Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 1612:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
You’re first to know: Save $200 on GMAT prep starting tomorrow, 4/13. Get 6 official practice tests and study with real questions. Be ready to save!
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
05 Oct 2024, 21:28
Kudos
Bookmarks
D
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
50% (01:38) correct
50%
(01:39)
wrong
based on 4
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The financial markets in London underwent significant development during the late 17th and early 18th centuries. The establishment of the Bank of England in 1694, amidst the Nine Years' War, marked the creation of a national debt system and introduced Bills of Exchange, which became the foundation of modern banking. London's financial landscape was further invigorated by overseas investments, particularly from Amsterdam and France, and by the Treaty of Utrecht (1713), which granted Britain the right to supply slaves to Spanish America. This influx of capital, combined with other financial innovations like joint-stock companies, lotteries, and insurance firms, fueled London’s rise as a global financial center.
Among these ventures was the South Sea Company, founded in 1711 with the purpose of managing part of Britain’s national debt and exploiting lucrative trade opportunities in Spanish South America. The Company quickly became the subject of intense speculation, with its stock prices soaring in 1720. Investors from all classes, including royalty, were swept into a speculative frenzy. John Blunt, one of the company’s leaders, was even knighted for his role in elevating public credit.
However, the South Sea Company’s promises of vast profits proved hollow. The stock price, artificially inflated through loans and speculative trading, eventually collapsed. By late 1720, shares had plummeted, leaving many investors, including brilliant physicists such as Isaac Newton, in financial ruin. The fallout led to a parliamentary inquiry that uncovered widespread corruption, including insider trading and political bribery. Key figures, such as the Chancellor of the Exchequer, faced impeachment and punishment.
Despite the catastrophic impact on investors, the broader economic system endured. The South Sea Company itself continued to operate until 1853, serving as a sobering reminder of the dangers inherent in speculative financial bubbles. The event also sparked public debate about the need for stricter regulation and transparency in financial markets.
Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument that the broader economic system endured in the long-term despite the collapse of the South Sea Company?
A. The British government continued to issue Bills of Exchange and develop new financial products even after the collapse of the South Sea Company.
B. Most of the investors who suffered losses in the South Sea Company were able to recover their fortunes through investments in other joint-stock companies.
C. The South Sea Company was able to avoid bankruptcy and continued its trading ventures well into the 19th century.
D. The collapse of the South Sea Company led to stricter financial regulations, which resulted in a more resilient financial market over time.
E. International investors continued to view London as a stable financial center, but foreign capital inflows never recovered.
Among these ventures was the South Sea Company, founded in 1711 with the purpose of managing part of Britain’s national debt and exploiting lucrative trade opportunities in Spanish South America. The Company quickly became the subject of intense speculation, with its stock prices soaring in 1720. Investors from all classes, including royalty, were swept into a speculative frenzy. John Blunt, one of the company’s leaders, was even knighted for his role in elevating public credit.
However, the South Sea Company’s promises of vast profits proved hollow. The stock price, artificially inflated through loans and speculative trading, eventually collapsed. By late 1720, shares had plummeted, leaving many investors, including brilliant physicists such as Isaac Newton, in financial ruin. The fallout led to a parliamentary inquiry that uncovered widespread corruption, including insider trading and political bribery. Key figures, such as the Chancellor of the Exchequer, faced impeachment and punishment.
Despite the catastrophic impact on investors, the broader economic system endured. The South Sea Company itself continued to operate until 1853, serving as a sobering reminder of the dangers inherent in speculative financial bubbles. The event also sparked public debate about the need for stricter regulation and transparency in financial markets.
Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument that the broader economic system endured in the long-term despite the collapse of the South Sea Company?
A. The British government continued to issue Bills of Exchange and develop new financial products even after the collapse of the South Sea Company.
B. Most of the investors who suffered losses in the South Sea Company were able to recover their fortunes through investments in other joint-stock companies.
C. The South Sea Company was able to avoid bankruptcy and continued its trading ventures well into the 19th century.
D. The collapse of the South Sea Company led to stricter financial regulations, which resulted in a more resilient financial market over time.
E. International investors continued to view London as a stable financial center, but foreign capital inflows never recovered.
05 Oct 2024, 21:28
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Solution:
The financial markets in London underwent significant development during the late 17th and early 18th centuries. The establishment of the Bank of England in 1694, amidst the Nine Years' War, marked the creation of a national debt system and introduced Bills of Exchange, which became the foundation of modern banking. London's financial landscape was further invigorated by overseas investments, particularly from Amsterdam and France, and by the Treaty of Utrecht (1713), which granted Britain the right to supply slaves to Spanish America. This influx of capital, combined with other financial innovations like joint-stock companies, lotteries, and insurance firms, fueled London’s rise as a global financial center.
Among these ventures was the South Sea Company, founded in 1711 with the purpose of managing part of Britain’s national debt and exploiting lucrative trade opportunities in Spanish South America. The Company quickly became the subject of intense speculation, with its stock prices soaring in 1720. Investors from all classes, including royalty, were swept into a speculative frenzy. John Blunt, one of the company’s leaders, was even knighted for his role in elevating public credit.
However, the South Sea Company’s promises of vast profits proved hollow. The stock price, artificially inflated through loans and speculative trading, eventually collapsed. By late 1720, shares had plummeted, leaving many investors, including brilliant physicists such as Isaac Newton, in financial ruin. The fallout led to a parliamentary inquiry that uncovered widespread corruption, including insider trading and political bribery. Key figures, such as the Chancellor of the Exchequer, faced impeachment and punishment.
Despite the catastrophic impact on investors, the broader economic system endured. The South Sea Company itself continued to operate until 1853, serving as a sobering reminder of the dangers inherent in speculative financial bubbles. The event also sparked public debate about the need for stricter regulation and transparency in financial markets.
Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument that the broader economic system endured in the long-term despite the collapse of the South Sea Company?
A. The British government continued to issue Bills of Exchange and develop new financial products even after the collapse of the South Sea Company.
B. Most of the investors who suffered losses in the South Sea Company were able to recover their fortunes through investments in other joint-stock companies.
C. The South Sea Company was able to avoid bankruptcy and continued its trading ventures well into the 19th century.
D. The collapse of the South Sea Company led to stricter financial regulations, which resulted in a more resilient financial market over time.
E. International investors continued to view London as a stable financial center, but foreign capital inflows never recovered.
(A): Incorrect. This option suggests that financial practices continued after the collapse. The development of new financial products does not necessarily indicate that the system became stronger over time and endured. We just know that the British government continued developing new products (that could be even the case if the old system had collapsed). This option does not give us much reassurance.
(B): Incorrect. This answer choice takes a different view. This option focuses on personal financial recovery, which is separate from the system’s overall resilience. That's great for them but the recovery of individual investors doesn’t directly address the broader economic system’s endurance in the long term. So we can eliminate this nice option.
(C): Incorrect. The survival of the South Sea Company itself does not directly relate to the broader economic system’s endurance. We know that the company was limping along for a long time but that could have been in either case.
(D): Correct Answer. The introduction of stricter financial regulations that made the market more resilient over time directly supports the idea that the broader economic system endured in the long term. This shows that the collapse led to reforms that strengthened the overall system, ensuring its survival and future stability. This to a large extent paraphrases our question, so may seem too easy and obvious of a choice to some.
(E): Incorrect. The mention that foreign capital inflows never recovered contradicts the argument that the broader economic system endured in the long term. This option instead weakens the argument.
Answer: D
The financial markets in London underwent significant development during the late 17th and early 18th centuries. The establishment of the Bank of England in 1694, amidst the Nine Years' War, marked the creation of a national debt system and introduced Bills of Exchange, which became the foundation of modern banking. London's financial landscape was further invigorated by overseas investments, particularly from Amsterdam and France, and by the Treaty of Utrecht (1713), which granted Britain the right to supply slaves to Spanish America. This influx of capital, combined with other financial innovations like joint-stock companies, lotteries, and insurance firms, fueled London’s rise as a global financial center.
Among these ventures was the South Sea Company, founded in 1711 with the purpose of managing part of Britain’s national debt and exploiting lucrative trade opportunities in Spanish South America. The Company quickly became the subject of intense speculation, with its stock prices soaring in 1720. Investors from all classes, including royalty, were swept into a speculative frenzy. John Blunt, one of the company’s leaders, was even knighted for his role in elevating public credit.
However, the South Sea Company’s promises of vast profits proved hollow. The stock price, artificially inflated through loans and speculative trading, eventually collapsed. By late 1720, shares had plummeted, leaving many investors, including brilliant physicists such as Isaac Newton, in financial ruin. The fallout led to a parliamentary inquiry that uncovered widespread corruption, including insider trading and political bribery. Key figures, such as the Chancellor of the Exchequer, faced impeachment and punishment.
Despite the catastrophic impact on investors, the broader economic system endured. The South Sea Company itself continued to operate until 1853, serving as a sobering reminder of the dangers inherent in speculative financial bubbles. The event also sparked public debate about the need for stricter regulation and transparency in financial markets.
Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument that the broader economic system endured in the long-term despite the collapse of the South Sea Company?
A. The British government continued to issue Bills of Exchange and develop new financial products even after the collapse of the South Sea Company.
B. Most of the investors who suffered losses in the South Sea Company were able to recover their fortunes through investments in other joint-stock companies.
C. The South Sea Company was able to avoid bankruptcy and continued its trading ventures well into the 19th century.
D. The collapse of the South Sea Company led to stricter financial regulations, which resulted in a more resilient financial market over time.
E. International investors continued to view London as a stable financial center, but foreign capital inflows never recovered.
(A): Incorrect. This option suggests that financial practices continued after the collapse. The development of new financial products does not necessarily indicate that the system became stronger over time and endured. We just know that the British government continued developing new products (that could be even the case if the old system had collapsed). This option does not give us much reassurance.
(B): Incorrect. This answer choice takes a different view. This option focuses on personal financial recovery, which is separate from the system’s overall resilience. That's great for them but the recovery of individual investors doesn’t directly address the broader economic system’s endurance in the long term. So we can eliminate this nice option.
(C): Incorrect. The survival of the South Sea Company itself does not directly relate to the broader economic system’s endurance. We know that the company was limping along for a long time but that could have been in either case.
(D): Correct Answer. The introduction of stricter financial regulations that made the market more resilient over time directly supports the idea that the broader economic system endured in the long term. This shows that the collapse led to reforms that strengthened the overall system, ensuring its survival and future stability. This to a large extent paraphrases our question, so may seem too easy and obvious of a choice to some.
(E): Incorrect. The mention that foreign capital inflows never recovered contradicts the argument that the broader economic system endured in the long term. This option instead weakens the argument.
Answer: D
