoms. But if stroke victims themselves are rarely aware of the fact that they are experiencing stroke serious symptoms, they will not be able to act on this advice. This would limit the extent to which the program meets its goal, so keep (B)
11 May 2026, 16:07
Kudos
Bookmarks
Hi gullyboy09 let me try my hands on this
I completely see where you're coming from. It feels like Choice B is just restating the exact problem the medical center is trying to fix, right? But this is a classic GMAT trap where they test your ability to distinguish between what a plan intends to do and what is actually feasible.
You're absolutely right that the program wants to solve this perception issue. However, Choice B introduces a fundamental, physical roadblock that pure education just can't get past.
Let's map out the exact causal chain the program relies on:
The Causal Chain
Step 1: Doctor provides materials to at-risk patient.
Step 2: Patient learns that "Intense Symptom X" is a stroke and must be treated immediately.
Step 3: Patient experiences a stroke.
Step 4: [The Critical Link] Patient perceives they are having "Symptom X" and perceives it as serious.
Step 5: Patient seeks help.
Here’s why B is such a massive weakener. The medical center's program is entirely focused on Step 2—fixing a lack of knowledge. But Choice B completely attacks Step 4—real-time perception.
Choice B is essentially saying that when the stroke hits, the victim's brain physically cannot process the symptoms as "serious." (This is actually a real physiological thing in strokes!). So, if the victim's brain is misfiring during the actual event and filtering out the "seriousness," it doesn't matter if they memorized those pamphlets six months ago. They could literally have a PhD in stroke symptoms, but if their brain is currently telling them, "This is just a weird headache, no big deal," they aren't going to call for help.
Think of it like this: Imagine a park ranger gives hikers a training manual on how to stay calm and use a compass if a bear charges them. The intent of the manual is to stop panic. But what if a study shows that the second a human actually sees a charging bear, their brain's panic center completely takes over, making it physically impossible to remember or apply the compass training? Even though the training was designed to solve the panic, the biological reality of the situation completely blocks the training from working.
You made a really sharp observation about the passage saying symptoms are "easily confused." Let's look closely at that wording:
The Premise: Suggests people confuse the symptoms, which is an intellectual mistake.
The Solution: Provide information, which is an intellectual fix.
Choice B: Drops a bomb by saying that even when the symptoms are "readily identifiable" (meaning the victim knows what is happening), the victim still rarely perceives them as serious.
The educational materials can only tell you what to do once you realize things are serious. Choice B steps in and says that you will rarely realize it's serious in the first place, regardless of your training.
To quickly sum it up:
Choice A is a trap because it shifts the scope. It talks about people the program wasn't even trying to reach.
Choice B works because it destroys the program's effectiveness. It introduces a perceptual hurdle that renders the education completely useless for the exact people it’s trying to help.
Whenever a GMAT plan relies on education to change a behavior, the strongest weakener is almost always something that shows the behavior is caused by something a pamphlet can't fix—like a biological response or a physical inability.
I completely see where you're coming from. It feels like Choice B is just restating the exact problem the medical center is trying to fix, right? But this is a classic GMAT trap where they test your ability to distinguish between what a plan intends to do and what is actually feasible.
You're absolutely right that the program wants to solve this perception issue. However, Choice B introduces a fundamental, physical roadblock that pure education just can't get past.
Let's map out the exact causal chain the program relies on:
The Causal Chain
Step 1: Doctor provides materials to at-risk patient.
Step 2: Patient learns that "Intense Symptom X" is a stroke and must be treated immediately.
Step 3: Patient experiences a stroke.
Step 4: [The Critical Link] Patient perceives they are having "Symptom X" and perceives it as serious.
Step 5: Patient seeks help.
Here’s why B is such a massive weakener. The medical center's program is entirely focused on Step 2—fixing a lack of knowledge. But Choice B completely attacks Step 4—real-time perception.
Choice B is essentially saying that when the stroke hits, the victim's brain physically cannot process the symptoms as "serious." (This is actually a real physiological thing in strokes!). So, if the victim's brain is misfiring during the actual event and filtering out the "seriousness," it doesn't matter if they memorized those pamphlets six months ago. They could literally have a PhD in stroke symptoms, but if their brain is currently telling them, "This is just a weird headache, no big deal," they aren't going to call for help.
Think of it like this: Imagine a park ranger gives hikers a training manual on how to stay calm and use a compass if a bear charges them. The intent of the manual is to stop panic. But what if a study shows that the second a human actually sees a charging bear, their brain's panic center completely takes over, making it physically impossible to remember or apply the compass training? Even though the training was designed to solve the panic, the biological reality of the situation completely blocks the training from working.
You made a really sharp observation about the passage saying symptoms are "easily confused." Let's look closely at that wording:
The Premise: Suggests people confuse the symptoms, which is an intellectual mistake.
The Solution: Provide information, which is an intellectual fix.
Choice B: Drops a bomb by saying that even when the symptoms are "readily identifiable" (meaning the victim knows what is happening), the victim still rarely perceives them as serious.
The educational materials can only tell you what to do once you realize things are serious. Choice B steps in and says that you will rarely realize it's serious in the first place, regardless of your training.
To quickly sum it up:
Choice A is a trap because it shifts the scope. It talks about people the program wasn't even trying to reach.
Choice B works because it destroys the program's effectiveness. It introduces a perceptual hurdle that renders the education completely useless for the exact people it’s trying to help.
Whenever a GMAT plan relies on education to change a behavior, the strongest weakener is almost always something that shows the behavior is caused by something a pamphlet can't fix—like a biological response or a physical inability.
gullyboy09
