Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Jun 1006:00 AM PDT
-06:15 PM PDT
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..- Jun 10
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Scoring 715 on the GMAT Focus Edition requires more than just learning formulas, memorizing concepts, or solving hundreds of questions. In this episode, Nishant shares how he improved his GMAT preparation by focusing on application of concepts, and more. 
Jun 1111:00 AM EDT
-01:00 PM EDT
TTP GMAT OnDemand gives serious students 400+ hours of expert video instruction, the full TTP course, AI support, weekly office hours, and a 715+ score guarantee—all built for elite GMAT score improvement.
Jun 2207:30 PM EDT
-09:30 PM EDT
Master the GMAT with expert live instruction, a personalized study plan, and real-time support. Includes 40 hours of online classes plus 6 months of access to the TTP GMAT OnDemand video course. Class date: Mon/Wed June 22, 2026 →August 26, 2026
04 Jan 2024, 21:23
Kudos
Bookmarks
Historians have long debated whether the grand arcs of human affairs are best explained by the edicts of rulers or by the collective agency of ordinary people. Proponents of what is often called the “top-down” approach contend that decisive events, from wars to economic crises, were precipitated chiefly by sovereigns and their advisors, whose rare access to coercive power allowed them to steer outcomes inaccessible to the masses. Yet a contrasting “bottom-up” tradition, first articulated systematically by social historian E. P. Thompson, argues that the cumulative actions of non-elites can redirect even the most formidable political designs.
The debate is not merely theoretical. A quantitative study by Delgado (2018) found that 57 percent of major policy reversals in twentieth-century democracies were preceded by sustained grass-roots mobilization rather than by changes of leadership. Two cases are illustrative. In the United States, the Civil Rights Movement eventually compelled federal intervention despite presidents who, at the outset, regarded civil-rights legislation as electorally hazardous. Likewise, New Zealand’s 1893 enfranchisement of women, decades ahead of most Western nations, was achieved only after a nationwide petition carrying nearly one-tenth of the colony’s population forced Parliament’s hand. While charismatic figures such as Martin Luther King Jr. or suffragist Kate Sheppard became recognizable emblems, contemporary diaries and court records show that thousands of anonymous participants organized meetings, gathered signatures, and sustained boycotts that made reversal politically costlier than reform.
Critics of the bottom-up lens counter that successful movements typically exploit moments of elite division: without cracks among decision-makers, popular pressure alone may dissipate. Still, defenders reply that fractures at the top often arise because rank-and-file agitation alters the calculus of those in power. Whether one views ordinary actors as auteurs or merely catalytic, their presence complicates any historical narrative that confines causal agency to palaces and parliaments.
In the passage, the example of women’s suffrage in New Zealand is used chiefly to
A. illustrate how an early-adopting nation can influence the policies of larger powers
B. highlight the strategic use of charismatic leadership in securing public support for reforms
C. provide evidence that grassroots mobilization can compel legislative change ahead of global trends
D. demonstrate the limitations of petitions when unaccompanied by elite sponsorship
E. compare the relative effectiveness of referenda and parliamentary votes in progressive eras
The debate is not merely theoretical. A quantitative study by Delgado (2018) found that 57 percent of major policy reversals in twentieth-century democracies were preceded by sustained grass-roots mobilization rather than by changes of leadership. Two cases are illustrative. In the United States, the Civil Rights Movement eventually compelled federal intervention despite presidents who, at the outset, regarded civil-rights legislation as electorally hazardous. Likewise, New Zealand’s 1893 enfranchisement of women, decades ahead of most Western nations, was achieved only after a nationwide petition carrying nearly one-tenth of the colony’s population forced Parliament’s hand. While charismatic figures such as Martin Luther King Jr. or suffragist Kate Sheppard became recognizable emblems, contemporary diaries and court records show that thousands of anonymous participants organized meetings, gathered signatures, and sustained boycotts that made reversal politically costlier than reform.
Critics of the bottom-up lens counter that successful movements typically exploit moments of elite division: without cracks among decision-makers, popular pressure alone may dissipate. Still, defenders reply that fractures at the top often arise because rank-and-file agitation alters the calculus of those in power. Whether one views ordinary actors as auteurs or merely catalytic, their presence complicates any historical narrative that confines causal agency to palaces and parliaments.
In the passage, the example of women’s suffrage in New Zealand is used chiefly to
A. illustrate how an early-adopting nation can influence the policies of larger powers
B. highlight the strategic use of charismatic leadership in securing public support for reforms
C. provide evidence that grassroots mobilization can compel legislative change ahead of global trends
D. demonstrate the limitations of petitions when unaccompanied by elite sponsorship
E. compare the relative effectiveness of referenda and parliamentary votes in progressive eras
04 Jan 2024, 21:23
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Solution:
Historians have long debated whether the grand arcs of human affairs are best explained by the edicts of rulers or by the collective agency of ordinary people. Proponents of what is often called the “top-down” approach contend that decisive events, from wars to economic crises, were precipitated chiefly by sovereigns and their advisors, whose rare access to coercive power allowed them to steer outcomes inaccessible to the masses. Yet a contrasting “bottom-up” tradition, first articulated systematically by social historian E. P. Thompson, argues that the cumulative actions of non-elites can redirect even the most formidable political designs.
The debate is not merely theoretical. A quantitative study by Delgado (2018) found that 57 percent of major policy reversals in twentieth-century democracies were preceded by sustained grass-roots mobilization rather than by changes of leadership. Two cases are illustrative. In the United States, the Civil Rights Movement eventually compelled federal intervention despite presidents who, at the outset, regarded civil-rights legislation as electorally hazardous. Likewise, New Zealand’s 1893 enfranchisement of women, decades ahead of most Western nations, was achieved only after a nationwide petition carrying nearly one-tenth of the colony’s population forced Parliament’s hand. While charismatic figures such as Martin Luther King Jr. or suffragist Kate Sheppard became recognizable emblems, contemporary diaries and court records show that thousands of anonymous participants organized meetings, gathered signatures, and sustained boycotts that made reversal politically costlier than reform.
Critics of the bottom-up lens counter that successful movements typically exploit moments of elite division: without cracks among decision-makers, popular pressure alone may dissipate. Still, defenders reply that fractures at the top often arise because rank-and-file agitation alters the calculus of those in power. Whether one views ordinary actors as auteurs or merely catalytic, their presence complicates any historical narrative that confines causal agency to palaces and parliaments.
In the passage, the example of women’s suffrage in New Zealand is used chiefly to
A. illustrate how an early-adopting nation can influence the policies of larger powers
B. highlight the strategic use of charismatic leadership in securing public support for reforms
C. provide evidence that grassroots mobilization can compel legislative change ahead of global trends
D. demonstrate the limitations of petitions when unaccompanied by elite sponsorship
E. compare the relative effectiveness of referenda and parliamentary votes in progressive eras
A. Incorrect. Passage never claims NZ swayed other nations. Eliminate
B. Incorrect. Charismatic Kate Sheppard is mentioned in the passage, but focus is on thousands of petitioners, not on leadership strategy. Eliminate
C. CORRECT ANSWER. Evidence that grassroots action can compel early legislative change Example shows a mass petition forcing Parliament to act “decades ahead” of peers.
D. Incorrect. Show limits of petitions without elites. However, Petition succeeded, and this choice contradicts the passage. Eliminate
E. Incorrect. No discussion of voting mechanisms is taking place in the passage. Eliminate
Answer: C
Historians have long debated whether the grand arcs of human affairs are best explained by the edicts of rulers or by the collective agency of ordinary people. Proponents of what is often called the “top-down” approach contend that decisive events, from wars to economic crises, were precipitated chiefly by sovereigns and their advisors, whose rare access to coercive power allowed them to steer outcomes inaccessible to the masses. Yet a contrasting “bottom-up” tradition, first articulated systematically by social historian E. P. Thompson, argues that the cumulative actions of non-elites can redirect even the most formidable political designs.
The debate is not merely theoretical. A quantitative study by Delgado (2018) found that 57 percent of major policy reversals in twentieth-century democracies were preceded by sustained grass-roots mobilization rather than by changes of leadership. Two cases are illustrative. In the United States, the Civil Rights Movement eventually compelled federal intervention despite presidents who, at the outset, regarded civil-rights legislation as electorally hazardous. Likewise, New Zealand’s 1893 enfranchisement of women, decades ahead of most Western nations, was achieved only after a nationwide petition carrying nearly one-tenth of the colony’s population forced Parliament’s hand. While charismatic figures such as Martin Luther King Jr. or suffragist Kate Sheppard became recognizable emblems, contemporary diaries and court records show that thousands of anonymous participants organized meetings, gathered signatures, and sustained boycotts that made reversal politically costlier than reform.
Critics of the bottom-up lens counter that successful movements typically exploit moments of elite division: without cracks among decision-makers, popular pressure alone may dissipate. Still, defenders reply that fractures at the top often arise because rank-and-file agitation alters the calculus of those in power. Whether one views ordinary actors as auteurs or merely catalytic, their presence complicates any historical narrative that confines causal agency to palaces and parliaments.
In the passage, the example of women’s suffrage in New Zealand is used chiefly to
A. illustrate how an early-adopting nation can influence the policies of larger powers
B. highlight the strategic use of charismatic leadership in securing public support for reforms
C. provide evidence that grassroots mobilization can compel legislative change ahead of global trends
D. demonstrate the limitations of petitions when unaccompanied by elite sponsorship
E. compare the relative effectiveness of referenda and parliamentary votes in progressive eras
A. Incorrect. Passage never claims NZ swayed other nations. Eliminate
B. Incorrect. Charismatic Kate Sheppard is mentioned in the passage, but focus is on thousands of petitioners, not on leadership strategy. Eliminate
C. CORRECT ANSWER. Evidence that grassroots action can compel early legislative change Example shows a mass petition forcing Parliament to act “decades ahead” of peers.
D. Incorrect. Show limits of petitions without elites. However, Petition succeeded, and this choice contradicts the passage. Eliminate
E. Incorrect. No discussion of voting mechanisms is taking place in the passage. Eliminate
Answer: C
17 May 2025, 21:44
Kudos
Bookmarks
The passage and questions have been updated.
