Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
May 0510:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
GMAT Inequalities is a high-frequency topic in GMAT Quant, but many students struggle because the concepts behave differently from standard algebra. Understanding the right rules, patterns, and edge cases can significantly improve both speed and accuracy.- May 06
08:30 AM PDT
-09:30 AM PDT
In Episode 3 of our GMAT Ninja Critical Reasoning series, we tackle Discrepancy, Paradox, and Explain an Oddity questions. You know the feeling: the passage gives you two facts that seem completely contradictory.... - May 08
08:00 AM PDT
-08:30 AM PDT
Join the special YouTube live-stream for selecting the winners of GMAT Club MBA Scholarships sponsored by Juno live. Watch who gets these coveted MBA scholarships offered by GMAT Club and Juno.
19 Sep 2025, 20:25
Kudos
Bookmarks
By the late 1990s, sociologist Fred Block and political economist Peter Evans independently advanced complementary arguments regarding the role of government in fostering technological innovation in the United States. Block contended that significant technological breakthroughs often stemmed from government-led initiatives, with public agencies directing funding and resources toward high-risk, high-reward research that private firms were reluctant to pursue. This perspective challenged the prevailing notion that market forces and competition alone drove technological advancement. Evans expanded this argument, highlighting that public-private partnerships, where governments set initial agendas and incentivized firms to participate, were crucial in sectors like telecommunications, semiconductors, renewable energy, and biotechnology.
Block and Evans’ assertions are difficult to refute. However, the involvement of government agencies did not always yield uniform results across industries, nor did private firms consistently welcome state intervention. In the late 1980s, many semiconductor firms initially resisted the creation of SEMATECH, a public-private consortium designed to revitalize the U.S. semiconductor industry. Despite this resistance, SEMATECH ultimately played a pivotal role in improving production techniques and fostering industry collaboration, setting new standards for cooperative innovation. Similarly, in the aerospace sector, companies varied in their response to NASA’s attempts to involve private firms in developing satellite technology—some firms embraced the opportunity, while others expressed concerns about intellectual property rights, competitive neutrality, and long-term market competition.
According to the passage, scholars whose research on technological innovation preceded that of Block held which of the following views regarding the role of government in fostering innovation?
A. Technological advancements had some influence from government initiatives.
B. The private sector's competitive drive was the primary catalyst for major technological advancements.
C. Public agencies were instrumental in directing resources toward high-risk projects that spurred innovation.
D. Public-private partnerships were essential in driving innovation across sectors like telecommunications and renewable energy.
E. Technological breakthroughs often emerged from public sector industry initiatives.
Block and Evans’ assertions are difficult to refute. However, the involvement of government agencies did not always yield uniform results across industries, nor did private firms consistently welcome state intervention. In the late 1980s, many semiconductor firms initially resisted the creation of SEMATECH, a public-private consortium designed to revitalize the U.S. semiconductor industry. Despite this resistance, SEMATECH ultimately played a pivotal role in improving production techniques and fostering industry collaboration, setting new standards for cooperative innovation. Similarly, in the aerospace sector, companies varied in their response to NASA’s attempts to involve private firms in developing satellite technology—some firms embraced the opportunity, while others expressed concerns about intellectual property rights, competitive neutrality, and long-term market competition.
According to the passage, scholars whose research on technological innovation preceded that of Block held which of the following views regarding the role of government in fostering innovation?
A. Technological advancements had some influence from government initiatives.
B. The private sector's competitive drive was the primary catalyst for major technological advancements.
C. Public agencies were instrumental in directing resources toward high-risk projects that spurred innovation.
D. Public-private partnerships were essential in driving innovation across sectors like telecommunications and renewable energy.
E. Technological breakthroughs often emerged from public sector industry initiatives.
19 Sep 2025, 20:25
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Solution:
By the late 1990s, sociologist Fred Block and political economist Peter Evans independently advanced complementary arguments regarding the role of government in fostering technological innovation in the United States. Block contended that significant technological breakthroughs often stemmed from government-led initiatives, with public agencies directing funding and resources toward high-risk, high-reward research that private firms were reluctant to pursue. This perspective challenged the prevailing notion that market forces and competition alone drove technological advancement. Evans expanded this argument, highlighting that public-private partnerships, where governments set initial agendas and incentivized firms to participate, were crucial in sectors like telecommunications, semiconductors, renewable energy, and biotechnology.
Block and Evans’ assertions are difficult to refute. However, the involvement of government agencies did not always yield uniform results across industries, nor did private firms consistently welcome state intervention. In the late 1980s, many semiconductor firms initially resisted the creation of SEMATECH, a public-private consortium designed to revitalize the U.S. semiconductor industry. Despite this resistance, SEMATECH ultimately played a pivotal role in improving production techniques and fostering industry collaboration, setting new standards for cooperative innovation. Similarly, in the aerospace sector, companies varied in their response to NASA’s attempts to involve private firms in developing satellite technology—some firms embraced the opportunity, while others expressed concerns about intellectual property rights, competitive neutrality, and long-term market competition.
According to the passage, scholars whose research on technological innovation preceded that of Block held which of the following views regarding the role of government in fostering innovation?
A. Technological advancements had some influence from government initiatives.
B. The private sector's competitive drive was the primary catalyst for major technological advancements.
C. Public agencies were instrumental in directing resources toward high-risk projects that spurred innovation.
D. Public-private partnerships were essential in driving innovation across sectors like telecommunications and renewable energy.
E. Technological breakthroughs often emerged from public sector industry initiatives.
A) Incorrect
The passage says Block challenged the dominant market-only view. It does not indicate earlier scholars credited government initiatives.
B) Correct
Block argued against the idea that market forces alone drove technological advance, so earlier scholars are presented as holding that view.
C) Incorrect
Public agencies steering resources to high-risk projects reflects Block’s position, not that of earlier scholars.
D) Incorrect
Public-private partnerships come from Evans’ expansion of Block’s argument, not the prior scholarly consensus.
E) Incorrect
The passage does not suggest earlier scholars credited the public sector with initiating breakthroughs.
Answer: B
By the late 1990s, sociologist Fred Block and political economist Peter Evans independently advanced complementary arguments regarding the role of government in fostering technological innovation in the United States. Block contended that significant technological breakthroughs often stemmed from government-led initiatives, with public agencies directing funding and resources toward high-risk, high-reward research that private firms were reluctant to pursue. This perspective challenged the prevailing notion that market forces and competition alone drove technological advancement. Evans expanded this argument, highlighting that public-private partnerships, where governments set initial agendas and incentivized firms to participate, were crucial in sectors like telecommunications, semiconductors, renewable energy, and biotechnology.
Block and Evans’ assertions are difficult to refute. However, the involvement of government agencies did not always yield uniform results across industries, nor did private firms consistently welcome state intervention. In the late 1980s, many semiconductor firms initially resisted the creation of SEMATECH, a public-private consortium designed to revitalize the U.S. semiconductor industry. Despite this resistance, SEMATECH ultimately played a pivotal role in improving production techniques and fostering industry collaboration, setting new standards for cooperative innovation. Similarly, in the aerospace sector, companies varied in their response to NASA’s attempts to involve private firms in developing satellite technology—some firms embraced the opportunity, while others expressed concerns about intellectual property rights, competitive neutrality, and long-term market competition.
According to the passage, scholars whose research on technological innovation preceded that of Block held which of the following views regarding the role of government in fostering innovation?
A. Technological advancements had some influence from government initiatives.
B. The private sector's competitive drive was the primary catalyst for major technological advancements.
C. Public agencies were instrumental in directing resources toward high-risk projects that spurred innovation.
D. Public-private partnerships were essential in driving innovation across sectors like telecommunications and renewable energy.
E. Technological breakthroughs often emerged from public sector industry initiatives.
A) Incorrect
The passage says Block challenged the dominant market-only view. It does not indicate earlier scholars credited government initiatives.
B) Correct
Block argued against the idea that market forces alone drove technological advance, so earlier scholars are presented as holding that view.
C) Incorrect
Public agencies steering resources to high-risk projects reflects Block’s position, not that of earlier scholars.
D) Incorrect
Public-private partnerships come from Evans’ expansion of Block’s argument, not the prior scholarly consensus.
E) Incorrect
The passage does not suggest earlier scholars credited the public sector with initiating breakthroughs.
Answer: B
