|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
24 Aug 2025, 21:30
Kudos
Bookmarks
In the early twentieth century, sociologist W. E. B. Du Bois returned again and again to the forces shaping African American life during the Great Migration. Building on The Philadelphia Negro and later city surveys, he argued that while the lure of northern factory wages was undeniable, the deeper story involved the parallel growth of religious institutions, educational initiatives, and mutual-aid networks that forged a distinct urban identity. Du Bois maintained that only by viewing these social mechanisms in concert could one explain how newly arrived migrants avoided complete social dislocation and instead created neighborhoods possessing their own schools, newspapers, and political clubs.
Subsequent historians have expanded this frame, probing the interlocking roles of Black churches, women’s clubs, and fraternal orders such as the Prince Hall Masons. In Chicago’s South Side and Detroit’s Paradise Valley, pastors did more than preach: they organized literacy programs, registered voters, and negotiated with white landlords. Fraternal bodies, meanwhile, raised mortgage pools, sponsored scholarship contests, and staged public parades that reinforced collective pride. Scholars note that in many districts these institutions operated alongside—and sometimes inside—emerging economic ventures, with storefront sanctuaries doubling as meeting halls for cooperative grocery associations or barbershop owners’ guilds. The social and the commercial, in other words, frequently occupied the same basement room.
Although the entrepreneurial success of Black restaurateurs, funeral-home directors, and beauty-culture magnates has long featured in migration narratives, historians disagree on how far business prowess alone propelled wider community development. By the 1920s, church federations and lodge chapters were funding playgrounds, health clinics, and legal-aid societies, yet their relative influence varied by city, denomination, and gender composition. The braided relationships among economic ambition, cultural assertion, and civic activism resist tidy summary, prompting scholars to revisit primary sources and ask whether any single category can claim primacy in shaping Black urban modernity.
The author of the passage mentions fraternal organizations such as the Prince Hall Masons primarily in order to
A. emphasize the decisive role of Black-owned businesses in financing urban community services during the Great Migration
B. corroborate Du Bois’s assertion that economic opportunity was the single most important draw for southern migrants to northern cities
C. illustrate how fraternal groups contributed to social welfare and collective advancement within African American urban communities
D. show that economic ventures during the Great Migration were wholly dependent on partnerships with religious institutions
E. contrast organizations that offered ceremonial camaraderie with churches that delivered practical resources
Subsequent historians have expanded this frame, probing the interlocking roles of Black churches, women’s clubs, and fraternal orders such as the Prince Hall Masons. In Chicago’s South Side and Detroit’s Paradise Valley, pastors did more than preach: they organized literacy programs, registered voters, and negotiated with white landlords. Fraternal bodies, meanwhile, raised mortgage pools, sponsored scholarship contests, and staged public parades that reinforced collective pride. Scholars note that in many districts these institutions operated alongside—and sometimes inside—emerging economic ventures, with storefront sanctuaries doubling as meeting halls for cooperative grocery associations or barbershop owners’ guilds. The social and the commercial, in other words, frequently occupied the same basement room.
Although the entrepreneurial success of Black restaurateurs, funeral-home directors, and beauty-culture magnates has long featured in migration narratives, historians disagree on how far business prowess alone propelled wider community development. By the 1920s, church federations and lodge chapters were funding playgrounds, health clinics, and legal-aid societies, yet their relative influence varied by city, denomination, and gender composition. The braided relationships among economic ambition, cultural assertion, and civic activism resist tidy summary, prompting scholars to revisit primary sources and ask whether any single category can claim primacy in shaping Black urban modernity.
The author of the passage mentions fraternal organizations such as the Prince Hall Masons primarily in order to
A. emphasize the decisive role of Black-owned businesses in financing urban community services during the Great Migration
B. corroborate Du Bois’s assertion that economic opportunity was the single most important draw for southern migrants to northern cities
C. illustrate how fraternal groups contributed to social welfare and collective advancement within African American urban communities
D. show that economic ventures during the Great Migration were wholly dependent on partnerships with religious institutions
E. contrast organizations that offered ceremonial camaraderie with churches that delivered practical resources
24 Aug 2025, 21:30
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Solution:
In the early twentieth century, sociologist W. E. B. Du Bois returned again and again to the forces shaping African American life during the Great Migration. Building on The Philadelphia Negro and later city surveys, he argued that while the lure of northern factory wages was undeniable, the deeper story involved the parallel growth of religious institutions, educational initiatives, and mutual-aid networks that forged a distinct urban identity. Du Bois maintained that only by viewing these social mechanisms in concert could one explain how newly arrived migrants avoided complete social dislocation and instead created neighborhoods possessing their own schools, newspapers, and political clubs.
Subsequent historians have expanded this frame, probing the interlocking roles of Black churches, women’s clubs, and fraternal orders such as the Prince Hall Masons. In Chicago’s South Side and Detroit’s Paradise Valley, pastors did more than preach: they organized literacy programs, registered voters, and negotiated with white landlords. Fraternal bodies, meanwhile, raised mortgage pools, sponsored scholarship contests, and staged public parades that reinforced collective pride. Scholars note that in many districts these institutions operated alongside—and sometimes inside—emerging economic ventures, with storefront sanctuaries doubling as meeting halls for cooperative grocery associations or barbershop owners’ guilds. The social and the commercial, in other words, frequently occupied the same basement room.
Although the entrepreneurial success of Black restaurateurs, funeral-home directors, and beauty-culture magnates has long featured in migration narratives, historians disagree on how far business prowess alone propelled wider community development. By the 1920s, church federations and lodge chapters were funding playgrounds, health clinics, and legal-aid societies, yet their relative influence varied by city, denomination, and gender composition. The braided relationships among economic ambition, cultural assertion, and civic activism resist tidy summary, prompting scholars to revisit primary sources and ask whether any single category can claim primacy in shaping Black urban modernity.
The author of the passage mentions fraternal organizations such as the Prince Hall Masons primarily in order to
A. emphasize the decisive role of Black-owned businesses in financing urban community services during the Great Migration
B. corroborate Du Bois’s assertion that economic opportunity was the single most important draw for southern migrants to northern cities
C. illustrate how fraternal groups contributed to social welfare and collective advancement within African American urban communities
D. show that economic ventures during the Great Migration were wholly dependent on partnerships with religious institutions
E. contrast organizations that offered ceremonial camaraderie with churches that delivered practical resources
(A) Incorrect: The answer links fraternal orders to financing urban services, but the passage describes them as sources of mutual aid and pride, not primary business underwriters.
(B) Incorrect: This choice claims Du Bois saw economic opportunity as the single dominant draw; the passage says he viewed it as one factor among several, so the reference to fraternal groups does not “corroborate” such a claim.
(C) Correct Answer: The passage states that fraternal bodies “raised mortgage pools, sponsored scholarship contests, and staged public parades,” illustrating their contributions to social welfare and collective advancement.
(D) Incorrect: It asserts that economic ventures were wholly dependent on church partnerships, whereas the passage merely notes that communal institutions sometimes operated alongside or within emerging businesses.
(E) Incorrect: The answer sets up a contrast (ceremonial camaraderie versus practical resources) that the passage never makes; churches and fraternal orders are presented as complementary, each providing tangible community benefits.
Answer: C
In the early twentieth century, sociologist W. E. B. Du Bois returned again and again to the forces shaping African American life during the Great Migration. Building on The Philadelphia Negro and later city surveys, he argued that while the lure of northern factory wages was undeniable, the deeper story involved the parallel growth of religious institutions, educational initiatives, and mutual-aid networks that forged a distinct urban identity. Du Bois maintained that only by viewing these social mechanisms in concert could one explain how newly arrived migrants avoided complete social dislocation and instead created neighborhoods possessing their own schools, newspapers, and political clubs.
Subsequent historians have expanded this frame, probing the interlocking roles of Black churches, women’s clubs, and fraternal orders such as the Prince Hall Masons. In Chicago’s South Side and Detroit’s Paradise Valley, pastors did more than preach: they organized literacy programs, registered voters, and negotiated with white landlords. Fraternal bodies, meanwhile, raised mortgage pools, sponsored scholarship contests, and staged public parades that reinforced collective pride. Scholars note that in many districts these institutions operated alongside—and sometimes inside—emerging economic ventures, with storefront sanctuaries doubling as meeting halls for cooperative grocery associations or barbershop owners’ guilds. The social and the commercial, in other words, frequently occupied the same basement room.
Although the entrepreneurial success of Black restaurateurs, funeral-home directors, and beauty-culture magnates has long featured in migration narratives, historians disagree on how far business prowess alone propelled wider community development. By the 1920s, church federations and lodge chapters were funding playgrounds, health clinics, and legal-aid societies, yet their relative influence varied by city, denomination, and gender composition. The braided relationships among economic ambition, cultural assertion, and civic activism resist tidy summary, prompting scholars to revisit primary sources and ask whether any single category can claim primacy in shaping Black urban modernity.
The author of the passage mentions fraternal organizations such as the Prince Hall Masons primarily in order to
A. emphasize the decisive role of Black-owned businesses in financing urban community services during the Great Migration
B. corroborate Du Bois’s assertion that economic opportunity was the single most important draw for southern migrants to northern cities
C. illustrate how fraternal groups contributed to social welfare and collective advancement within African American urban communities
D. show that economic ventures during the Great Migration were wholly dependent on partnerships with religious institutions
E. contrast organizations that offered ceremonial camaraderie with churches that delivered practical resources
(A) Incorrect: The answer links fraternal orders to financing urban services, but the passage describes them as sources of mutual aid and pride, not primary business underwriters.
(B) Incorrect: This choice claims Du Bois saw economic opportunity as the single dominant draw; the passage says he viewed it as one factor among several, so the reference to fraternal groups does not “corroborate” such a claim.
(C) Correct Answer: The passage states that fraternal bodies “raised mortgage pools, sponsored scholarship contests, and staged public parades,” illustrating their contributions to social welfare and collective advancement.
(D) Incorrect: It asserts that economic ventures were wholly dependent on church partnerships, whereas the passage merely notes that communal institutions sometimes operated alongside or within emerging businesses.
(E) Incorrect: The answer sets up a contrast (ceremonial camaraderie versus practical resources) that the passage never makes; churches and fraternal orders are presented as complementary, each providing tangible community benefits.
Answer: C
