Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Aug 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
Save up to $1,000 on select GMAT prep now. This Fall, achieve your most ambitious goals with millions of student success stories behind you.
Aug 2710:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
We’ve worked incredibly hard to build TTP into the best test prep experience possible, and it would mean a lot to us to win Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep. If TTP has helped you, we’d be incredibly grateful for your vote.
Aug 3110:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM EDT
Top Scores Start with a Elite Online Prep Course. Enroll for 6 months of access to over 400 hours of GMAT video lessons AND 715+ Score Guarantee!
Sep 0907:00 AM PDT
-10:00 AM PDT
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway
24 Jun 2025, 22:00
Kudos
Bookmarks
In Edo-period Japan (1603–1868), society was structured under a strict class hierarchy, where clothing and material possessions visibly reflected one's social rank and role. Sumptuary regulations, known as Shōgunal edicts, were enforced to preserve this order by controlling the use of luxurious fabrics, colors, and patterns. These laws not only distinguished the samurai elite from commoners but also imposed distinctions within the warrior class itself. Lavish silk robes, embroidered patterns, and imported dyes were symbols of rank, while commoners were restricted to muted colors and basic cotton garments. The concept of “appropriate dress” became an essential element in maintaining social stability and reinforcing the existing power dynamics.
As Japan's economy expanded during the late Edo period, affluent merchant families began to accumulate wealth rivaling that of the samurai. With this newfound prosperity came the desire to display status through luxurious textiles and ornate accessories, challenging the established class distinctions. Merchants, though legally beneath samurai, began to sponsor kabuki theater, tea ceremonies, and elaborate festivals, where they could subtly showcase their affluence through patterned kimonos and discreet silk linings. To counter this perceived threat, the shogunate periodically revised sumptuary laws, restricting the use of gold embroidery, bright colors, and brocades exclusively to the samurai elite, so that no merchant could appear their equal.
Despite these efforts, the economic clout of wealthy merchants continued to grow, gradually shifting the balance of power. By the mid-19th century, economic privilege increasingly outweighed hereditary status as a marker of influence. This shift paralleled rising discontent with the rigid feudal order, culminating in the Meiji Restoration of 1868, which dissolved the shogunate and dismantled the class-based dress codes.
A pivotal proclamation issued in 1871 further crystallized this transformation: “All persons, regardless of class, are free to adopt Western dress or traditional attire as they see fit.” This decree not only marked the formal collapse of Edo Japan’s sumptuary system but also symbolized the broader societal shift towards modernization and equality, reflecting Japan’s ambitions to align with Western nations in the emerging global order.
Each of the following statements is supported by information in the passage EXCEPT:
A. Sumptuary laws in Edo-period Japan sought to effectively reinforce social distinctions through regulation of clothing and luxury materials.
B. Wealthy merchants increasingly donned luxurious garments, challenging established social norms.
C. The erosion of hereditary privilege and the rise of economic power helped bring down the class-based dress system.
D. Merchants’ attempts to imitate the samurai were largely ineffective in altering the broader social hierarchy.
E. The Meiji Restoration formally ended sumptuary laws and class-based restrictions on dress.
As Japan's economy expanded during the late Edo period, affluent merchant families began to accumulate wealth rivaling that of the samurai. With this newfound prosperity came the desire to display status through luxurious textiles and ornate accessories, challenging the established class distinctions. Merchants, though legally beneath samurai, began to sponsor kabuki theater, tea ceremonies, and elaborate festivals, where they could subtly showcase their affluence through patterned kimonos and discreet silk linings. To counter this perceived threat, the shogunate periodically revised sumptuary laws, restricting the use of gold embroidery, bright colors, and brocades exclusively to the samurai elite, so that no merchant could appear their equal.
Despite these efforts, the economic clout of wealthy merchants continued to grow, gradually shifting the balance of power. By the mid-19th century, economic privilege increasingly outweighed hereditary status as a marker of influence. This shift paralleled rising discontent with the rigid feudal order, culminating in the Meiji Restoration of 1868, which dissolved the shogunate and dismantled the class-based dress codes.
A pivotal proclamation issued in 1871 further crystallized this transformation: “All persons, regardless of class, are free to adopt Western dress or traditional attire as they see fit.” This decree not only marked the formal collapse of Edo Japan’s sumptuary system but also symbolized the broader societal shift towards modernization and equality, reflecting Japan’s ambitions to align with Western nations in the emerging global order.
Each of the following statements is supported by information in the passage EXCEPT:
A. Sumptuary laws in Edo-period Japan sought to effectively reinforce social distinctions through regulation of clothing and luxury materials.
B. Wealthy merchants increasingly donned luxurious garments, challenging established social norms.
C. The erosion of hereditary privilege and the rise of economic power helped bring down the class-based dress system.
D. Merchants’ attempts to imitate the samurai were largely ineffective in altering the broader social hierarchy.
E. The Meiji Restoration formally ended sumptuary laws and class-based restrictions on dress.
24 Jun 2025, 22:00
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Solution:
In Edo-period Japan (1603–1868), society was structured under a strict class hierarchy, where clothing and material possessions visibly reflected one's social rank and role. Sumptuary regulations, known as Shōgunal edicts, were enforced to preserve this order by controlling the use of luxurious fabrics, colors, and patterns. These laws not only distinguished the samurai elite from commoners but also imposed distinctions within the warrior class itself. Lavish silk robes, embroidered patterns, and imported dyes were symbols of rank, while commoners were restricted to muted colors and basic cotton garments. The concept of “appropriate dress” became an essential element in maintaining social stability and reinforcing the existing power dynamics.
As Japan's economy expanded during the late Edo period, affluent merchant families began to accumulate wealth rivaling that of the samurai. With this newfound prosperity came the desire to display status through luxurious textiles and ornate accessories, challenging the established class distinctions. Merchants, though legally beneath samurai, began to sponsor kabuki theater, tea ceremonies, and elaborate festivals, where they could subtly showcase their affluence through patterned kimonos and discreet silk linings. To counter this perceived threat, the shogunate periodically revised sumptuary laws, restricting the use of gold embroidery, bright colors, and brocades exclusively to the samurai elite, so that no merchant could appear their equal.
Despite these efforts, the economic clout of wealthy merchants continued to grow, gradually shifting the balance of power. By the mid-19th century, economic privilege increasingly outweighed hereditary status as a marker of influence. This shift paralleled rising discontent with the rigid feudal order, culminating in the Meiji Restoration of 1868, which dissolved the shogunate and dismantled the class-based dress codes.
A pivotal proclamation issued in 1871 further crystallized this transformation: “All persons, regardless of class, are free to adopt Western dress or traditional attire as they see fit.” This decree not only marked the formal collapse of Edo Japan’s sumptuary system but also symbolized the broader societal shift towards modernization and equality, reflecting Japan’s ambitions to align with Western nations in the emerging global order.
Each of the following statements is supported by information in the passage EXCEPT:
A. Sumptuary laws in Edo-period Japan sought to effectively reinforce social distinctions through regulation of clothing and luxury materials.
B. Wealthy merchants increasingly donned luxurious garments, challenging established social norms.
C. The erosion of hereditary privilege and the rise of economic power helped bring down the class-based dress system.
D. Merchants’ attempts to imitate the samurai were largely ineffective in altering the broader social hierarchy.
E. The Meiji Restoration formally ended sumptuary laws and class-based restrictions on dress.
A) Supported. Sumptuary laws did regulate fabrics, colors, and patterns to reinforce class distinctions, matching the passage.
B) Supported. The passage explains that wealthy merchants increasingly wore luxurious clothing, challenging established social norms.
C) Supported. The text notes that rising economic power eroded hereditary privilege, helping dismantle the class-based dress system.
D) Not supported. The passage says merchants’ emulation of samurai dress undermined, rather than failed to influence, the social hierarchy, so this statement is not supported.
E) Supported. The Meiji Restoration is cited as formally ending sumptuary laws and class-based clothing restrictions.
Answer: D
In Edo-period Japan (1603–1868), society was structured under a strict class hierarchy, where clothing and material possessions visibly reflected one's social rank and role. Sumptuary regulations, known as Shōgunal edicts, were enforced to preserve this order by controlling the use of luxurious fabrics, colors, and patterns. These laws not only distinguished the samurai elite from commoners but also imposed distinctions within the warrior class itself. Lavish silk robes, embroidered patterns, and imported dyes were symbols of rank, while commoners were restricted to muted colors and basic cotton garments. The concept of “appropriate dress” became an essential element in maintaining social stability and reinforcing the existing power dynamics.
As Japan's economy expanded during the late Edo period, affluent merchant families began to accumulate wealth rivaling that of the samurai. With this newfound prosperity came the desire to display status through luxurious textiles and ornate accessories, challenging the established class distinctions. Merchants, though legally beneath samurai, began to sponsor kabuki theater, tea ceremonies, and elaborate festivals, where they could subtly showcase their affluence through patterned kimonos and discreet silk linings. To counter this perceived threat, the shogunate periodically revised sumptuary laws, restricting the use of gold embroidery, bright colors, and brocades exclusively to the samurai elite, so that no merchant could appear their equal.
Despite these efforts, the economic clout of wealthy merchants continued to grow, gradually shifting the balance of power. By the mid-19th century, economic privilege increasingly outweighed hereditary status as a marker of influence. This shift paralleled rising discontent with the rigid feudal order, culminating in the Meiji Restoration of 1868, which dissolved the shogunate and dismantled the class-based dress codes.
A pivotal proclamation issued in 1871 further crystallized this transformation: “All persons, regardless of class, are free to adopt Western dress or traditional attire as they see fit.” This decree not only marked the formal collapse of Edo Japan’s sumptuary system but also symbolized the broader societal shift towards modernization and equality, reflecting Japan’s ambitions to align with Western nations in the emerging global order.
Each of the following statements is supported by information in the passage EXCEPT:
A. Sumptuary laws in Edo-period Japan sought to effectively reinforce social distinctions through regulation of clothing and luxury materials.
B. Wealthy merchants increasingly donned luxurious garments, challenging established social norms.
C. The erosion of hereditary privilege and the rise of economic power helped bring down the class-based dress system.
D. Merchants’ attempts to imitate the samurai were largely ineffective in altering the broader social hierarchy.
E. The Meiji Restoration formally ended sumptuary laws and class-based restrictions on dress.
A) Supported. Sumptuary laws did regulate fabrics, colors, and patterns to reinforce class distinctions, matching the passage.
B) Supported. The passage explains that wealthy merchants increasingly wore luxurious clothing, challenging established social norms.
C) Supported. The text notes that rising economic power eroded hereditary privilege, helping dismantle the class-based dress system.
D) Not supported. The passage says merchants’ emulation of samurai dress undermined, rather than failed to influence, the social hierarchy, so this statement is not supported.
E) Supported. The Meiji Restoration is cited as formally ending sumptuary laws and class-based clothing restrictions.
Answer: D
