Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
May 0510:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
GMAT Inequalities is a high-frequency topic in GMAT Quant, but many students struggle because the concepts behave differently from standard algebra. Understanding the right rules, patterns, and edge cases can significantly improve both speed and accuracy.- May 06
08:30 AM PDT
-09:30 AM PDT
In Episode 3 of our GMAT Ninja Critical Reasoning series, we tackle Discrepancy, Paradox, and Explain an Oddity questions. You know the feeling: the passage gives you two facts that seem completely contradictory.... - May 08
08:00 AM PDT
-08:30 AM PDT
Join the special YouTube live-stream for selecting the winners of GMAT Club MBA Scholarships sponsored by Juno live. Watch who gets these coveted MBA scholarships offered by GMAT Club and Juno.
21 Sep 2024, 13:19
Kudos
Bookmarks
The Ming treasure voyages were maritime expeditions undertaken by Ming China's treasure fleet between 1405 and 1433. The grand project resulted in seven far-reaching ocean voyages to the coastal territories and islands of the South China Sea and Indian Ocean. Admiral Zheng He was commissioned to command the fleet for the expeditions. The first three voyages reached up to Calicut on India's Malabar Coast, while the fourth voyage went as far as Hormuz in the Persian Gulf. In the last three voyages, the fleet traveled up to the Arabian Peninsula and East Africa.
The Chinese expeditionary fleet was heavily militarized and carried great amounts of treasures, which served to project Chinese power and wealth to the known world. They brought back many foreign ambassadors whose kings and rulers were willing to declare themselves tributaries of China. Moreover, the Chinese restructured and established control over an expansive maritime network in which the region became interconnected on an economic and political level. The Chinese did not seek territory and were motivated primarily by political and economic control with domination over a vast network of ports and shipping lanes.
The trade still flourished long after the voyages had ceased. Chinese ships continued to control the Eastern Asian maritime trade. They also kept on trading with India and East Africa. However, the imperial tributary system over the foreign regions and state monopoly over the foreign trade gradually broke down as time progressed.
It is not exactly known why the Ming treasure voyages completely ended in 1433. Duyvendak suggests that the heavy costs partly contributed to the ending of the expeditions, but Ray, Finlay, and Dreyer note that the costs had not overburdened the Ming treasury. Ray adds that the voyages were a profitable enterprise and rejects the notion that the voyages were terminated because they were wasteful, costly, or uneconomic. Ray states that the cessation of the voyages happened as traders and bureaucrats, for reasons of economic self-interest and through their connections in Beijing, gradually collapsed the framework supporting both the state-controlled maritime enterprise and the strict regulation of private commerce with prohibitive policies.
According to the passage, which of the following most accurately characterizes the relationship between the Chinese fleet and the foreign ambassadors they encountered during the Ming treasure voyages?
A. The ambassadors were brought back as a demonstration of China’s military superiority over the foreign territories.
B. The ambassadors were coerced into pledging allegiance to China as part of a broader strategy to control foreign trade routes.
C. The ambassadors were brought back voluntarily, with their rulers willing to declare themselves tributaries to China.
D. The Chinese sought to establish long-term political alliances with foreign ambassadors to secure trade monopolies.
E. The ambassadors were brought back as part of a diplomatic initiative to foster mutual economic growth.
The Chinese expeditionary fleet was heavily militarized and carried great amounts of treasures, which served to project Chinese power and wealth to the known world. They brought back many foreign ambassadors whose kings and rulers were willing to declare themselves tributaries of China. Moreover, the Chinese restructured and established control over an expansive maritime network in which the region became interconnected on an economic and political level. The Chinese did not seek territory and were motivated primarily by political and economic control with domination over a vast network of ports and shipping lanes.
The trade still flourished long after the voyages had ceased. Chinese ships continued to control the Eastern Asian maritime trade. They also kept on trading with India and East Africa. However, the imperial tributary system over the foreign regions and state monopoly over the foreign trade gradually broke down as time progressed.
It is not exactly known why the Ming treasure voyages completely ended in 1433. Duyvendak suggests that the heavy costs partly contributed to the ending of the expeditions, but Ray, Finlay, and Dreyer note that the costs had not overburdened the Ming treasury. Ray adds that the voyages were a profitable enterprise and rejects the notion that the voyages were terminated because they were wasteful, costly, or uneconomic. Ray states that the cessation of the voyages happened as traders and bureaucrats, for reasons of economic self-interest and through their connections in Beijing, gradually collapsed the framework supporting both the state-controlled maritime enterprise and the strict regulation of private commerce with prohibitive policies.
According to the passage, which of the following most accurately characterizes the relationship between the Chinese fleet and the foreign ambassadors they encountered during the Ming treasure voyages?
A. The ambassadors were brought back as a demonstration of China’s military superiority over the foreign territories.
B. The ambassadors were coerced into pledging allegiance to China as part of a broader strategy to control foreign trade routes.
C. The ambassadors were brought back voluntarily, with their rulers willing to declare themselves tributaries to China.
D. The Chinese sought to establish long-term political alliances with foreign ambassadors to secure trade monopolies.
E. The ambassadors were brought back as part of a diplomatic initiative to foster mutual economic growth.
21 Sep 2024, 13:19
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Solution:
The Ming treasure voyages were maritime expeditions undertaken by Ming China's treasure fleet between 1405 and 1433. The grand project resulted in seven far-reaching ocean voyages to the coastal territories and islands of the South China Sea and Indian Ocean. Admiral Zheng He was commissioned to command the fleet for the expeditions. The first three voyages reached up to Calicut on India's Malabar Coast, while the fourth voyage went as far as Hormuz in the Persian Gulf. In the last three voyages, the fleet traveled up to the Arabian Peninsula and East Africa.
The Chinese expeditionary fleet was heavily militarized and carried great amounts of treasures, which served to project Chinese power and wealth to the known world. They brought back many foreign ambassadors whose kings and rulers were willing to declare themselves tributaries of China. Moreover, the Chinese restructured and established control over an expansive maritime network in which the region became interconnected on an economic and political level. The Chinese did not seek territory and were motivated primarily by political and economic control with domination over a vast network of ports and shipping lanes.
The trade still flourished long after the voyages had ceased. Chinese ships continued to control the Eastern Asian maritime trade. They also kept on trading with India and East Africa. However, the imperial tributary system over the foreign regions and state monopoly over the foreign trade gradually broke down as time progressed.
It is not exactly known why the Ming treasure voyages completely ended in 1433. Duyvendak suggests that the heavy costs partly contributed to the ending of the expeditions, but Ray, Finlay, and Dreyer note that the costs had not overburdened the Ming treasury. Ray adds that the voyages were a profitable enterprise and rejects the notion that the voyages were terminated because they were wasteful, costly, or uneconomic. Ray states that the cessation of the voyages happened as traders and bureaucrats, for reasons of economic self-interest and through their connections in Beijing, gradually collapsed the framework supporting both the state-controlled maritime enterprise and the strict regulation of private commerce with prohibitive policies.
According to the passage, which of the following most accurately characterizes the relationship between the Chinese fleet and the foreign ambassadors they encountered during the Ming treasure voyages?
A. The ambassadors were brought back as a demonstration of China’s military superiority over the foreign territories.
B. The ambassadors were coerced into pledging allegiance to China as part of a broader strategy to control foreign trade routes.
C. The ambassadors were brought back voluntarily, with their rulers willing to declare themselves tributaries to China.
D. The Chinese sought to establish long-term political alliances with foreign ambassadors to secure trade monopolies.
E. The ambassadors were brought back as part of a diplomatic initiative to foster mutual economic growth.
A. Incorrect. The passage does not suggest that the ambassadors were brought back as a show of military superiority. While the Chinese fleet was heavily militarized, the passage emphasizes political and economic control rather than military dominance. Therefore, this option misrepresents the nature of the relationship between the fleet and the ambassadors.
B. Incorrect. The passage states that foreign rulers were willing to declare themselves tributaries of China, meaning there was no coercion involved. This option incorrectly implies that the ambassadors were forced into allegiance, which is not supported by the text.
C. Correct Answer. The passage clearly states that foreign rulers were willing to declare themselves tributaries of China, which aligns with the idea that the ambassadors were brought back voluntarily. This option accurately reflects the passage's description of the relationship between the Chinese fleet and the foreign ambassadors.
D. Incorrect. The passage does not suggest that they sought long-term political alliances to secure trade monopolies. This option introduces the idea of monopolies, which is not discussed in the passage.
E. Incorrect. The passage focuses on political and economic control through the tributary system rather than mutual economic growth. This option misinterprets the purpose of the diplomatic relations established during the voyages.
Answer: C
The Ming treasure voyages were maritime expeditions undertaken by Ming China's treasure fleet between 1405 and 1433. The grand project resulted in seven far-reaching ocean voyages to the coastal territories and islands of the South China Sea and Indian Ocean. Admiral Zheng He was commissioned to command the fleet for the expeditions. The first three voyages reached up to Calicut on India's Malabar Coast, while the fourth voyage went as far as Hormuz in the Persian Gulf. In the last three voyages, the fleet traveled up to the Arabian Peninsula and East Africa.
The Chinese expeditionary fleet was heavily militarized and carried great amounts of treasures, which served to project Chinese power and wealth to the known world. They brought back many foreign ambassadors whose kings and rulers were willing to declare themselves tributaries of China. Moreover, the Chinese restructured and established control over an expansive maritime network in which the region became interconnected on an economic and political level. The Chinese did not seek territory and were motivated primarily by political and economic control with domination over a vast network of ports and shipping lanes.
The trade still flourished long after the voyages had ceased. Chinese ships continued to control the Eastern Asian maritime trade. They also kept on trading with India and East Africa. However, the imperial tributary system over the foreign regions and state monopoly over the foreign trade gradually broke down as time progressed.
It is not exactly known why the Ming treasure voyages completely ended in 1433. Duyvendak suggests that the heavy costs partly contributed to the ending of the expeditions, but Ray, Finlay, and Dreyer note that the costs had not overburdened the Ming treasury. Ray adds that the voyages were a profitable enterprise and rejects the notion that the voyages were terminated because they were wasteful, costly, or uneconomic. Ray states that the cessation of the voyages happened as traders and bureaucrats, for reasons of economic self-interest and through their connections in Beijing, gradually collapsed the framework supporting both the state-controlled maritime enterprise and the strict regulation of private commerce with prohibitive policies.
According to the passage, which of the following most accurately characterizes the relationship between the Chinese fleet and the foreign ambassadors they encountered during the Ming treasure voyages?
A. The ambassadors were brought back as a demonstration of China’s military superiority over the foreign territories.
B. The ambassadors were coerced into pledging allegiance to China as part of a broader strategy to control foreign trade routes.
C. The ambassadors were brought back voluntarily, with their rulers willing to declare themselves tributaries to China.
D. The Chinese sought to establish long-term political alliances with foreign ambassadors to secure trade monopolies.
E. The ambassadors were brought back as part of a diplomatic initiative to foster mutual economic growth.
A. Incorrect. The passage does not suggest that the ambassadors were brought back as a show of military superiority. While the Chinese fleet was heavily militarized, the passage emphasizes political and economic control rather than military dominance. Therefore, this option misrepresents the nature of the relationship between the fleet and the ambassadors.
B. Incorrect. The passage states that foreign rulers were willing to declare themselves tributaries of China, meaning there was no coercion involved. This option incorrectly implies that the ambassadors were forced into allegiance, which is not supported by the text.
C. Correct Answer. The passage clearly states that foreign rulers were willing to declare themselves tributaries of China, which aligns with the idea that the ambassadors were brought back voluntarily. This option accurately reflects the passage's description of the relationship between the Chinese fleet and the foreign ambassadors.
D. Incorrect. The passage does not suggest that they sought long-term political alliances to secure trade monopolies. This option introduces the idea of monopolies, which is not discussed in the passage.
E. Incorrect. The passage focuses on political and economic control through the tributary system rather than mutual economic growth. This option misinterprets the purpose of the diplomatic relations established during the voyages.
Answer: C
15 Jan 2026, 19:58
Kudos
Bookmarks
I like the solution - it’s helpful. Doubt in Option C -> 'The ambassadors were brought back voluntarily, with their rulers willing to declare themselves tributaries to China.'
How are we concluding that the ambassadors were "voluntarily" brought back?
How are we concluding that the ambassadors were "voluntarily" brought back?
